Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Arseniy Krasnov" <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>,
	"Bobby Eshleman" <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	"Arseniy Krasnov" <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vsock/virtio: fix potential unbounded skb queue
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 11:41:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <af2sXvVCBT05XF0D@sgarzare-redhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260507163710-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 06:48:47PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 02:59:13PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 07:45:10AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 11:09:47AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:

[...]

>> > > For now, we're already doing something:
>> > > merging the skuffs if they don't have EOM set.
>> >
>> >
>> > Right that's good. You could go further and merge with EOM too
>> > if you stick the info about message boundaries somewhere else.
>>
>> This adds a lot of complexity IMO, but we can try.
>>
>> Do you have something in mind?
>
>BER is clearly overkill but here's a POC that claude made for me,
>just to give u an idea. It's clearly has a ton of issues,
>for example I dislike how GFP_ATOMIC is handled.

Okay, I somewhat understand, but clearly this isn't net material, so for 
now I think the best thing to do is to merge the fixup I sent (or 
something similar): 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260508092330.69690-1-sgarzare@redhat.com/

This is a major change that should be merged with more caution.
Could this have too much of an impact on performance?

Thanks,
Stefano

>Yet it seems to work fine in light testing.
>
>-->
>
>
>vsock/virtio: use DWARF ULEB128 to record EOM boundaries, enable cross-EOM skb coalescing
>
>virtio_transport_recv_enqueue() currently refuses to coalesce an
>incoming skb with the previous one when the previous skb carries
>VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM.  This forces one skb per seqpacket message.
>For workloads with many small or zero-byte messages the per-skb
>overhead (~960 bytes) dominates, causing unbounded memory growth.
>
>Decouple message boundary tracking from the skb structure: store
>boundary offsets in a compact side buffer using DWARF ULEB128
>encoding with the EOR flag folded into the low bit, then allow
>the data of multiple complete messages to be coalesced into a single
>skb.
>
>Cross-EOM coalescing fires only when:
>- both the tail skb and the incoming packet carry EOM (complete msgs)
>- the incoming packet fits in the tail skb's tailroom
>- no BPF psock is attached (read_skb expects one msg per skb)
>
>On allocation failure the code falls back to separate skbs (existing
>behaviour).  Credit accounting is unchanged; the boundary buffer is
>capped at PAGE_SIZE.
>
>Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>index f91704731057..e36b9ab28372 100644
>--- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>+++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> struct virtio_vsock_skb_cb {
> 	bool reply;
> 	bool tap_delivered;
>+	bool has_boundary_entries;
> 	u32 offset;
> };
>
>@@ -167,6 +168,12 @@ struct virtio_vsock_sock {
> 	u32 buf_used;
> 	struct sk_buff_head rx_queue;
> 	u32 msg_count;
>+
>+	/* ULEB128-encoded seqpacket message boundary buffer */
>+	u8 *boundary_buf;
>+	u32 boundary_len;
>+	u32 boundary_alloc;
>+	u32 boundary_off;
> };
>
> struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info {
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index 416d533f493d..81654f70f72c 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> #include <linux/ctype.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
>+#include <linux/skmsg.h>
> #include <linux/virtio_vsock.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/vsockmon.h>
>
>@@ -26,6 +27,91 @@
> /* Threshold for detecting small packets to copy */
> #define GOOD_COPY_LEN  128
>
>+#define VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_INIT	64
>+#define VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_MAX	PAGE_SIZE
>+
>+/* ULEB128 boundary encoding: value = (msg_len << 1) | eor.
>+ * Each byte carries 7 data bits; bit 7 is set on all but the last byte.
>+ * Max 5 bytes for a u32 msg_len (33 bits with eor shift).
>+ */
>+static int vsock_uleb_encode_boundary(u8 *buf, u32 msg_len, bool eor)
>+{
>+	u64 val = ((u64)msg_len << 1) | eor;
>+	int n = 0;
>+
>+	do {
>+		buf[n] = val & 0x7f;
>+		val >>= 7;
>+		if (val)
>+			buf[n] |= 0x80;
>+		n++;
>+	} while (val);
>+
>+	return n;
>+}
>+
>+static int vsock_uleb_decode_boundary(const u8 *buf, u32 avail,
>+				      u32 *msg_len, bool *eor)
>+{
>+	u64 val = 0;
>+	int shift = 0;
>+	int n = 0;
>+
>+	do {
>+		if (n >= avail || shift >= 35)
>+			return -EINVAL;
>+		val |= (u64)(buf[n] & 0x7f) << shift;
>+		shift += 7;
>+	} while (buf[n++] & 0x80);
>+
>+	*eor = val & 1;
>+	*msg_len = val >> 1;
>+	return n;
>+}
>+
>+static void vsock_boundary_buf_compact(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs)
>+{
>+	if (vvs->boundary_off == 0)
>+		return;
>+
>+	vvs->boundary_len -= vvs->boundary_off;
>+	memmove(vvs->boundary_buf, vvs->boundary_buf + vvs->boundary_off,
>+		vvs->boundary_len);
>+	vvs->boundary_off = 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int vsock_boundary_buf_ensure(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, u32 needed)
>+{
>+	u32 new_alloc;
>+	u8 *new_buf;
>+
>+	if (vvs->boundary_alloc >= needed)
>+		return 0;
>+
>+	/* Reclaim consumed space before growing */
>+	if (vvs->boundary_off) {
>+		needed -= vvs->boundary_off;
>+		vsock_boundary_buf_compact(vvs);
>+		if (vvs->boundary_alloc >= needed)
>+			return 0;
>+	}
>+
>+	new_alloc = max(needed, vvs->boundary_alloc ? vvs->boundary_alloc * 2
>+						    : VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_INIT);
>+	if (new_alloc > VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_MAX)
>+		new_alloc = VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_MAX;
>+	if (new_alloc < needed)
>+		return -ENOMEM;
>+
>+	new_buf = krealloc(vvs->boundary_buf, new_alloc, GFP_ATOMIC);
>+	if (!new_buf)
>+		return -ENOMEM;
>+
>+	vvs->boundary_buf = new_buf;
>+	vvs->boundary_alloc = new_alloc;
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
> static void virtio_transport_cancel_close_work(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 					       bool cancel_timeout);
> static s64 virtio_transport_has_space(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs);
>@@ -682,41 +768,74 @@ virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_peek(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 	total = 0;
> 	len = msg_data_left(msg);
>
>-	skb_queue_walk(&vvs->rx_queue, skb) {
>-		struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
>+	skb = skb_peek(&vvs->rx_queue);
>+	if (skb && VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->has_boundary_entries) {
>+		u32 msg_len, offset;
>+		size_t bytes;
>+		bool eor;
>+		int ret;
>
>-		if (total < len) {
>-			size_t bytes;
>+		ret = vsock_uleb_decode_boundary(
>+			vvs->boundary_buf + vvs->boundary_off,
>+			vvs->boundary_len - vvs->boundary_off,
>+			&msg_len, &eor);
>+		if (ret < 0)
>+			goto unlock;
>+
>+		offset = VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset;
>+		bytes = min(len, (size_t)msg_len);
>+
>+		if (bytes) {
> 			int err;
>
>-			bytes = len - total;
>-			if (bytes > skb->len)
>-				bytes = skb->len;
>-
> 			spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>-
>-			/* sk_lock is held by caller so no one else can dequeue.
>-			 * Unlock rx_lock since skb_copy_datagram_iter() may sleep.
>-			 */
>-			err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset,
>+			err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, offset,
> 						     &msg->msg_iter, bytes);
> 			if (err)
> 				return err;
>-
> 			spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> 		}
>
>-		total += skb->len;
>-		hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
>+		total = msg_len;
>+		if (eor)
>+			msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
>+	} else {
>+		skb_queue_walk(&vvs->rx_queue, skb) {
>+			struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
>
>-		if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
>-			if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
>-				msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
>+			if (total < len) {
>+				size_t bytes;
>+				int err;
>
>-			break;
>+				bytes = len - total;
>+				if (bytes > skb->len)
>+					bytes = skb->len;
>+
>+				spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>+
>+				err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(
>+					skb,
>+					VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset,
>+					&msg->msg_iter, bytes);
>+				if (err)
>+					return err;
>+
>+				spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>+			}
>+
>+			total += skb->len;
>+			hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
>+
>+			if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
>+				if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) &
>+				    VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
>+					msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
>+				break;
>+			}
> 		}
> 	}
>
>+unlock:
> 	spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>
> 	return total;
>@@ -740,57 +859,105 @@ static int virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 	}
>
> 	while (!msg_ready) {
>-		struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
>-		size_t pkt_len;
>-
>-		skb = __skb_dequeue(&vvs->rx_queue);
>+		skb = skb_peek(&vvs->rx_queue);
> 		if (!skb)
> 			break;
>-		hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
>-		pkt_len = (size_t)le32_to_cpu(hdr->len);
>
>-		if (dequeued_len >= 0) {
>+		if (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->has_boundary_entries) {
> 			size_t bytes_to_copy;
>+			u32 msg_len, offset;
>+			bool eor;
>+			int ret;
>
>-			bytes_to_copy = min(user_buf_len, pkt_len);
>+			ret = vsock_uleb_decode_boundary(
>+				vvs->boundary_buf + vvs->boundary_off,
>+				vvs->boundary_len - vvs->boundary_off,
>+				&msg_len, &eor);
>+			if (ret < 0)
>+				break;
>+			vvs->boundary_off += ret;
>
>-			if (bytes_to_copy) {
>+			offset = VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset;
>+			bytes_to_copy = min(user_buf_len, (size_t)msg_len);
>+
>+			if (bytes_to_copy && dequeued_len >= 0) {
> 				int err;
>
>-				/* sk_lock is held by caller so no one else can dequeue.
>-				 * Unlock rx_lock since skb_copy_datagram_iter() may sleep.
>-				 */
> 				spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>-
>-				err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, 0,
>+				err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, offset,
> 							     &msg->msg_iter,
> 							     bytes_to_copy);
>-				if (err) {
>-					/* Copy of message failed. Rest of
>-					 * fragments will be freed without copy.
>-					 */
>-					dequeued_len = err;
>-				} else {
>-					user_buf_len -= bytes_to_copy;
>-				}
>-
> 				spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>+				if (err)
>+					dequeued_len = err;
>+				else
>+					user_buf_len -= bytes_to_copy;
> 			}
>
> 			if (dequeued_len >= 0)
>-				dequeued_len += pkt_len;
>-		}
>+				dequeued_len += msg_len;
>
>-		if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
>+			VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset += msg_len;
> 			msg_ready = true;
> 			vvs->msg_count--;
>
>-			if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
>+			if (eor)
> 				msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
>-		}
>
>-		virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt_len, pkt_len);
>-		kfree_skb(skb);
>+			virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, msg_len, msg_len);
>+
>+			if (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset >= skb->len) {
>+				__skb_unlink(skb, &vvs->rx_queue);
>+				kfree_skb(skb);
>+			}
>+
>+			if (vvs->boundary_off >= vvs->boundary_len / 2)
>+				vsock_boundary_buf_compact(vvs);
>+		} else {
>+			struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
>+			size_t pkt_len;
>+
>+			skb = __skb_dequeue(&vvs->rx_queue);
>+			if (!skb)
>+				break;
>+			hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
>+			pkt_len = (size_t)le32_to_cpu(hdr->len);
>+
>+			if (dequeued_len >= 0) {
>+				size_t bytes_to_copy;
>+
>+				bytes_to_copy = min(user_buf_len, pkt_len);
>+
>+				if (bytes_to_copy) {
>+					int err;
>+
>+					spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>+					err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(
>+						skb, 0, &msg->msg_iter,
>+						bytes_to_copy);
>+					if (err)
>+						dequeued_len = err;
>+					else
>+						user_buf_len -= bytes_to_copy;
>+					spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>+				}
>+
>+				if (dequeued_len >= 0)
>+					dequeued_len += pkt_len;
>+			}
>+
>+			if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
>+				msg_ready = true;
>+				vvs->msg_count--;
>+
>+				if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) &
>+				    VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
>+					msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
>+			}
>+
>+			virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt_len, pkt_len);
>+			kfree_skb(skb);
>+		}
> 	}
>
> 	spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>@@ -1132,6 +1299,7 @@ void virtio_transport_destruct(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
>
> 	virtio_transport_cancel_close_work(vsk, true);
>
>+	kfree(vvs->boundary_buf);
> 	kfree(vvs);
> 	vsk->trans = NULL;
> }
>@@ -1224,6 +1392,11 @@ static void virtio_transport_remove_sock(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> 	 * removing it.
> 	 */
> 	__skb_queue_purge(&vvs->rx_queue);
>+	kfree(vvs->boundary_buf);
>+	vvs->boundary_buf = NULL;
>+	vvs->boundary_len = 0;
>+	vvs->boundary_alloc = 0;
>+	vvs->boundary_off = 0;
> 	vsock_remove_sock(vsk);
> }
>
>@@ -1395,23 +1568,62 @@ virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 	    !skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
> 		struct virtio_vsock_hdr *last_hdr;
> 		struct sk_buff *last_skb;
>+		bool last_has_eom;
>+		bool has_eom;
>
> 		last_skb = skb_peek_tail(&vvs->rx_queue);
> 		last_hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(last_skb);
>+		last_has_eom = le32_to_cpu(last_hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM;
>+		has_eom = le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM;
>
>-		/* If there is space in the last packet queued, we copy the
>-		 * new packet in its buffer. We avoid this if the last packet
>-		 * queued has VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM set, because this is
>-		 * delimiter of SEQPACKET message, so 'pkt' is the first packet
>-		 * of a new message.
>-		 */
>-		if (skb->len < skb_tailroom(last_skb) &&
>-		    !(le32_to_cpu(last_hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM)) {
>-			memcpy(skb_put(last_skb, skb->len), skb->data, skb->len);
>-			free_pkt = true;
>-			last_hdr->flags |= hdr->flags;
>-			le32_add_cpu(&last_hdr->len, len);
>-			goto out;
>+		if (skb->len < skb_tailroom(last_skb)) {
>+			if (!last_has_eom) {
>+				/* Same-message coalescing (existing path) */
>+				memcpy(skb_put(last_skb, skb->len),
>+				       skb->data, skb->len);
>+				free_pkt = true;
>+				last_hdr->flags |= hdr->flags;
>+				le32_add_cpu(&last_hdr->len, len);
>+				goto out;
>+			}
>+
>+			/* Cross-EOM: coalesce complete messages into one skb,
>+			 * recording message boundaries in a compact BER buffer.
>+			 * Only when incoming packet also has EOM (complete msg).
>+			 */
>+			if (has_eom && !sk_psock(sk_vsock(vsk))) {
>+				bool prev_eor, cur_eor;
>+				u8 tmp[12];
>+				int n = 0;
>+
>+				cur_eor = le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) &
>+					  VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR;
>+
>+				if (!VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(last_skb)->has_boundary_entries) {
>+					u32 prev_len = le32_to_cpu(last_hdr->len);
>+
>+					prev_eor = le32_to_cpu(last_hdr->flags) &
>+						   VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR;
>+					n += vsock_uleb_encode_boundary(
>+						tmp + n, prev_len, prev_eor);
>+				}
>+				n += vsock_uleb_encode_boundary(
>+					tmp + n, len, cur_eor);
>+
>+				if (!vsock_boundary_buf_ensure(
>+					    vvs, vvs->boundary_len + n)) {
>+					memcpy(vvs->boundary_buf +
>+					       vvs->boundary_len, tmp, n);
>+					vvs->boundary_len += n;
>+					VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(last_skb)->has_boundary_entries = true;
>+					memcpy(skb_put(last_skb, skb->len),
>+					       skb->data, skb->len);
>+					free_pkt = true;
>+					last_hdr->flags |= hdr->flags;
>+					le32_add_cpu(&last_hdr->len, len);
>+					goto out;
>+				}
>+			}
> 		}
> 	}
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-08  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-30 12:26 [PATCH net] vsock/virtio: fix potential unbounded skb queue Eric Dumazet
2026-05-05  2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-05-05 13:51 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-05 14:14   ` Eric Dumazet
2026-05-05 16:11     ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-05 16:37       ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-05-06  9:50         ` Arseniy Krasnov
2026-05-06 14:00           ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-06 15:37       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-07  9:09         ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-07 11:45           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-07 12:59             ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-07 14:33               ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-07 16:05                 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-07 16:32                   ` Eric Dumazet
2026-05-07 17:18                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-08  9:26                       ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-07 14:52               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-07 22:48               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-08  9:41                 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2026-05-08  9:43                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-08  9:58                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-08 10:11                     ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-06 15:15     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-06 15:38       ` Eric Dumazet
2026-05-06 15:49         ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=af2sXvVCBT05XF0D@sgarzare-redhat \
    --to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=avkrasnov@salutedevices.com \
    --cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox