Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Performance Decrease
@ 2003-05-06 20:54 Shawn Mall
  2003-05-11 23:36 ` P.Italiaander
  2003-05-12  4:49 ` Dharmendra.T
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Mall @ 2003-05-06 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 519 bytes --]

I am running iptables version 1.2.2 -- This has never been an issue until I have begun to do some bandwidth intensive stuff. I also had a friend of mine point this out as well...

There seems to be a huge performance decrease when using iptables. I am not sure where the bottleneck is occuring. My friend has a 3Mbit/sec pipe, was getting about 500kb/sec on average, and since implenting iptables, is only receiving about 50kb/sec. That is a huge decrease. Can anybody point out what is going wrong?

Thanks,
Shawn

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1066 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Performance Decrease
  2003-05-06 20:54 Performance Decrease Shawn Mall
@ 2003-05-11 23:36 ` P.Italiaander
  2003-05-12  4:49 ` Dharmendra.T
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: P.Italiaander @ 2003-05-11 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

Op dinsdag 6 mei 2003 22:54, schreef Shawn Mall:
> I am running iptables version 1.2.2 -- This has never been an issue until I
> have begun to do some bandwidth intensive stuff. I also had a friend of
> mine point this out as well...
>
> There seems to be a huge performance decrease when using iptables. I am not
> sure where the bottleneck is occuring. My friend has a 3Mbit/sec pipe, was
> getting about 500kb/sec on average, and since implenting iptables, is only
> receiving about 50kb/sec. That is a huge decrease. Can anybody point out
> what is going wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
 
need more info on rule-set for this.

Perhaps a faulty rule with an 'limit' and high burst max,  so instead that 
limiting from outside (like Pings of Death) , you limit your own connection.


Pascal
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Performance Decrease
  2003-05-06 20:54 Performance Decrease Shawn Mall
  2003-05-11 23:36 ` P.Italiaander
@ 2003-05-12  4:49 ` Dharmendra.T
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dharmendra.T @ 2003-05-12  4:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shawn Mall; +Cc: netfilter

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1048 bytes --]

On Wed, 2003-05-07 at 02:24, Shawn Mall wrote:

    I am running iptables version 1.2.2 -- This has never been an issue
    until I have begun to do some bandwidth intensive stuff. I also had
    a friend of mine point this out as well...
     
    There seems to be a huge performance decrease when using iptables. I
    am not sure where the bottleneck is occuring. My friend has a
    3Mbit/sec pipe, was getting about 500kb/sec on average, and since
    implenting iptables, is only receiving about 50kb/sec. That is a
    huge decrease. Can anybody point out what is going wrong?
     
    Thanks,
    Shawn

HI 

What bandwidth intessive stuff you have done? I have not heard so far
that using iptables will reduce the bandwidth! 
:)
-- 
Regards
Dharmendra.T


This message is intended for the addressee only. It may contain
privileged or Confidential information. If you have received this
message in error,please notify the sender and destroy the message
immediately.Unauthorised use or reproduction of this message is strictly
prohibited.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1905 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-12  4:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-06 20:54 Performance Decrease Shawn Mall
2003-05-11 23:36 ` P.Italiaander
2003-05-12  4:49 ` Dharmendra.T

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox