From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 net-next 05/15] net/tcp_sigpool: Use nested-BH locking for sigpool_scratch.
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:44:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240612170303.3896084-6-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240612170303.3896084-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
sigpool_scratch is a per-CPU variable and relies on disabled BH for its
locking. Without per-CPU locking in local_bh_disable() on PREEMPT_RT
this data structure requires explicit locking.
Make a struct with a pad member (original sigpool_scratch) and a
local_lock_t and use local_lock_nested_bh() for locking. This change
adds only lockdep coverage and does not alter the functional behaviour
for !PREEMPT_RT.
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_sigpool.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_sigpool.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_sigpool.c
index 8512cb09ebc09..d8a4f192873a2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_sigpool.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_sigpool.c
@@ -10,7 +10,14 @@
#include <net/tcp.h>
static size_t __scratch_size;
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void __rcu *, sigpool_scratch);
+struct sigpool_scratch {
+ local_lock_t bh_lock;
+ void __rcu *pad;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sigpool_scratch, sigpool_scratch) = {
+ .bh_lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(bh_lock),
+};
struct sigpool_entry {
struct crypto_ahash *hash;
@@ -72,7 +79,7 @@ static int sigpool_reserve_scratch(size_t size)
break;
}
- old_scratch = rcu_replace_pointer(per_cpu(sigpool_scratch, cpu),
+ old_scratch = rcu_replace_pointer(per_cpu(sigpool_scratch.pad, cpu),
scratch, lockdep_is_held(&cpool_mutex));
if (!cpu_online(cpu) || !old_scratch) {
kfree(old_scratch);
@@ -93,7 +100,7 @@ static void sigpool_scratch_free(void)
int cpu;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
- kfree(rcu_replace_pointer(per_cpu(sigpool_scratch, cpu),
+ kfree(rcu_replace_pointer(per_cpu(sigpool_scratch.pad, cpu),
NULL, lockdep_is_held(&cpool_mutex)));
__scratch_size = 0;
}
@@ -277,7 +284,8 @@ int tcp_sigpool_start(unsigned int id, struct tcp_sigpool *c) __cond_acquires(RC
/* Pairs with tcp_sigpool_reserve_scratch(), scratch area is
* valid (allocated) until tcp_sigpool_end().
*/
- c->scratch = rcu_dereference_bh(*this_cpu_ptr(&sigpool_scratch));
+ local_lock_nested_bh(&sigpool_scratch.bh_lock);
+ c->scratch = rcu_dereference_bh(*this_cpu_ptr(&sigpool_scratch.pad));
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_sigpool_start);
@@ -286,6 +294,7 @@ void tcp_sigpool_end(struct tcp_sigpool *c) __releases(RCU_BH)
{
struct crypto_ahash *hash = crypto_ahash_reqtfm(c->req);
+ local_unlock_nested_bh(&sigpool_scratch.bh_lock);
rcu_read_unlock_bh();
ahash_request_free(c->req);
crypto_free_ahash(hash);
--
2.45.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-12 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-12 16:44 [PATCH v6 net-next 00/15] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 01/15] locking/local_lock: Introduce guard definition for local_lock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 02/15] locking/local_lock: Add local nested BH locking infrastructure Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 03/15] net: Use __napi_alloc_frag_align() instead of open coding it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 04/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for napi_alloc_cache Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 06/15] net/ipv4: Use nested-BH locking for ipv4_tcp_sk Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 07/15] netfilter: br_netfilter: Use nested-BH locking for brnf_frag_data_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit.recursion per task Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 17:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-14 8:27 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 8:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-14 9:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 14:08 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-06-14 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-14 16:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 16:01 ` [PATCH v6.5 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 09/15] dev: Remove PREEMPT_RT ifdefs from backlog_lock.*() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 10/15] dev: Use nested-BH locking for softnet_data.process_queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 11/15] lwt: Don't disable migration prio invoking BPF Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 12/15] seg6: Use nested-BH locking for seg6_bpf_srh_states Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 13/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for bpf_scratchpad Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-13 9:32 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 15/15] net: Move per-CPU flush-lists to bpf_net_context " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-13 9:33 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240612170303.3896084-6-bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox