Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
	vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com,
	jiri@resnulli.us, ivecera@redhat.com, donald.hunter@gmail.com,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/3] dpll: do not truncate the requested pin frequency before checking it
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:12:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924231211.568213-2-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924231211.568213-1-kuba@kernel.org>

DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY is a u64 on the wire and dpll_pin_freq_set() keeps it
as one, but dpll_pin_is_freq_supported() takes a u32 while the ranges it
compares against are u64. The supported-frequency check therefore only
looks at the low 32 bits, and the full value is what reaches the driver.

Nothing is hitting this today. Reaching it at all needs a pin-set above
U32_MAX, which no sane caller sends, and the outcome is mild: a pin
advertising 10 kHz accepts 0x1_0000_2710, ice narrows it straight back to
10 kHz in ice_dpll_pin_freq_set(), so the hardware still ends up on an
advertised frequency and only the "frequency is not supported by the
device" rejection goes missing. The other direction - a legitimate request
above U32_MAX wrapping out of the pin's range - needs a driver advertising
such a range, and none does; zl3073x_pin_check_freq() refuses one outright.

So this is types rather than a live bug. Widen the check to match the
attribute, the ranges and the driver callback instead of adding a U32_MAX
rejection, so that the second case stays right if such a driver appears.
dpll_pin_esync_set() already keeps u64 throughout its equivalent loop.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
index fb24fd53f2e1..e5380d95f238 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ dpll_msg_add_pin_ref_sync(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
 	return -EMSGSIZE;
 }
 
-static bool dpll_pin_is_freq_supported(struct dpll_pin *pin, u32 freq)
+static bool dpll_pin_is_freq_supported(struct dpll_pin *pin, u64 freq)
 {
 	int fs;
 
-- 
2.55.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 23:12 [PATCH net-next 0/3] dpll: fix LLM nit picks from the spec scan Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-24 23:12 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-09-25 17:59   ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] dpll: do not truncate the requested pin frequency before checking it Ivan Vecera
2026-09-24 23:12 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] netlink: specs: dpll: declare pad in the nests which carry 64-bit values Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-25 18:00   ` Ivan Vecera
2026-09-24 23:12 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] netlink: specs: dpll: drop the reference to DPLL_MODE_DETACHED Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-25 18:00   ` Ivan Vecera
2026-09-26  1:20 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] dpll: fix LLM nit picks from the spec scan patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260924231211.568213-2-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox