From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit.recursion per task.
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:18:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240612131829.2e33ca71@rorschach.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240612170303.3896084-9-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:44:34 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> Softirq is preemptible on PREEMPT_RT. Without a per-CPU lock in
> local_bh_disable() there is no guarantee that only one device is
> transmitting at a time.
> With preemption and multiple senders it is possible that the per-CPU
> recursion counter gets incremented by different threads and exceeds
> XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT leading to a false positive recursion alert.
>
> Instead of adding a lock to protect the per-CPU variable it is simpler
> to make the counter per-task. Sending and receiving skbs happens always
> in thread context anyway.
>
> Having a lock to protected the per-CPU counter would block/ serialize two
> sending threads needlessly. It would also require a recursive lock to
> ensure that the owner can increment the counter further.
>
> Make the recursion counter a task_struct member on PREEMPT_RT.
I'm curious to what would be the harm to using a per_task counter
instead of per_cpu outside of PREEMPT_RT. That way, we wouldn't have to
have the #ifdef.
-- Steve
>
> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 11 +++++++++++
> include/linux/sched.h | 4 +++-
> net/core/dev.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index d20c6c99eb887..b5ec072ec2430 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -3223,7 +3223,9 @@ struct softnet_data {
> #endif
> /* written and read only by owning cpu: */
> struct {
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> u16 recursion;
> +#endif
> u8 more;
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_EGRESS
> u8 skip_txqueue;
> @@ -3256,10 +3258,19 @@ struct softnet_data {
>
> DECLARE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct softnet_data, softnet_data);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> +static inline int dev_recursion_level(void)
> +{
> + return current->net_xmit_recursion;
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
> static inline int dev_recursion_level(void)
> {
> return this_cpu_read(softnet_data.xmit.recursion);
> }
> +#endif
>
> void __netif_schedule(struct Qdisc *q);
> void netif_schedule_queue(struct netdev_queue *txq);
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 61591ac6eab6d..a9b0ca72db55f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -975,7 +975,9 @@ struct task_struct {
> /* delay due to memory thrashing */
> unsigned in_thrashing:1;
> #endif
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> + u8 net_xmit_recursion;
> +#endif
> unsigned long atomic_flags; /* Flags requiring atomic access. */
>
> struct restart_block restart_block;
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.h b/net/core/dev.h
> index b7b518bc2be55..2f96d63053ad0 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.h
> +++ b/net/core/dev.h
> @@ -150,6 +150,25 @@ struct napi_struct *napi_by_id(unsigned int napi_id);
> void kick_defer_list_purge(struct softnet_data *sd, unsigned int cpu);
>
> #define XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT 8
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> +static inline bool dev_xmit_recursion(void)
> +{
> + return unlikely(current->net_xmit_recursion > XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void dev_xmit_recursion_inc(void)
> +{
> + current->net_xmit_recursion++;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void dev_xmit_recursion_dec(void)
> +{
> + current->net_xmit_recursion--;
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
> static inline bool dev_xmit_recursion(void)
> {
> return unlikely(__this_cpu_read(softnet_data.xmit.recursion) >
> @@ -165,5 +184,6 @@ static inline void dev_xmit_recursion_dec(void)
> {
> __this_cpu_dec(softnet_data.xmit.recursion);
> }
> +#endif
>
> #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-12 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-12 16:44 [PATCH v6 net-next 00/15] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 01/15] locking/local_lock: Introduce guard definition for local_lock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 02/15] locking/local_lock: Add local nested BH locking infrastructure Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 03/15] net: Use __napi_alloc_frag_align() instead of open coding it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 04/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for napi_alloc_cache Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 05/15] net/tcp_sigpool: Use nested-BH locking for sigpool_scratch Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 06/15] net/ipv4: Use nested-BH locking for ipv4_tcp_sk Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 07/15] netfilter: br_netfilter: Use nested-BH locking for brnf_frag_data_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit.recursion per task Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 17:18 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2024-06-14 8:27 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 8:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-14 9:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 14:08 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-06-14 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-14 16:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 16:01 ` [PATCH v6.5 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 09/15] dev: Remove PREEMPT_RT ifdefs from backlog_lock.*() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 10/15] dev: Use nested-BH locking for softnet_data.process_queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 11/15] lwt: Don't disable migration prio invoking BPF Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 12/15] seg6: Use nested-BH locking for seg6_bpf_srh_states Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 13/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for bpf_scratchpad Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-13 9:32 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 15/15] net: Move per-CPU flush-lists to bpf_net_context " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-13 9:33 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240612131829.2e33ca71@rorschach.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox