* ROUTE
@ 2008-02-05 10:14 Brent Clark
2008-02-05 11:41 ` ROUTE Rob Sterenborg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brent Clark @ 2008-02-05 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Hi all
Its been a while since i have been on this list, I trust everyone is
good and well.
I need to compile the 2.6.24 kernel, but with POMS ROUTE.
Im seeing that Route is not the lastest POM.
If i may ask is there a reason for this, or is there a better way to
route traffic out a different interface.
If anyone could assist, thanks in advance.
Regards
Brent Clark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: ROUTE
2008-02-05 10:14 ROUTE Brent Clark
@ 2008-02-05 11:41 ` Rob Sterenborg
2008-02-05 12:38 ` ROUTE Brent Clark
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rob Sterenborg @ 2008-02-05 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
> Its been a while since i have been on this list, I trust everyone is
> good and well.
>
> I need to compile the 2.6.24 kernel, but with POMS ROUTE.
>
> Im seeing that Route is not the lastest POM.
>
> If i may ask is there a reason for this, or is there a better way to
> route traffic out a different interface.
The module is removed some time ago and although I don't know the exact
reason, I can imagine it has to do with maintaining it but of course
there could be another reason.
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68781
You could mark the packets and route them using iproute2, but I don't
know if that would satisfy your needs. Or, if it's of use for you,
checkout the TEE target.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter/msg42319.html
http://dev.computergmbh.de/wsvn/misc_kernel/xt_TEE/
Grts,
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: ROUTE
2008-02-05 11:41 ` ROUTE Rob Sterenborg
@ 2008-02-05 12:38 ` Brent Clark
2008-02-05 12:51 ` ROUTE Rob Sterenborg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brent Clark @ 2008-02-05 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Rob Sterenborg wrote:
>
> The module is removed some time ago and although I don't know the exact
> reason, I can imagine it has to do with maintaining it but of course
> there could be another reason.
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68781
>
> You could mark the packets and route them using iproute2, but I don't
> know if that would satisfy your needs. Or, if it's of use for you,
> checkout the TEE target.
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter/msg42319.html
> http://dev.computergmbh.de/wsvn/misc_kernel/xt_TEE/
>
Thank you for your reply.
Most odd / co-incidental.
root@zion:/usr/src/patch-o-matic-ng-20080130# ./runme --download
Successfully downloaded external patch geoip
Successfully downloaded external patch condition
Successfully downloaded external patch IPMARK
Successfully downloaded external patch ROUTE <- And here it is.
Successfully downloaded external patch connlimit
Successfully downloaded external patch ipp2p
Successfully downloaded external patch time
./patchlets/ipv4options exists and is not external
./patchlets/TARPIT exists and is not external
Successfully downloaded external patch ACCOUNT
Successfully downloaded external patch pknock
Hey! KERNEL_DIR is not set.
But i still want to try your advised route. Will be fun.
Thanks again.
Brent Clark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: ROUTE
2008-02-05 12:38 ` ROUTE Brent Clark
@ 2008-02-05 12:51 ` Rob Sterenborg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rob Sterenborg @ 2008-02-05 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
> Most odd / co-incidental.
>
> root@zion:/usr/src/patch-o-matic-ng-20080130# ./runme --download
> Successfully downloaded external patch geoip
> Successfully downloaded external patch condition
> Successfully downloaded external patch IPMARK
> Successfully downloaded external patch ROUTE <- And here it is.
Yes, but it won't work if your kernel is recent: when pom-ng starts, you
will not be asked to patch the kernel for ROUTE.
> Successfully downloaded external patch connlimit
> Successfully downloaded external patch ipp2p
> Successfully downloaded external patch time
> ./patchlets/ipv4options exists and is not external
> ./patchlets/TARPIT exists and is not external
> Successfully downloaded external patch ACCOUNT
> Successfully downloaded external patch pknock
> Hey! KERNEL_DIR is not set.
Try:
IPTABLES_DIR="/path/to/iptables-source" \
KERNEL_DIR="/path/to/kernel-source" \
./runme --download
> But i still want to try your advised route. Will be fun.
Good luck. :-)
Grts,
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-05 12:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-05 10:14 ROUTE Brent Clark
2008-02-05 11:41 ` ROUTE Rob Sterenborg
2008-02-05 12:38 ` ROUTE Brent Clark
2008-02-05 12:51 ` ROUTE Rob Sterenborg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox