From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: michael.dege@renesas.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se, paul@pbarker.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 09/13] net: renesas: rswitch: update port HW init
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 18:35:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513013554.1408426-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511-rswitch_add_vlans-v4-9-a5a225f8faae@renesas.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
net: renesas: rswitch: update port HW init
Certain Ethernet and cpu port settings need to be updated to prepare
for vlan support.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch_main.c
> index 90c44dcfd1691..d00af333fcce5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch_main.c
> @@ -737,8 +737,11 @@ static int rswitch_gwca_hw_init(struct rswitch_private *priv)
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
>
> - iowrite32(GWVCC_VEM_SC_TAG, priv->addr + GWVCC);
> - iowrite32(0, priv->addr + GWTTFC);
> + iowrite32(0, priv->addr + GWIRC);
Is it safe to completely remove the initialization of GWVCC here rather
than explicitly clearing it with iowrite32(0, priv->addr + GWVCC)?
If a bootloader, firmware, or a prior kernel (e.g., across a kexec warm
reboot) previously configured the switch to use Switch Control Tags,
this register might retain a stale VEM_SC_TAG value.
> + iowrite32(FIELD_PREP(DQD, DES_RAM_DP), priv->addr + GWRDQDC0);
> + /* Drop frames with unknown tags */
> + iowrite32(UT, priv->addr + GWTTFC);
> +
> iowrite32(lower_32_bits(priv->gwca.linkfix_table_dma), priv->addr + GWDCBAC1);
[ ... ]
> @@ -1284,7 +1288,12 @@ static int rswitch_etha_hw_init(struct rswitch_etha *etha, const u8 *mac)
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
>
> - iowrite32(EAVCC_VEM_SC_TAG, etha->addr + EAVCC);
> + iowrite32(0, etha->addr + EAIRC);
Similarly, should EAVCC be explicitly cleared to 0 here?
Other registers like EAIRC and GWIRC are being explicitly set to 0
in this patch, which suggests the driver cannot always rely on the hardware
reset state to zero out configurations.
If a stale value is retained in EAVCC, could it cause issues for subsequent
checks that might rely on reading EAVCC to determine if a default VLAN is
already set?
> + iowrite32(FIELD_PREP(DQD, DES_RAM_DP), etha->addr + EATDQDC0);
> +
> + /* Drop frames with unknown tags */
> + iowrite32(UT, etha->addr + EARTFC);
> +
> rswitch_rmac_setting(etha, mac);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 8:52 [net-next PATCH v4 00/13] net: renesas: rswitch: R-Car S4 add VLAN aware switching Michael Dege
2026-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/13] net: renesas: rswitch: improve port change mode functions Michael Dege
2026-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/13] net: renesas: rswitch: use device instead of net_device Michael Dege
2026-05-13 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/13] net: renesas: rswitch: fix FWPC2 register access macros Michael Dege
2026-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/13] net: renesas: rswitch: add register definitions for vlan support Michael Dege
2026-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/13] net: renesas: rswitch: add exception path for packets with unknown dst MAC Michael Dege
2026-05-13 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-13 1:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/13] net: renesas: rswitch: add forwarding rules for gwca Michael Dege
2026-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/13] net: renesas: rswitch: make helper functions available to whole driver Michael Dege
2026-05-13 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/13] net: renesas: rswitch: add basic vlan init to rswitch_fwd_init Michael Dege
2026-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/13] net: renesas: rswitch: update port HW init Michael Dege
2026-05-13 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/13] net: renesas: rswitch: clean up is_rdev rswitch_device checking Michael Dege
2026-05-13 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 11/13] net: renesas: rswitch: add passing of rswitch_private into notifiers Michael Dege
2026-05-13 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 12/13] net: renesas: rswitch: add handler for FDB notification Michael Dege
2026-05-13 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 13/13] net: renesas: rswitch: add vlan aware switching Michael Dege
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260513013554.1408426-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.dege@renesas.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@pbarker.dev \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox