Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: statistic module
@ 2009-02-26 20:01 John Lister
  2009-02-26 20:49 ` Statistic module nth problem John Lister
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Lister @ 2009-02-26 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

with the old nth module you could specify a counter to use allowing you 
to  have multiple overlapping counts.

Is this possible with the new statistic module? If not is there a way 
round it?

Thanks

-- 
Got needs? Get Goblin'! - http://www.pricegoblin.co.uk/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Statistic module nth problem
  2009-02-26 20:01 statistic module John Lister
@ 2009-02-26 20:49 ` John Lister
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Lister @ 2009-02-26 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

I've played with the nth function of the statistic module and i can't 
seem to get it to work, This mirrors a previous post where it matches 
each entry once and then doesn't match any more...

looking at the source code makes me surprised it does this unless i've 
misunderstood completely...


from /net/netfilter/xt_statistic.c

static bool
statistic_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *in,
  const struct net_device *out, const struct xt_match *match,
  const void *matchinfo, int offset, unsigned int protoff,
  bool *hotdrop)
{
  struct xt_statistic_info *info = (struct xt_statistic_info *)matchinfo;
  bool ret = info->flags & XT_STATISTIC_INVERT;

  switch (info->mode) {
    case XT_STATISTIC_MODE_RANDOM:
    if ((net_random() & 0x7FFFFFFF) < info->u.random.probability)
      ret = !ret;
      break;
    case XT_STATISTIC_MODE_NTH:
      info = info->master;
      spin_lock_bh(&nth_lock);
      if (info->u.nth.count++ == info->u.nth.every) {
        info->u.nth.count = 0;
        ret = !ret;
      }
      spin_unlock_bh(&nth_lock);
      break;
    }

  return ret;
}


The second case should look like this - or have i missed something?
    case XT_STATISTIC_MODE_NTH:
      info = info->master;
      spin_lock_bh(&nth_lock);
      if (info->u.nth.count == info->u.nth.packet) {
        ret=!ret;
      }
      if (info->u.nth.count++ == info->u.nth.every) {
        info->u.nth.count = 0;
      }
      spin_unlock_bh(&nth_lock);
      break;


I'll submit a patch if anyone agrees and i'll also add stuff to handle 
multiple counts - why was this removed????

Thanks




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-26 20:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-26 20:01 statistic module John Lister
2009-02-26 20:49 ` Statistic module nth problem John Lister

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox