Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Bridge+Bandwidth Control
@ 2003-04-11  0:02 Hernán Mailluquet
  2003-04-11  5:43 ` Dharmendra.T
  2003-04-11 23:54 ` Arnt Karlsen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hernán Mailluquet @ 2003-04-11  0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

Hi!

I was trying to implement traffic control on a linux
bridge. Basically, I'll need to allocate designated bandwidth
to various services while the rest get throttled.

Eg. on a 10MBit bandwidth.
http/ftp will get 128K
while the rest (smtp/POP3) will get 64K.
Whatever traffic passing through the bridge
in one direction must not exceed 192K.

To my dismay, I realised that firewall marking classifier
will not work under bridging mode.

So right now I'm kind of stuck because of that.

Can someone tell me whether if I can implement something like
the above?

Thanks.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Bridge+Bandwidth Control
  2003-04-11  0:02 Bridge+Bandwidth Control Hernán Mailluquet
@ 2003-04-11  5:43 ` Dharmendra.T
  2003-04-11 23:54 ` Arnt Karlsen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dharmendra.T @ 2003-04-11  5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hernán Mailluquet; +Cc: netfilter

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 845 bytes --]

On Fri, 2003-04-11 at 05:32, Hernán Mailluquet wrote:

    Hi!
    
    I was trying to implement traffic control on a linux
    bridge. Basically, I'll need to allocate designated bandwidth
    to various services while the rest get throttled.
    
    Eg. on a 10MBit bandwidth.
    http/ftp will get 128K
    while the rest (smtp/POP3) will get 64K.
    Whatever traffic passing through the bridge
    in one direction must not exceed 192K.
    
    To my dismay, I realised that firewall marking classifier
    will not work under bridging mode.
    
    So right now I'm kind of stuck because of that.
    
    Can someone tell me whether if I can implement something like
    the above?
    
    Thanks.
    
    Hi

Why don't you try implimenting traffic controller (iproute)?
-- 
Regards
Dharmendra.T




[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2413 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Bridge+Bandwidth Control
  2003-04-11  0:02 Bridge+Bandwidth Control Hernán Mailluquet
  2003-04-11  5:43 ` Dharmendra.T
@ 2003-04-11 23:54 ` Arnt Karlsen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arnt Karlsen @ 2003-04-11 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 02:02:01 +0200, 
<000d01c2ffbd$947bac30$010aa8c0@crz2>:

> Hi!
> 
> I was trying to implement traffic control on a linux
> bridge. Basically, I'll need to allocate designated bandwidth
> to various services while the rest get throttled.
> 
> Eg. on a 10MBit bandwidth.
> http/ftp will get 128K
> while the rest (smtp/POP3) will get 64K.
> Whatever traffic passing through the bridge
> in one direction must not exceed 192K.
> 
> To my dismay, I realised that firewall marking classifier
> will not work under bridging mode.
> 
> So right now I'm kind of stuck because of that.
> 
> Can someone tell me whether if I can implement something like
> the above?

..my first throttle box hangs an ip-less bridge outside my isp clients
firewall, (to control bandwidth for his 802.11 linked customers), how 
is your setup ?


-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-11 23:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-11  0:02 Bridge+Bandwidth Control Hernán Mailluquet
2003-04-11  5:43 ` Dharmendra.T
2003-04-11 23:54 ` Arnt Karlsen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox