From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Bernhard Bock <mailinglists@bock.nu>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: conntrackd failover works partially, was Re: conntrack performance test results in INVALID packets
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:13:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48BE5547.8030505@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48BD6FEC.5090100@bock.nu>
Bernhard Bock wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>> During the fail-over, keepalived recovers the virtual IPs and conntrackd
>> commits the states into the kernel. The commit takes very short but you
>> can still lose some packets if the state is not yet present in the
>> kernel - thus, these packets are logged as invalid and dropped as we
>> don't find any matching state (with a sane stateful rule-set, of
>> course). *However*, the TCP sessions should recover as the peer or the
>> server retransmits the packet in short, so I don't understand why you
>> lose nearly all the sessions.
>
> Agreed. My problem is, it doesn't recover. It keeps dropping packets as
> long as the test runs (the test stops at some point in time with socket
> timeouts).
Hm, I remember that the problem reported with RHEL kernel was similar.
That user assured me that the state entries were successfully committed
- ie. he could verify that conntrack -L displays them - but the packets
were not matching the injected states, thus, leading to invalid logs and
drops. He ended up changing to Ubuntu. However, if it is a Fedora/RHEL
problem, it would be nice to know what's wrong with it.
>> Is the firewall sending RST packets to the peer/server to close
>> connections? If so, I remember a similar report with a RHEL kernel:
>
> Will check tomorrow.
OK, wait for your news.
--
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-03 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-18 9:39 conntrack performance test results in INVALID packets Bernhard Bock
2008-07-18 10:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-18 10:52 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-07-18 12:14 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-18 14:20 ` conntrackd failover works partially, was " Bernhard Bock
2008-07-21 0:37 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-21 14:22 ` conntrackd failover works partially Bernhard Bock
2008-07-23 8:51 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-07-23 12:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-23 15:20 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-08-08 8:47 ` conntrackd failover works partially, was Re: conntrack performance test results in INVALID packets Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-08-08 12:58 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-02 9:39 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-02 9:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-02 12:34 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-02 12:48 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-02 15:18 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-02 16:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-02 16:55 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-03 9:13 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2008-09-03 11:26 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-04 12:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-04 13:27 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-05 10:55 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-04 11:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48BE5547.8030505@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=mailinglists@bock.nu \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox