Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Hammers <ch@westend.com>
To: Filip Sneppe <filip.sneppe@cronos.be>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: /proc/net/ip_conntrack filling without ipt_conntrack.o loaded?
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:37:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030114163734.GB19620@westend.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1042560593.464.862.camel@xbox>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:09:53PM +0100, Filip Sneppe wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 17:01, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > Yes, thought so, too. - The question that I was trying to ask in this
> > thread was, why the /proc/net/ip_conntrack is filled by the kernel
> > although I *already did* remove the module!
> 
> What kernel version are you running ? modutils version ?
Kernel-2.4.20. modprobe-2.4.15. Debian 3.0 woody distribution.

> Is this reproducable upon every reboot ?
I'm not allowed to reboot it :-) But it's still reproducible that 
after decreasing with about 1000 per minute the value of
/proc/net/ip_conntrack has now stabilized around the
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ipt_conntrack_max value which is currently 10000 
(was 65520 and filled up to ca. 50000)

> I've been giving it a few tries on my machine, and 
> ip_conntrack disappears nicely from /proc/net upon
> unloads/reloads of ip_conntrack, even
> with unreplied connections pending.
Hmm :) 
Maybe you should set your machine unter a load of at least 4mbit/s 
with random IPs. This was the amount of traffic my router had when I
reloaded the firewall rule script with a "rmmod" at the beginning.

bye,

-christian-

-- 
Christian Hammers             WESTEND GmbH  |  Internet-Business-Provider
Technik                       CISCO Systems Partner - Authorized Reseller
                              Lütticher Strasse 10     Tel 0241/701333-11
ch@westend.com                D-52064 Aachen              Fax 0241/911879



  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-14 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-14  9:37 filtering asym. routing without "ip_conntrack: table full"? Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 12:12 ` /proc/net/ip_conntrack filling without ipt_conntrack.o loaded? Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 13:43   ` Filip Sneppe
2003-01-14 15:06     ` Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 15:49       ` Filip Sneppe
2003-01-14 16:01         ` Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 16:09           ` Filip Sneppe
2003-01-14 16:37             ` Christian Hammers [this message]
2003-01-14 16:58               ` Filip Sneppe
2003-01-21  6:16 ` filtering asym. routing without "ip_conntrack: table full"? ard-netfilter
2003-01-21 10:45   ` Jakub Jakacki
2003-01-29  2:14     ` Arnt Karlsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030114163734.GB19620@westend.com \
    --to=ch@westend.com \
    --cc=filip.sneppe@cronos.be \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox