* Re: [BUG] bpf, sockmap: spurious wakeup by tcp_msg_wait_data() causing unexpected EAGAIN in recvfrom()
[not found] ` <20260709185526.E4DAB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
@ 2026-07-10 20:17 ` Nnamdi Onyeyiri
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nnamdi Onyeyiri @ 2026-07-10 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sashiko-reviews
Cc: bpf, netdev, john.fastabend, jakub, jiayuan.chen, edumazet,
ncardwell, kuniyu, davem, kuba, pabeni, horms
Hi,
The updated patch below addresses the issues raised by sashiko-bot. The closed
socket and signal handling code was added to tcp_bpf_recvmsg(), and the fix was
updated to work for sockets with SO_RCVTIMEO set.
Please let me know if any more changes are required, or if the patch would need
to be submitted some other way, I'm happy to adjust as necessary.
Thanks!
----8<----
From 20a1275aa5ecb927ff049971454b62682356ef0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nnamdi Onyeyiri <nnamdio@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 20:47:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] bpf, sockmap: handle spurious tcp_msg_wait_data()
wakeup
recvfrom()/recv() are documented as only returning EAGAIN for blocking sockets
when they have a receive timeout configured. however, adding a blocking
ipv4 tcp socket without a receive timeout to a sockmap will cause EAGAIN errors
sporadically. a socket with a receive timeout may return EAGAIN before the
timeout expires.
this happens when tcp_msg_wait_data() wakes spuriously (returning 0) in which
case, if there is no timeout, or the timeout has not yet expired, we loop
again instead of returning.
Signed-off-by: Nnamdi Onyeyiri <nnamdio@gmail.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
index cc0bd73f36b6..e3109edb9621 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir);
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
static int tcp_msg_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
- long timeo)
+ long *timeo)
{
DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
int ret = 0;
@@ -187,12 +187,12 @@ static int tcp_msg_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
return 1;
- if (!timeo)
+ if (!(*timeo))
return ret;
add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
sk_set_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA, sk);
- ret = sk_wait_event(sk, &timeo,
+ ret = sk_wait_event(sk, timeo,
!list_empty(&psock->ingress_msg) ||
!skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue), &wait);
sk_clear_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA, sk);
@@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk,
int copied_from_self = 0;
int copied = 0;
u32 seq;
+ long timeo;
if (unlikely(flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE))
return inet_recv_error(sk, msg, len);
@@ -262,6 +263,8 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk,
}
}
+ timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
+
msg_bytes_ready:
copied = __sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags, &copied_from_self);
/* The typical case for EFAULT is the socket was gracefully
@@ -280,7 +283,6 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk,
}
seq += copied_from_self;
if (!copied) {
- long timeo;
int data;
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE))
@@ -299,7 +301,6 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk,
goto out;
}
- timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
if (!timeo) {
copied = -EAGAIN;
goto out;
@@ -310,13 +311,15 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk,
goto out;
}
- data = tcp_msg_wait_data(sk, psock, timeo);
+ data = tcp_msg_wait_data(sk, psock, &timeo);
if (data < 0) {
copied = data;
goto unlock;
}
if (data && !sk_psock_queue_empty(psock))
goto msg_bytes_ready;
+ if (!data && timeo > 0)
+ goto msg_bytes_ready;
copied = -EAGAIN;
}
out:
@@ -355,6 +358,7 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
{
struct sk_psock *psock;
int copied, ret;
+ long timeo;
if (unlikely(flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE))
return inet_recv_error(sk, msg, len);
@@ -371,14 +375,45 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
return tcp_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
}
lock_sock(sk);
+
+ timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
+
msg_bytes_ready:
copied = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags);
if (!copied) {
- long timeo;
int data;
- timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
- data = tcp_msg_wait_data(sk, psock, timeo);
+ if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE)) {
+ ret = 0;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ if (sk->sk_err) {
+ ret = sock_error(sk);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
+ ret = 0;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ if (sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE) {
+ ret = -ENOTCONN;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ if (!timeo) {
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ if (signal_pending(current)) {
+ ret = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ data = tcp_msg_wait_data(sk, psock, &timeo);
if (data < 0) {
ret = data;
goto unlock;
@@ -390,6 +425,8 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
return tcp_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
}
+ if (!data && timeo > 0)
+ goto msg_bytes_ready;
copied = -EAGAIN;
}
ret = copied;
--
2.52.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread