From: Xue jiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: do not set OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING if nonblocking lock can not be granted at once
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:27:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <545C907A.4010706@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <545C6EAE.6030304@oracle.com>
On 2014/11/7 15:03, Junxiao Bi wrote:
> On 11/07/2014 02:36 PM, Xue jiufei wrote:
>> Hi Junxiao
>>
>> On 2014/11/7 13:54, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>>> Hi Jiufei,
>>>
>>> On 11/07/2014 11:41 AM, Xue jiufei wrote:
>>>> Function ocfs2_readpages() use nonblocking flag to avoid page lock
>>>> inversion. It will trigger cluster hang because that flag
>>>> OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING is not cleared if nonblocking lock
>>>> cannot be granted at once. The flag would prevent dc thread from
>>>> downconverting. So other nodes cannot acheive this lockres for ever.
>>>>
>>>> So we should not set OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING when receiving ast
>>>> if nonblocking lock had already returned.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Use OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED can't fix this issue. Like there are
>>> two processes doing non-blocking lock in the following order.
>> I am wondering why these two processes can lock in such order.
>
> Yes, you are right. LOCK_BUSY flag stop this race. Your fix works. But
> just as i mentioned, i think for non-blocking lock, no need do cluster
> wild locking, because AST is async, before it reached, most of the time,
> the non-blocking lock had returned fail.
We have added some debug information in function dlm_proxy_ast_handler()
and dlm_send_remote_lock_request(), and run race testcase before.
The result shows that the probability that AST message came earlier
than returned status of locking is about 1/4.
In addition, if non-blocking lock do not do cluster wide lock, ocfs2_readpages()
will never succeed, which is not we wanted.
Thanks,
Jiufei
>
> Thanks,
> Junxiao.
>>> 1. Process A issue non-blocking lock fail, set OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED.
>> We had set OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY flag before process A call ocfs2_dlm_lock(),
>>> 2. Process B issue non-blocking lock fail, set
>>> OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED again.
>> So process B must wait until ast for Process A returns and clear OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY.
>>
>>> 3. Ast for process A come, clear OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED.
>>> 4. Ast for process B come, set OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING.
>>>
>>> So down convert can still be blocked.
>>>
>>> To fix this issue, I think no need to call ocfs2_dlm_lock() for
>>> non-blocking lock, just check local lockres->l_level is enough, if
>>> request level equal or smaller than it, lock success, or lock fail.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Junxiao.
>>>
>> Thanks,
>> jiufei.
>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: joyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>> fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h | 6 ++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>>>> index 21262f2..1ddb6f1 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>>>> @@ -861,8 +861,13 @@ static inline void ocfs2_generic_handle_convert_action(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lo
>>>> * We set the OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING flag before clearing
>>>> * the OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY flag to prevent the dc thread from
>>>> * downconverting the lock before the upconvert has fully completed.
>>>> + * Do not prevent the dc thread from downconverting if NONBLOCK lock
>>>> + * had already returned.
>>>> */
>>>> - lockres_or_flags(lockres, OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING);
>>>> + if (!(lockres->l_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED))
>>>> + lockres_or_flags(lockres, OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING);
>>>> + else
>>>> + lockres_clear_flags(lockres, OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED);
>>>>
>>>> lockres_clear_flags(lockres, OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY);
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1324,13 +1329,12 @@ static void lockres_add_mask_waiter(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>>>
>>>> /* returns 0 if the mw that was removed was already satisfied, -EBUSY
>>>> * if the mask still hadn't reached its goal */
>>>> -static int lockres_remove_mask_waiter(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>>> +static int __lockres_remove_mask_waiter(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>>> struct ocfs2_mask_waiter *mw)
>>>> {
>>>> - unsigned long flags;
>>>> int ret = 0;
>>>>
>>>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
>>>> + assert_spin_locked(&lockres->l_lock);
>>>> if (!list_empty(&mw->mw_item)) {
>>>> if ((lockres->l_flags & mw->mw_mask) != mw->mw_goal)
>>>> ret = -EBUSY;
>>>> @@ -1338,6 +1342,18 @@ static int lockres_remove_mask_waiter(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>>> list_del_init(&mw->mw_item);
>>>> init_completion(&mw->mw_complete);
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int lockres_remove_mask_waiter(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>>> + struct ocfs2_mask_waiter *mw)
>>>> +{
>>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>>> + int ret = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
>>>> + ret = __lockres_remove_mask_waiter(lockres, mw);
>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
>>>>
>>>> return ret;
>>>> @@ -1373,6 +1389,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_cluster_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>> unsigned int gen;
>>>> int noqueue_attempted = 0;
>>>> + int dlm_locked = 0;
>>>>
>>>> ocfs2_init_mask_waiter(&mw);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -1481,6 +1498,7 @@ again:
>>>> ocfs2_recover_from_dlm_error(lockres, 1);
>>>> goto out;
>>>> }
>>>> + dlm_locked = 1;
>>>>
>>>> mlog(0, "lock %s, successful return from ocfs2_dlm_lock\n",
>>>> lockres->l_name);
>>>> @@ -1514,10 +1532,17 @@ out:
>>>> if (wait && arg_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK &&
>>>> mw.mw_mask & (OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY|OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED)) {
>>>> wait = 0;
>>>> - if (lockres_remove_mask_waiter(lockres, &mw))
>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
>>>> + if (__lockres_remove_mask_waiter(lockres, &mw)) {
>>>> + if (dlm_locked)
>>>> + lockres_or_flags(lockres,
>>>> + OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED);
>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
>>>> ret = -EAGAIN;
>>>> - else
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
>>>> goto again;
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>> if (wait) {
>>>> ret = ocfs2_wait_for_mask(&mw);
>>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
>>>> index bbec539..7d6b7d0 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
>>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
>>>> @@ -144,6 +144,12 @@ enum ocfs2_unlock_action {
>>>> * before the upconvert
>>>> * has completed */
>>>>
>>>> +#define OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED (0x00001000) /* NONBLOCK cluster
>>>> + * lock has already
>>>> + * returned, do not block
>>>> + * dc thread from
>>>> + * downconverting */
>>>> +
>>>> struct ocfs2_lock_res_ops;
>>>>
>>>> typedef void (*ocfs2_lock_callback)(int status, unsigned long data);
>>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-07 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-07 3:41 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: do not set OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING if nonblocking lock can not be granted at once Xue jiufei
2014-11-07 5:54 ` Junxiao Bi
2014-11-07 6:36 ` Xue jiufei
2014-11-07 7:03 ` Junxiao Bi
2014-11-07 9:27 ` Xue jiufei [this message]
2014-11-10 1:52 ` Junxiao Bi
2014-11-11 1:41 ` Xue jiufei
2014-11-11 3:59 ` Junxiao Bi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=545C907A.4010706@huawei.com \
--to=xuejiufei@huawei.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox