Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Filip Sneppe <filip.sneppe@cronos.be>
To: Christian Hammers <ch@westend.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: /proc/net/ip_conntrack filling without ipt_conntrack.o loaded?
Date: 14 Jan 2003 17:58:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1042563532.465.1024.camel@xbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030114163734.GB19620@westend.com>

On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 17:37, Christian Hammers wrote:

> Kernel-2.4.20. modprobe-2.4.15. Debian 3.0 woody distribution.
>
> > Is this reproducable upon every reboot ?
> I'm not allowed to reboot it :-) But it's still reproducible that 
> after decreasing with about 1000 per minute the value of
> /proc/net/ip_conntrack has now stabilized around the
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ipt_conntrack_max value which is currently 10000 
> (was 65520 and filled up to ca. 50000)

Since you haven't rebooted it, you will continue to have this
problem as basically your running kernel+ip_conntrack is
basically screwed until you reboot the box. 

> Hmm :) 
> Maybe you should set your machine unter a load of at least 4mbit/s 
> with random IPs. This was the amount of traffic my router had when I
> reloaded the firewall rule script with a "rmmod" at the beginning.

I think you're absolutely right that by unloading ip_conntrack
while the box is handling packets gives you a greater chance
of triggering a problem. I remember having this kind of problem
occasionally with NIC drivers and ip_conntrack_ftp.

See also this item on the netfilter TODO list:

TO BE INVESTIGATED:
[...]
- ip_conntrack rmmod loop (sometimes, Yan's patch?)
   
Could be your problem, couldn't it ?
Not a lot I can say to help you any further though...
If you can reproduce this, you may inform netfilter-devel
of your workload and test scenario, which could help
developers. Is your firewall an SMP (multiprocessor)
machine, by any chance ?

Regards,
Filip






  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-14 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-14  9:37 filtering asym. routing without "ip_conntrack: table full"? Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 12:12 ` /proc/net/ip_conntrack filling without ipt_conntrack.o loaded? Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 13:43   ` Filip Sneppe
2003-01-14 15:06     ` Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 15:49       ` Filip Sneppe
2003-01-14 16:01         ` Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 16:09           ` Filip Sneppe
2003-01-14 16:37             ` Christian Hammers
2003-01-14 16:58               ` Filip Sneppe [this message]
2003-01-21  6:16 ` filtering asym. routing without "ip_conntrack: table full"? ard-netfilter
2003-01-21 10:45   ` Jakub Jakacki
2003-01-29  2:14     ` Arnt Karlsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1042563532.465.1024.camel@xbox \
    --to=filip.sneppe@cronos.be \
    --cc=ch@westend.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox