Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Apps that try to do net-to-nat
@ 2004-01-30 20:11 Jago Pearce
  2004-01-30 20:40 ` John A. Sullivan III
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jago Pearce @ 2004-01-30 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter


I'm behind NAT at work and I need to connect to home, which is also behind 
NAT.

What programs have tried to get past the NAT problem? I heard that mnet, the 
p2p program uses a ticketing system to pass messages. Any other programs 
that have attempted to do nat-to-nat and done so successfully? In particular 
- VoIP?

-----
Thank you for your time. (Please Type "REPLY:" in subject field if you wish 
to highlight your response, thx).  jago25_98@catholic.org is just my email 
provider of choice, that's all; I agree with thier policies over email.

_________________________________________________________________
Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Apps that try to do net-to-nat
  2004-01-30 20:11 Apps that try to do net-to-nat Jago Pearce
@ 2004-01-30 20:40 ` John A. Sullivan III
  2004-01-30 20:53   ` Antony Stone
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: John A. Sullivan III @ 2004-01-30 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jago25_98; +Cc: netfilter

On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 15:11, Jago Pearce wrote:
> I'm behind NAT at work and I need to connect to home, which is also behind 
> NAT.
> 
> What programs have tried to get past the NAT problem? I heard that mnet, the 
> p2p program uses a ticketing system to pass messages. Any other programs 
> that have attempted to do nat-to-nat and done so successfully? In particular 
> - VoIP?
<snip>
I'm used to the VPN world so for me the obvious choice is to set up a
VPN tunnel between home and office.  Hopefully it's not a major concern
but an added benefit is that your VoIP is encrypted and not subject to
useful interception.  OpenS/WAN (http://www.openswan.org) should work
nicely if your are running Linux on your gateway.
-- 
John A. Sullivan III
Chief Technology Officer
Nexus Management
+1 207-985-7880
john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com
---
If you are interested in helping to develop a GPL enterprise class
VPN/Firewall/Security device management console, please visit
http://iscs.sourceforge.net 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Apps that try to do net-to-nat
  2004-01-30 20:40 ` John A. Sullivan III
@ 2004-01-30 20:53   ` Antony Stone
  2004-01-30 21:26     ` John A. Sullivan III
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Antony Stone @ 2004-01-30 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

On Friday 30 January 2004 8:40 pm, John A. Sullivan III wrote:

> On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 15:11, Jago Pearce wrote:
> > I'm behind NAT at work and I need to connect to home, which is also
> > behind NAT.
> >
> > What programs have tried to get past the NAT problem? I heard that mnet,
> > the p2p program uses a ticketing system to pass messages. Any other
> > programs that have attempted to do nat-to-nat and done so successfully?
> > In particular - VoIP?
>
> <snip>
> I'm used to the VPN world so for me the obvious choice is to set up a
> VPN tunnel between home and office.  Hopefully it's not a major concern
> but an added benefit is that your VoIP is encrypted and not subject to
> useful interception.  OpenS/WAN (http://www.openswan.org) should work
> nicely if your are running Linux on your gateway.

But, as a discussion on this list pointed out about a week ago, you can't do 
that if neither of the endpoints which you wish to communicate have publicly 
routable addresses.

I think to specify Jago's requirement slightly more explicitly, he has a 
machine at home, which is SNATted out to the Internet (and therefore cannot 
receive connections in from the Internet), and he has a machine at work which 
is in the same situation - it is SNATted behind a firewall so that the 
machine can connect to the Internet, but the Internet cannot connect to the 
machine.

Therefore the requirement here is to break the security policy of both his 
employer and his home ISP by linking together two machines which have been 
assigned non-routable addresses.

Regards,

Antony.

-- 
This email was created using 100% recycled electrons.

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Apps that try to do net-to-nat
  2004-01-30 20:53   ` Antony Stone
@ 2004-01-30 21:26     ` John A. Sullivan III
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: John A. Sullivan III @ 2004-01-30 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Antony Stone; +Cc: netfilter

On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 15:53, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Friday 30 January 2004 8:40 pm, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 15:11, Jago Pearce wrote:
> > > I'm behind NAT at work and I need to connect to home, which is also
> > > behind NAT.
> > >
> > > What programs have tried to get past the NAT problem? I heard that mnet,
> > > the p2p program uses a ticketing system to pass messages. Any other
> > > programs that have attempted to do nat-to-nat and done so successfully?
> > > In particular - VoIP?
> >
> > <snip>
> > I'm used to the VPN world so for me the obvious choice is to set up a
> > VPN tunnel between home and office.  Hopefully it's not a major concern
> > but an added benefit is that your VoIP is encrypted and not subject to
> > useful interception.  OpenS/WAN (http://www.openswan.org) should work
> > nicely if your are running Linux on your gateway.
> 
> But, as a discussion on this list pointed out about a week ago, you can't do 
> that if neither of the endpoints which you wish to communicate have publicly 
> routable addresses.
> 
> I think to specify Jago's requirement slightly more explicitly, he has a 
> machine at home, which is SNATted out to the Internet (and therefore cannot 
> receive connections in from the Internet), and he has a machine at work which 
> is in the same situation - it is SNATted behind a firewall so that the 
> machine can connect to the Internet, but the Internet cannot connect to the 
> machine.
> 
> Therefore the requirement here is to break the security policy of both his 
> employer and his home ISP by linking together two machines which have been 
> assigned non-routable addresses.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Antony.
I suppose it really depends on what he has where.  For example, if he is
at work on a Windows PC with a private address and needs to connect to a
home PC behind an iptables/openswan gateway, he can use a windows IPSec
client that supports NAT-Traversal, create a tunnel to the home gateway
and access the home PC or VoIP system or whatever he needs by using its
private address.  The tunnel will know that the private address lives on
the other side of the gateway's public address.  Of course, that may not
be the set up he has at all but it is one that will work along with
several variations on the same theme.
-- 
John A. Sullivan III
Chief Technology Officer
Nexus Management
+1 207-985-7880
john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-30 21:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-30 20:11 Apps that try to do net-to-nat Jago Pearce
2004-01-30 20:40 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-01-30 20:53   ` Antony Stone
2004-01-30 21:26     ` John A. Sullivan III

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox