From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Bernhard Bock <mailinglists@bock.nu>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: conntrackd failover works partially, was Re: conntrack performance test results in INVALID packets
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:55:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C1101E.10501@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48BFE25F.2080002@bock.nu>
Bernhard Bock wrote:
>> 1) does /var/log/conntrackd.log - or syslog - tells anything relevant?
>> Are the entries being comitted to kernel-space successfully?
>
> according to both conntrackd.log and syslog, entries are being commited.
> I see no relevant negative entries in both logs (except of course the
> INVALID packets).
>
>> 2) Can you see the committed entries in the kernel via `conntrack -L'
>> after the fail-over?
>
> yes.
>
>> 3) Are you noticing any abnormal CPU consumption?
>
> no.
Is there any pattern in the invalid log messages that your rule-set
matches during the fail-over?
Are the packets hitting invalid or new-not-syn in your rule-set?
Can you check if the packets that are logged as invalid have a
state-entry? Just take one of the log messages and do `conntrack -L -p
tcp --dport XYZW' to check if there is a state-entry about that
connection while it keeps logging the packet as such state-entry would
not exist.
Are you noticing state-entries marked as UNREPLIED in TCP states !=
SYN_SENT?
--
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-05 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-18 9:39 conntrack performance test results in INVALID packets Bernhard Bock
2008-07-18 10:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-18 10:52 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-07-18 12:14 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-18 14:20 ` conntrackd failover works partially, was " Bernhard Bock
2008-07-21 0:37 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-21 14:22 ` conntrackd failover works partially Bernhard Bock
2008-07-23 8:51 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-07-23 12:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-23 15:20 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-08-08 8:47 ` conntrackd failover works partially, was Re: conntrack performance test results in INVALID packets Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-08-08 12:58 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-02 9:39 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-02 9:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-02 12:34 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-02 12:48 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-02 15:18 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-02 16:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-02 16:55 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-03 9:13 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-03 11:26 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-04 12:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-04 13:27 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-05 10:55 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2008-09-04 11:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48C1101E.10501@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=mailinglists@bock.nu \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox