Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Filip Sneppe <filip.sneppe@cronos.be>
To: Christian Hammers <ch@westend.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: /proc/net/ip_conntrack filling without ipt_conntrack.o loaded?
Date: 14 Jan 2003 14:43:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1042551825.465.143.camel@xbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030114121232.GA3362@westend.com>

On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 13:12, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I had ipt_conntrack.o loaded (see last mail) and then removed. But still
> my /proc/net/ip_conntrack got filled up.
> Then I did "echo '10000' > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max" and it 
> still raised.
> Now, after waiting 10min or so the values are slightly falling (I had
> fear that it crashed when reaching 0xffff)..
> 
> Are the first two events signs for a bug or is it expected behaviour
> that somehow the conntrack code remains in the kernel even if the module
> has been removed?

You sure it's not due to a typo ? It's ip_conntrack.o, not
ipt_conntrack. After an rmmod, what does lsmod say ?

About the high nuber of tracked connections, are you
talking about /proc/net/ip_conntrack ?

Before thinking of a bug, you should get a clear view of
the type of traffic filling your connection tracking table.
broadcasts ? Are these primarily ESTABLISHED connections,
or UNREPLIED connections ? Are nimda infected IIS boxes
scanning the whole ipv4 address range through your machine ?
It takes only a couple of infected machines to generate a
lot of traffic.

So, what's the nature of the entries in /proc/net/ip_conntrack ?

Regards,
Filip
 




  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-14 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-14  9:37 filtering asym. routing without "ip_conntrack: table full"? Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 12:12 ` /proc/net/ip_conntrack filling without ipt_conntrack.o loaded? Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 13:43   ` Filip Sneppe [this message]
2003-01-14 15:06     ` Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 15:49       ` Filip Sneppe
2003-01-14 16:01         ` Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 16:09           ` Filip Sneppe
2003-01-14 16:37             ` Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 16:58               ` Filip Sneppe
2003-01-21  6:16 ` filtering asym. routing without "ip_conntrack: table full"? ard-netfilter
2003-01-21 10:45   ` Jakub Jakacki
2003-01-29  2:14     ` Arnt Karlsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1042551825.465.143.camel@xbox \
    --to=filip.sneppe@cronos.be \
    --cc=ch@westend.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox