From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Arseniy Krasnov" <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>,
"Bobby Eshleman" <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
"Arseniy Krasnov" <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vsock/virtio: fix potential unbounded skb queue
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 05:58:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508055343-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af2sXvVCBT05XF0D@sgarzare-redhat>
On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 11:41:21AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 06:48:47PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 02:59:13PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 07:45:10AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 11:09:47AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > > For now, we're already doing something:
> > > > > merging the skuffs if they don't have EOM set.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Right that's good. You could go further and merge with EOM too
> > > > if you stick the info about message boundaries somewhere else.
> > >
> > > This adds a lot of complexity IMO, but we can try.
> > >
> > > Do you have something in mind?
> >
> > BER is clearly overkill but here's a POC that claude made for me,
> > just to give u an idea. It's clearly has a ton of issues,
> > for example I dislike how GFP_ATOMIC is handled.
>
> Okay, I somewhat understand, but clearly this isn't net material
I doubt we have many other options given reverting the regression was
ruled out.
> so for now
> I think the best thing to do is to merge the fixup I sent (or something
> similar):
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260508092330.69690-1-sgarzare@redhat.com/
I reviewed that one, problem is it's a spec violation/change that we'll
have to support forever.
> This is a major change that should be merged with more caution.
> Could this have too much of an impact on performance?
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
It's really a POC, real patch is left as an excersise for the reader :).
The correct approach IMHO is to only start using this
when we wasted a lot of memory on small packets.
For example, if sum(truesize) >= buf size.
then we'll not see a perf impact unless it's already pathological.
> > Yet it seems to work fine in light testing.
> >
> > -->
> >
> >
> > vsock/virtio: use DWARF ULEB128 to record EOM boundaries, enable cross-EOM skb coalescing
> >
> > virtio_transport_recv_enqueue() currently refuses to coalesce an
> > incoming skb with the previous one when the previous skb carries
> > VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM. This forces one skb per seqpacket message.
> > For workloads with many small or zero-byte messages the per-skb
> > overhead (~960 bytes) dominates, causing unbounded memory growth.
> >
> > Decouple message boundary tracking from the skb structure: store
> > boundary offsets in a compact side buffer using DWARF ULEB128
> > encoding with the EOR flag folded into the low bit, then allow
> > the data of multiple complete messages to be coalesced into a single
> > skb.
> >
> > Cross-EOM coalescing fires only when:
> > - both the tail skb and the incoming packet carry EOM (complete msgs)
> > - the incoming packet fits in the tail skb's tailroom
> > - no BPF psock is attached (read_skb expects one msg per skb)
> >
> > On allocation failure the code falls back to separate skbs (existing
> > behaviour). Credit accounting is unchanged; the boundary buffer is
> > capped at PAGE_SIZE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > index f91704731057..e36b9ab28372 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > struct virtio_vsock_skb_cb {
> > bool reply;
> > bool tap_delivered;
> > + bool has_boundary_entries;
> > u32 offset;
> > };
> >
> > @@ -167,6 +168,12 @@ struct virtio_vsock_sock {
> > u32 buf_used;
> > struct sk_buff_head rx_queue;
> > u32 msg_count;
> > +
> > + /* ULEB128-encoded seqpacket message boundary buffer */
> > + u8 *boundary_buf;
> > + u32 boundary_len;
> > + u32 boundary_alloc;
> > + u32 boundary_off;
> > };
> >
> > struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info {
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > index 416d533f493d..81654f70f72c 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> > #include <linux/ctype.h>
> > #include <linux/list.h>
> > +#include <linux/skmsg.h>
> > #include <linux/virtio_vsock.h>
> > #include <uapi/linux/vsockmon.h>
> >
> > @@ -26,6 +27,91 @@
> > /* Threshold for detecting small packets to copy */
> > #define GOOD_COPY_LEN 128
> >
> > +#define VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_INIT 64
> > +#define VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_MAX PAGE_SIZE
> > +
> > +/* ULEB128 boundary encoding: value = (msg_len << 1) | eor.
> > + * Each byte carries 7 data bits; bit 7 is set on all but the last byte.
> > + * Max 5 bytes for a u32 msg_len (33 bits with eor shift).
> > + */
> > +static int vsock_uleb_encode_boundary(u8 *buf, u32 msg_len, bool eor)
> > +{
> > + u64 val = ((u64)msg_len << 1) | eor;
> > + int n = 0;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + buf[n] = val & 0x7f;
> > + val >>= 7;
> > + if (val)
> > + buf[n] |= 0x80;
> > + n++;
> > + } while (val);
> > +
> > + return n;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vsock_uleb_decode_boundary(const u8 *buf, u32 avail,
> > + u32 *msg_len, bool *eor)
> > +{
> > + u64 val = 0;
> > + int shift = 0;
> > + int n = 0;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + if (n >= avail || shift >= 35)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + val |= (u64)(buf[n] & 0x7f) << shift;
> > + shift += 7;
> > + } while (buf[n++] & 0x80);
> > +
> > + *eor = val & 1;
> > + *msg_len = val >> 1;
> > + return n;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vsock_boundary_buf_compact(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs)
> > +{
> > + if (vvs->boundary_off == 0)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + vvs->boundary_len -= vvs->boundary_off;
> > + memmove(vvs->boundary_buf, vvs->boundary_buf + vvs->boundary_off,
> > + vvs->boundary_len);
> > + vvs->boundary_off = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vsock_boundary_buf_ensure(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, u32 needed)
> > +{
> > + u32 new_alloc;
> > + u8 *new_buf;
> > +
> > + if (vvs->boundary_alloc >= needed)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* Reclaim consumed space before growing */
> > + if (vvs->boundary_off) {
> > + needed -= vvs->boundary_off;
> > + vsock_boundary_buf_compact(vvs);
> > + if (vvs->boundary_alloc >= needed)
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + new_alloc = max(needed, vvs->boundary_alloc ? vvs->boundary_alloc * 2
> > + : VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_INIT);
> > + if (new_alloc > VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_MAX)
> > + new_alloc = VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_MAX;
> > + if (new_alloc < needed)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + new_buf = krealloc(vvs->boundary_buf, new_alloc, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + if (!new_buf)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + vvs->boundary_buf = new_buf;
> > + vvs->boundary_alloc = new_alloc;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void virtio_transport_cancel_close_work(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > bool cancel_timeout);
> > static s64 virtio_transport_has_space(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs);
> > @@ -682,41 +768,74 @@ virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_peek(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > total = 0;
> > len = msg_data_left(msg);
> >
> > - skb_queue_walk(&vvs->rx_queue, skb) {
> > - struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
> > + skb = skb_peek(&vvs->rx_queue);
> > + if (skb && VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->has_boundary_entries) {
> > + u32 msg_len, offset;
> > + size_t bytes;
> > + bool eor;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > - if (total < len) {
> > - size_t bytes;
> > + ret = vsock_uleb_decode_boundary(
> > + vvs->boundary_buf + vvs->boundary_off,
> > + vvs->boundary_len - vvs->boundary_off,
> > + &msg_len, &eor);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto unlock;
> > +
> > + offset = VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset;
> > + bytes = min(len, (size_t)msg_len);
> > +
> > + if (bytes) {
> > int err;
> >
> > - bytes = len - total;
> > - if (bytes > skb->len)
> > - bytes = skb->len;
> > -
> > spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > -
> > - /* sk_lock is held by caller so no one else can dequeue.
> > - * Unlock rx_lock since skb_copy_datagram_iter() may sleep.
> > - */
> > - err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset,
> > + err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, offset,
> > &msg->msg_iter, bytes);
> > if (err)
> > return err;
> > -
> > spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > }
> >
> > - total += skb->len;
> > - hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> > + total = msg_len;
> > + if (eor)
> > + msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
> > + } else {
> > + skb_queue_walk(&vvs->rx_queue, skb) {
> > + struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
> >
> > - if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
> > - if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
> > - msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
> > + if (total < len) {
> > + size_t bytes;
> > + int err;
> >
> > - break;
> > + bytes = len - total;
> > + if (bytes > skb->len)
> > + bytes = skb->len;
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > +
> > + err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(
> > + skb,
> > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset,
> > + &msg->msg_iter, bytes);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > + }
> > +
> > + total += skb->len;
> > + hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> > +
> > + if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
> > + if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) &
> > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
> > + msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +unlock:
> > spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> >
> > return total;
> > @@ -740,57 +859,105 @@ static int virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > }
> >
> > while (!msg_ready) {
> > - struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
> > - size_t pkt_len;
> > -
> > - skb = __skb_dequeue(&vvs->rx_queue);
> > + skb = skb_peek(&vvs->rx_queue);
> > if (!skb)
> > break;
> > - hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> > - pkt_len = (size_t)le32_to_cpu(hdr->len);
> >
> > - if (dequeued_len >= 0) {
> > + if (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->has_boundary_entries) {
> > size_t bytes_to_copy;
> > + u32 msg_len, offset;
> > + bool eor;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > - bytes_to_copy = min(user_buf_len, pkt_len);
> > + ret = vsock_uleb_decode_boundary(
> > + vvs->boundary_buf + vvs->boundary_off,
> > + vvs->boundary_len - vvs->boundary_off,
> > + &msg_len, &eor);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + break;
> > + vvs->boundary_off += ret;
> >
> > - if (bytes_to_copy) {
> > + offset = VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset;
> > + bytes_to_copy = min(user_buf_len, (size_t)msg_len);
> > +
> > + if (bytes_to_copy && dequeued_len >= 0) {
> > int err;
> >
> > - /* sk_lock is held by caller so no one else can dequeue.
> > - * Unlock rx_lock since skb_copy_datagram_iter() may sleep.
> > - */
> > spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > -
> > - err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, 0,
> > + err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, offset,
> > &msg->msg_iter,
> > bytes_to_copy);
> > - if (err) {
> > - /* Copy of message failed. Rest of
> > - * fragments will be freed without copy.
> > - */
> > - dequeued_len = err;
> > - } else {
> > - user_buf_len -= bytes_to_copy;
> > - }
> > -
> > spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > + if (err)
> > + dequeued_len = err;
> > + else
> > + user_buf_len -= bytes_to_copy;
> > }
> >
> > if (dequeued_len >= 0)
> > - dequeued_len += pkt_len;
> > - }
> > + dequeued_len += msg_len;
> >
> > - if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
> > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset += msg_len;
> > msg_ready = true;
> > vvs->msg_count--;
> >
> > - if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
> > + if (eor)
> > msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
> > - }
> >
> > - virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt_len, pkt_len);
> > - kfree_skb(skb);
> > + virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, msg_len, msg_len);
> > +
> > + if (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset >= skb->len) {
> > + __skb_unlink(skb, &vvs->rx_queue);
> > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (vvs->boundary_off >= vvs->boundary_len / 2)
> > + vsock_boundary_buf_compact(vvs);
> > + } else {
> > + struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
> > + size_t pkt_len;
> > +
> > + skb = __skb_dequeue(&vvs->rx_queue);
> > + if (!skb)
> > + break;
> > + hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> > + pkt_len = (size_t)le32_to_cpu(hdr->len);
> > +
> > + if (dequeued_len >= 0) {
> > + size_t bytes_to_copy;
> > +
> > + bytes_to_copy = min(user_buf_len, pkt_len);
> > +
> > + if (bytes_to_copy) {
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > + err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(
> > + skb, 0, &msg->msg_iter,
> > + bytes_to_copy);
> > + if (err)
> > + dequeued_len = err;
> > + else
> > + user_buf_len -= bytes_to_copy;
> > + spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (dequeued_len >= 0)
> > + dequeued_len += pkt_len;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
> > + msg_ready = true;
> > + vvs->msg_count--;
> > +
> > + if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) &
> > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
> > + msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
> > + }
> > +
> > + virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt_len, pkt_len);
> > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > @@ -1132,6 +1299,7 @@ void virtio_transport_destruct(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> >
> > virtio_transport_cancel_close_work(vsk, true);
> >
> > + kfree(vvs->boundary_buf);
> > kfree(vvs);
> > vsk->trans = NULL;
> > }
> > @@ -1224,6 +1392,11 @@ static void virtio_transport_remove_sock(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> > * removing it.
> > */
> > __skb_queue_purge(&vvs->rx_queue);
> > + kfree(vvs->boundary_buf);
> > + vvs->boundary_buf = NULL;
> > + vvs->boundary_len = 0;
> > + vvs->boundary_alloc = 0;
> > + vvs->boundary_off = 0;
> > vsock_remove_sock(vsk);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1395,23 +1568,62 @@ virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > !skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
> > struct virtio_vsock_hdr *last_hdr;
> > struct sk_buff *last_skb;
> > + bool last_has_eom;
> > + bool has_eom;
> >
> > last_skb = skb_peek_tail(&vvs->rx_queue);
> > last_hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(last_skb);
> > + last_has_eom = le32_to_cpu(last_hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM;
> > + has_eom = le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM;
> >
> > - /* If there is space in the last packet queued, we copy the
> > - * new packet in its buffer. We avoid this if the last packet
> > - * queued has VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM set, because this is
> > - * delimiter of SEQPACKET message, so 'pkt' is the first packet
> > - * of a new message.
> > - */
> > - if (skb->len < skb_tailroom(last_skb) &&
> > - !(le32_to_cpu(last_hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM)) {
> > - memcpy(skb_put(last_skb, skb->len), skb->data, skb->len);
> > - free_pkt = true;
> > - last_hdr->flags |= hdr->flags;
> > - le32_add_cpu(&last_hdr->len, len);
> > - goto out;
> > + if (skb->len < skb_tailroom(last_skb)) {
> > + if (!last_has_eom) {
> > + /* Same-message coalescing (existing path) */
> > + memcpy(skb_put(last_skb, skb->len),
> > + skb->data, skb->len);
> > + free_pkt = true;
> > + last_hdr->flags |= hdr->flags;
> > + le32_add_cpu(&last_hdr->len, len);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Cross-EOM: coalesce complete messages into one skb,
> > + * recording message boundaries in a compact BER buffer.
> > + * Only when incoming packet also has EOM (complete msg).
> > + */
> > + if (has_eom && !sk_psock(sk_vsock(vsk))) {
> > + bool prev_eor, cur_eor;
> > + u8 tmp[12];
> > + int n = 0;
> > +
> > + cur_eor = le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) &
> > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR;
> > +
> > + if (!VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(last_skb)->has_boundary_entries) {
> > + u32 prev_len = le32_to_cpu(last_hdr->len);
> > +
> > + prev_eor = le32_to_cpu(last_hdr->flags) &
> > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR;
> > + n += vsock_uleb_encode_boundary(
> > + tmp + n, prev_len, prev_eor);
> > + }
> > + n += vsock_uleb_encode_boundary(
> > + tmp + n, len, cur_eor);
> > +
> > + if (!vsock_boundary_buf_ensure(
> > + vvs, vvs->boundary_len + n)) {
> > + memcpy(vvs->boundary_buf +
> > + vvs->boundary_len, tmp, n);
> > + vvs->boundary_len += n;
> > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(last_skb)->has_boundary_entries = true;
> > + memcpy(skb_put(last_skb, skb->len),
> > + skb->data, skb->len);
> > + free_pkt = true;
> > + last_hdr->flags |= hdr->flags;
> > + le32_add_cpu(&last_hdr->len, len);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 12:26 [PATCH net] vsock/virtio: fix potential unbounded skb queue Eric Dumazet
2026-05-05 2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-05-05 13:51 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-05 14:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-05-05 16:11 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-05 16:37 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-05-06 9:50 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2026-05-06 14:00 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-06 15:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-07 9:09 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-07 11:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-07 12:59 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-07 14:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-07 16:05 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-07 16:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-05-07 17:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-08 9:26 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-07 14:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-07 22:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-08 9:41 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-08 9:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-08 9:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-05-08 10:11 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-06 15:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-06 15:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-05-06 15:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260508055343-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=avkrasnov@salutedevices.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox