[PATCH v2] net/sched: fix use-after-free in taprio_dev_notifier

[PATCH v2] net/sched: fix use-after-free in taprio_dev_notifier

[Hyunwoo Kim]

Since taprio’s taprio_dev_notifier() isn’t protected by an
RCU read-side critical section, a race with advance_sched()
can lead to a use-after-free.

Adding rcu_read_lock() inside taprio_dev_notifier() prevents this.

Fixes: fed87cc6718a ("net/sched: taprio: automatically calculate queueMaxSDU based on TC gate durations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Add the appropriate tags.
- v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aElUZyKy7x66X3SD@v4bel-B760M-AORUS-ELITE-AX/
---
 net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
index 14021b812329..bd2b02d1dc63 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
@@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
 	if (event != NETDEV_UP && event != NETDEV_CHANGE)
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry(q, &taprio_list, taprio_list) {
 		if (dev != qdisc_dev(q->root))
 			continue;
@@ -1328,16 +1329,17 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
 
 		stab = rtnl_dereference(q->root->stab);
 
-		oper = rtnl_dereference(q->oper_sched);
+		oper = rcu_dereference(q->oper_sched);
 		if (oper)
 			taprio_update_queue_max_sdu(q, oper, stab);
 
-		admin = rtnl_dereference(q->admin_sched);
+		admin = rcu_dereference(q->admin_sched);
 		if (admin)
 			taprio_update_queue_max_sdu(q, admin, stab);
 
 		break;
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH v2] net/sched: fix use-after-free in taprio_dev_notifier

[Eric Dumazet]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 4:17 AM Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Since taprio’s taprio_dev_notifier() isn’t protected by an
> RCU read-side critical section, a race with advance_sched()
> can lead to a use-after-free.
>
> Adding rcu_read_lock() inside taprio_dev_notifier() prevents this.
>
> Fixes: fed87cc6718a ("net/sched: taprio: automatically calculate queueMaxSDU based on TC gate durations")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

Re: [PATCH v2] net/sched: fix use-after-free in taprio_dev_notifier

[Cong Wang]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 07:16:55AM -0400, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> index 14021b812329..bd2b02d1dc63 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> @@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
>  	if (event != NETDEV_UP && event != NETDEV_CHANGE)
>  		return NOTIFY_DONE;
>  
> +	rcu_read_lock();
>  	list_for_each_entry(q, &taprio_list, taprio_list) {
>  		if (dev != qdisc_dev(q->root))
>  			continue;
> @@ -1328,16 +1329,17 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,

There is a taprio_set_picos_per_byte() call here, it calls
__ethtool_get_link_ksettings() which could be blocking.

For instance, gve_get_link_ksettings() calls
gve_adminq_report_link_speed() which is a blocking function.

So I am afraid we can't enforce an atomic context here.

Sorry.
Cong

Re: [PATCH v2] net/sched: fix use-after-free in taprio_dev_notifier

[Hyunwoo Kim]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 01:23:38PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 07:16:55AM -0400, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > index 14021b812329..bd2b02d1dc63 100644
> > --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > @@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> >  	if (event != NETDEV_UP && event != NETDEV_CHANGE)
> >  		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> >  
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> >  	list_for_each_entry(q, &taprio_list, taprio_list) {
> >  		if (dev != qdisc_dev(q->root))
> >  			continue;
> > @@ -1328,16 +1329,17 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> 
> There is a taprio_set_picos_per_byte() call here, it calls
> __ethtool_get_link_ksettings() which could be blocking.
> 
> For instance, gve_get_link_ksettings() calls
> gve_adminq_report_link_speed() which is a blocking function.
> 
> So I am afraid we can't enforce an atomic context here.

In that case, how about moving the lock as follows so that 
taprio_set_picos_per_byte() isn’t included within it?

```
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
index 14021b812329..2b14c81a87e5 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
@@ -1328,13 +1328,15 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,

                stab = rtnl_dereference(q->root->stab);

-               oper = rtnl_dereference(q->oper_sched);
+               rcu_read_lock();
+               oper = rcu_dereference(q->oper_sched);
                if (oper)
                        taprio_update_queue_max_sdu(q, oper, stab);

-               admin = rtnl_dereference(q->admin_sched);
+               admin = rcu_dereference(q->admin_sched);
                if (admin)
                        taprio_update_queue_max_sdu(q, admin, stab);
+               rcu_read_unlock();

                break;
        }
```

This change still prevents the race condition with advance_sched().

> 
> Sorry.
> Cong

Re: [PATCH v2] net/sched: fix use-after-free in taprio_dev_notifier

[Vladimir Oltean]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 01:23:38PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 07:16:55AM -0400, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > index 14021b812329..bd2b02d1dc63 100644
> > --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > @@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> >  	if (event != NETDEV_UP && event != NETDEV_CHANGE)
> >  		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> >  
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> >  	list_for_each_entry(q, &taprio_list, taprio_list) {
> >  		if (dev != qdisc_dev(q->root))
> >  			continue;
> > @@ -1328,16 +1329,17 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> 
> There is a taprio_set_picos_per_byte() call here, it calls
> __ethtool_get_link_ksettings() which could be blocking.
> 
> For instance, gve_get_link_ksettings() calls
> gve_adminq_report_link_speed() which is a blocking function.
> 
> So I am afraid we can't enforce an atomic context here.
> 
> Sorry.
> Cong

Yeah, and phylib's phy_ethtool_ksettings_get() acquires the
&phydev->lock mutex, which is sleepable. Agreed that this won't work,
good catch.

Re: [PATCH v2] net/sched: fix use-after-free in taprio_dev_notifier

[Vladimir Oltean]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 11:36:12PM -0400, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 01:23:38PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 07:16:55AM -0400, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> > > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > > index 14021b812329..bd2b02d1dc63 100644
> > > --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > > +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > > @@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> > >     if (event != NETDEV_UP && event != NETDEV_CHANGE)
> > >             return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > >
> > > +   rcu_read_lock();
> > >     list_for_each_entry(q, &taprio_list, taprio_list) {
> > >             if (dev != qdisc_dev(q->root))
> > >                     continue;
> > > @@ -1328,16 +1329,17 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> >
> > There is a taprio_set_picos_per_byte() call here, it calls
> > __ethtool_get_link_ksettings() which could be blocking.
> >
> > For instance, gve_get_link_ksettings() calls
> > gve_adminq_report_link_speed() which is a blocking function.
> >
> > So I am afraid we can't enforce an atomic context here.
> 
> In that case, how about moving the lock as follows so that
> taprio_set_picos_per_byte() isn’t included within it?
> 
> ```
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> index 14021b812329..2b14c81a87e5 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> @@ -1328,13 +1328,15 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> 
>                 stab = rtnl_dereference(q->root->stab);
> 
> -               oper = rtnl_dereference(q->oper_sched);
> +               rcu_read_lock();
> +               oper = rcu_dereference(q->oper_sched);
>                 if (oper)
>                         taprio_update_queue_max_sdu(q, oper, stab);
> 
> -               admin = rtnl_dereference(q->admin_sched);
> +               admin = rcu_dereference(q->admin_sched);
>                 if (admin)
>                         taprio_update_queue_max_sdu(q, admin, stab);
> +               rcu_read_unlock();
> 
>                 break;
>         }
> ```
> 
> This change still prevents the race condition with advance_sched().

This should work.

And I'm sorry for the bug introduced here, and elsewhere, by assuming
rtnl_dereference() will be fine.
I mostly use taprio with offload, where switch_schedules() runs in
process context with rtnl_lock() held, not the software emulation that
changes the schedules from the advance_sched() hrtimer. Somehow the
different locking requirements for the 2 cases eluded me.

Re: [PATCH v2] net/sched: fix use-after-free in taprio_dev_notifier

[Hyunwoo Kim]

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 11:52:06PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 11:36:12PM -0400, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 01:23:38PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 07:16:55AM -0400, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > > > index 14021b812329..bd2b02d1dc63 100644
> > > > --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > > > +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > > > @@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> > > >     if (event != NETDEV_UP && event != NETDEV_CHANGE)
> > > >             return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > >
> > > > +   rcu_read_lock();
> > > >     list_for_each_entry(q, &taprio_list, taprio_list) {
> > > >             if (dev != qdisc_dev(q->root))
> > > >                     continue;
> > > > @@ -1328,16 +1329,17 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> > >
> > > There is a taprio_set_picos_per_byte() call here, it calls
> > > __ethtool_get_link_ksettings() which could be blocking.
> > >
> > > For instance, gve_get_link_ksettings() calls
> > > gve_adminq_report_link_speed() which is a blocking function.
> > >
> > > So I am afraid we can't enforce an atomic context here.
> > 
> > In that case, how about moving the lock as follows so that
> > taprio_set_picos_per_byte() isn’t included within it?
> > 
> > ```
> > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > index 14021b812329..2b14c81a87e5 100644
> > --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > @@ -1328,13 +1328,15 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> > 
> >                 stab = rtnl_dereference(q->root->stab);
> > 
> > -               oper = rtnl_dereference(q->oper_sched);
> > +               rcu_read_lock();
> > +               oper = rcu_dereference(q->oper_sched);
> >                 if (oper)
> >                         taprio_update_queue_max_sdu(q, oper, stab);
> > 
> > -               admin = rtnl_dereference(q->admin_sched);
> > +               admin = rcu_dereference(q->admin_sched);
> >                 if (admin)
> >                         taprio_update_queue_max_sdu(q, admin, stab);
> > +               rcu_read_unlock();
> > 
> >                 break;
> >         }
> > ```
> > 
> > This change still prevents the race condition with advance_sched().
> 
> This should work.

OK, I’ll submit the v3 patch.

> 
> And I'm sorry for the bug introduced here, and elsewhere, by assuming
> rtnl_dereference() will be fine.
> I mostly use taprio with offload, where switch_schedules() runs in
> process context with rtnl_lock() held, not the software emulation that
> changes the schedules from the advance_sched() hrtimer. Somehow the
> different locking requirements for the 2 cases eluded me.