* Loose source routed IP packets.
@ 2003-09-23 11:47 Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó
2003-09-23 12:12 ` Maciej Soltysiak
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó @ 2003-09-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Netfilter
Hi,
Is it possible to drop ICMP loose source routed IP packets ?
How ?
Greetings.
---
Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó
carles@unlimitedmail.org
http://www.unlimitedmail.net/
---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Loose source routed IP packets.
2003-09-23 11:47 Loose source routed IP packets Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó
@ 2003-09-23 12:12 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-09-23 12:31 ` Ray Leach
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maciej Soltysiak @ 2003-09-23 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó; +Cc: Netfilter
> Hi,
> Is it possible to drop ICMP loose source routed IP packets ?
> How ?
Try Fabrice Marie's ipv4options match from patch-o-matic, you would then
do a:
# iptables -A INPUT -p icmp -m ipv4options --lsrr -j DROP
Regards,
Maciej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Loose source routed IP packets.
2003-09-23 12:12 ` Maciej Soltysiak
@ 2003-09-23 12:31 ` Ray Leach
2003-09-23 13:22 ` Chris Brenton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ray Leach @ 2003-09-23 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Netfilter Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 698 bytes --]
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 14:12, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is it possible to drop ICMP loose source routed IP packets ?
> > How ?
> Try Fabrice Marie's ipv4options match from patch-o-matic, you would then
> do a:
> # iptables -A INPUT -p icmp -m ipv4options --lsrr -j DROP
>
> Regards,
> Maciej
How about :
### don't accept source routed packets
/bin/echo "0" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/accept_source_route
Ray
--
--
Raymond Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
Network Support Specialist
http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za
"lynx -source http://www.rchq.co.za/raymondl.asc | gpg --import"
Key fingerprint = 7209 A695 9EE0 E971 A9AD 00EE 8757 EE47 F06F FB28
--
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Loose source routed IP packets.
2003-09-23 12:31 ` Ray Leach
@ 2003-09-23 13:22 ` Chris Brenton
2003-09-23 13:37 ` Ray Leach
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Brenton @ 2003-09-23 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ray Leach; +Cc: Netfilter Mailing List
Ray Leach wrote:
>
> How about :
> ### don't accept source routed packets
> /bin/echo "0" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/accept_source_route
I keep meaning to do some testing with this but have not had the
bandwidth. Just wondering if anyone else actually has.
I would expect the above would work fine with strict source routing, but
I'm not so sure about loose source routing unless the firewall was one
of the defined jump points.
For example, let's say I know you "trust" some IP address on the
Internet and permit a greater level of access from it to one of your
internal systems. I craft the following packet:
source IP = mine
Dest IP = "trusted" Internet host
First byte of IP options = 83
IP in options field = your internal server
In this case none of the IPs are the firewalls so I'm not so sure
accept_source_route would even be referenced. Does the kernel check the
size of all IP headers and process the included options even if its not
the destination IP? I would think it would not for efficiency, but then
again it might to deal with things like option 7 (record route).
Has anyone tested this either way?
Thanks in advance!
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Loose source routed IP packets.
2003-09-23 13:22 ` Chris Brenton
@ 2003-09-23 13:37 ` Ray Leach
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ray Leach @ 2003-09-23 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Brenton; +Cc: Netfilter Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1635 bytes --]
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 15:22, Chris Brenton wrote:
> Ray Leach wrote:
> >
> > How about :
> > ### don't accept source routed packets
> > /bin/echo "0" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/accept_source_route
>
> I keep meaning to do some testing with this but have not had the
> bandwidth. Just wondering if anyone else actually has.
>
> I would expect the above would work fine with strict source routing, but
> I'm not so sure about loose source routing unless the firewall was one
> of the defined jump points.
>
> For example, let's say I know you "trust" some IP address on the
> Internet and permit a greater level of access from it to one of your
> internal systems. I craft the following packet:
>
> source IP = mine
> Dest IP = "trusted" Internet host
> First byte of IP options = 83
> IP in options field = your internal server
>
> In this case none of the IPs are the firewalls so I'm not so sure
> accept_source_route would even be referenced. Does the kernel check the
> size of all IP headers and process the included options even if its not
> the destination IP? I would think it would not for efficiency, but then
> again it might to deal with things like option 7 (record route).
>
> Has anyone tested this either way?
>
I suppose the easy answer is to check the kernel source code.
> Thanks in advance!
> Chris
--
--
Raymond Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
Network Support Specialist
http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za
"lynx -source http://www.rchq.co.za/raymondl.asc | gpg --import"
Key fingerprint = 7209 A695 9EE0 E971 A9AD 00EE 8757 EE47 F06F FB28
--
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-23 13:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-23 11:47 Loose source routed IP packets Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó
2003-09-23 12:12 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-09-23 12:31 ` Ray Leach
2003-09-23 13:22 ` Chris Brenton
2003-09-23 13:37 ` Ray Leach
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox