* Re: statistic module
@ 2009-02-26 20:01 John Lister
2009-02-26 20:49 ` Statistic module nth problem John Lister
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Lister @ 2009-02-26 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
with the old nth module you could specify a counter to use allowing you
to have multiple overlapping counts.
Is this possible with the new statistic module? If not is there a way
round it?
Thanks
--
Got needs? Get Goblin'! - http://www.pricegoblin.co.uk/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Statistic module nth problem
2009-02-26 20:01 statistic module John Lister
@ 2009-02-26 20:49 ` John Lister
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Lister @ 2009-02-26 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
I've played with the nth function of the statistic module and i can't
seem to get it to work, This mirrors a previous post where it matches
each entry once and then doesn't match any more...
looking at the source code makes me surprised it does this unless i've
misunderstood completely...
from /net/netfilter/xt_statistic.c
static bool
statistic_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *in,
const struct net_device *out, const struct xt_match *match,
const void *matchinfo, int offset, unsigned int protoff,
bool *hotdrop)
{
struct xt_statistic_info *info = (struct xt_statistic_info *)matchinfo;
bool ret = info->flags & XT_STATISTIC_INVERT;
switch (info->mode) {
case XT_STATISTIC_MODE_RANDOM:
if ((net_random() & 0x7FFFFFFF) < info->u.random.probability)
ret = !ret;
break;
case XT_STATISTIC_MODE_NTH:
info = info->master;
spin_lock_bh(&nth_lock);
if (info->u.nth.count++ == info->u.nth.every) {
info->u.nth.count = 0;
ret = !ret;
}
spin_unlock_bh(&nth_lock);
break;
}
return ret;
}
The second case should look like this - or have i missed something?
case XT_STATISTIC_MODE_NTH:
info = info->master;
spin_lock_bh(&nth_lock);
if (info->u.nth.count == info->u.nth.packet) {
ret=!ret;
}
if (info->u.nth.count++ == info->u.nth.every) {
info->u.nth.count = 0;
}
spin_unlock_bh(&nth_lock);
break;
I'll submit a patch if anyone agrees and i'll also add stuff to handle
multiple counts - why was this removed????
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-26 20:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-26 20:01 statistic module John Lister
2009-02-26 20:49 ` Statistic module nth problem John Lister
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox