Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: dt-bindings: Introduce the Qualcomm IPQESS Ethernet switch

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 24/10/2023 12:05, Romain Gantois wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
>> On 24/10/2023 11:54, Romain Gantois wrote:
>>> Hello Rob,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2023, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>>> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>>>>
>>>> Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
>>>> that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
>>>> your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Even after upgrading dtschema to 2023.9, installing yamllint 1.32.0 and running 
>>> without DT_SCHEMA_FILES, I can't seem to reproduce this error. I've also tried 
>>> rebasing on v6.5-rc1 which didn't show it either. However, It seems like 
>>
>> v6.5-rc1 is some ancient version, so how can you rebase on top of it?
> I just cherry-picked this patch series on v6.5-rc1. I also tried v6.6-rc1. Since 
> Rob mentionned basing his series on rc1 in his last message, I inferred that he 
> compiled the dtb checks on the last kernel rc1, but maybe I misunderstood what 
> he meant. 
> 
>>
>> Which commit this is based on?
> 
> This patch series was based on:
> 
> 6e7ce2d71bb9 net: lan966x: remove useless code in lan966x_xtr_irq_handler
> 
> which was the latest commit in net-next/main at the time. Essentially, the patch 
> series is meant to be based on net-next.
> 

Ah, ok.

Rob's bot might be using not-yet-released dtschema from main branch,
thus the error. However the error is true: you added a custom field
without type. That's why I asked: where is it defined?

Best regards,
Krzysztof