From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Qihang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, willemb@google.com,
daniel.zahka@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Qihang Tang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6 1/3] net: remove CAP_SYS_RAWIO zero-padding in dev_validate_header
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 08:16:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.1d1da452d95b8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804090016.33353-2-q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
Qihang wrote:
> From: Qihang Tang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
>
> dev_validate_header() reads dev->hard_header_len directly when
> zero-padding short link layer headers for CAP_SYS_RAWIO holders:
>
> if (capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) {
> memset(ll_header + len, 0, dev->hard_header_len - len);
> return true;
> }
>
> Packet send paths call dev_validate_header() on skbs whose headroom was
> allocated from an earlier hard_header_len read. If the device is
> reconfigured so that dev->hard_header_len increases before validation,
> the memset writes past the reserved buffer, an out-of-bounds write.
>
> This out-of-bounds write is masked in some SOCK_RAW paths today because
> the same concurrent increase can first make skb_push() exceed the
> reserved headroom and trigger skb_under_panic(). Remove the zero-padding
> branch before making those hard_header_len reads consistent, so the
> snapshot fixes do not turn a loud panic into a silent overwrite.
>
> This path is only reached for variable length L2 protocols, where
> len < hard_header_len but len >= min_header_len. No remaining in-tree
> variable length L2 protocol implements header_ops->validate, and the
> CAP_SYS_RAWIO bypass that zero-pads and accepts short headers has no
> real value beyond allowing testing of intentionally malformed input.
>
> Drop the CAP_SYS_RAWIO branch. The remaining reads of
> dev->hard_header_len in dev_validate_header() are comparisons only and
> have no memory safety impact.
>
> Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> Fixes: 2793a23aacbd ("net: validate variable length ll headers")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Qihang Tang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
For future patches: don't send new revisions as replies to existing threads.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 8:29 [PATCH net v5 0/2] packet: use consistent hard_header_len in send paths Qihang
2026-07-30 8:29 ` [PATCH net v5 1/2] packet: use consistent hard_header_len in non-ring " Qihang
2026-07-30 8:29 ` [PATCH net v5 2/2] packet: use consistent hard_header_len in TX_RING send path Qihang
2026-07-30 9:22 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-04 2:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-04 3:04 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-04 23:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-04 9:00 ` [PATCH net v6 0/3] net: fix hard_header_len races in packet send paths Qihang
2026-08-04 9:00 ` [PATCH net v6 1/3] net: remove CAP_SYS_RAWIO zero-padding in dev_validate_header Qihang
2026-08-04 12:16 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-08-04 23:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-04 9:32 ` [PATCH net v6 2/3] packet: use consistent hard_header_len in non-ring send paths Qihang
2026-08-04 9:33 ` [PATCH net v6 3/3] packet: use consistent hard_header_len in TX_RING send path Qihang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-05 12:57 [PATCH net v6 0/3] net: fix hard_header_len races in packet send paths Qihang
2026-08-05 12:57 ` [PATCH net v6 1/3] net: remove CAP_SYS_RAWIO zero-padding in dev_validate_header Qihang
2026-08-06 3:07 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.1d1da452d95b8@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox