From: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: do not set OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING if nonblocking lock can not be granted at once
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:59:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54618994.8060800@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54616940.9020208@huawei.com>
On 11/11/2014 09:41 AM, Xue jiufei wrote:
> Hi JunXiao,
> On 2014/11/10 9:52, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>> On 11/07/2014 05:27 PM, Xue jiufei wrote:
>>> On 2014/11/7 15:03, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>>>> On 11/07/2014 02:36 PM, Xue jiufei wrote:
>>>>> Hi Junxiao
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2014/11/7 13:54, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Jiufei,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/07/2014 11:41 AM, Xue jiufei wrote:
>>>>>>> Function ocfs2_readpages() use nonblocking flag to avoid page lock
>>>>>>> inversion. It will trigger cluster hang because that flag
>>>>>>> OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING is not cleared if nonblocking lock
>>>>>>> cannot be granted at once. The flag would prevent dc thread from
>>>>>>> downconverting. So other nodes cannot acheive this lockres for ever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So we should not set OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING when receiving ast
>>>>>>> if nonblocking lock had already returned.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Use OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED can't fix this issue. Like there are
>>>>>> two processes doing non-blocking lock in the following order.
>>>>> I am wondering why these two processes can lock in such order.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you are right. LOCK_BUSY flag stop this race. Your fix works. But
>>>> just as i mentioned, i think for non-blocking lock, no need do cluster
>>>> wild locking, because AST is async, before it reached, most of the time,
>>>> the non-blocking lock had returned fail.
>>> We have added some debug information in function dlm_proxy_ast_handler()
>>> and dlm_send_remote_lock_request(), and run race testcase before.
>>> The result shows that the probability that AST message came earlier
>>> than returned status of locking is about 1/4.
>> That may depend on how your race testcase is made.
>>>
>>> In addition, if non-blocking lock do not do cluster wide lock, ocfs2_readpages()
>>> will never succeed,
>> Jiufei, can you explain why?
>>
> If node A takes EX lock, and node B call ocfs2_readpages(), which do not do cluster
> wide lock, master will not notice node A to downconvert. So even node B call ocfs2_readpages()
> many times, it will not succeed.
Not sure whether this will happen. As i thought, if there is read ahead
ops for this file, there should also be read op which can trigger the
down convert. Any way i think we'd better not depend on this.
Reviewed-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Junxiao.
>>
>> which is not we wanted.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jiufei
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Junxiao.
>>>>>> 1. Process A issue non-blocking lock fail, set OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED.
>>>>> We had set OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY flag before process A call ocfs2_dlm_lock(),
>>>>>> 2. Process B issue non-blocking lock fail, set
>>>>>> OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED again.
>>>>> So process B must wait until ast for Process A returns and clear OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY.
>>>>>
>>>>>> 3. Ast for process A come, clear OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED.
>>>>>> 4. Ast for process B come, set OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So down convert can still be blocked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To fix this issue, I think no need to call ocfs2_dlm_lock() for
>>>>>> non-blocking lock, just check local lockres->l_level is enough, if
>>>>>> request level equal or smaller than it, lock success, or lock fail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Junxiao.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> jiufei.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: joyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>>>>> fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h | 6 ++++++
>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>>>>>>> index 21262f2..1ddb6f1 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>>>>>>> @@ -861,8 +861,13 @@ static inline void ocfs2_generic_handle_convert_action(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lo
>>>>>>> * We set the OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING flag before clearing
>>>>>>> * the OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY flag to prevent the dc thread from
>>>>>>> * downconverting the lock before the upconvert has fully completed.
>>>>>>> + * Do not prevent the dc thread from downconverting if NONBLOCK lock
>>>>>>> + * had already returned.
>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> - lockres_or_flags(lockres, OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING);
>>>>>>> + if (!(lockres->l_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED))
>>>>>>> + lockres_or_flags(lockres, OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING);
>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>> + lockres_clear_flags(lockres, OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> lockres_clear_flags(lockres, OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> @@ -1324,13 +1329,12 @@ static void lockres_add_mask_waiter(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /* returns 0 if the mw that was removed was already satisfied, -EBUSY
>>>>>>> * if the mask still hadn't reached its goal */
>>>>>>> -static int lockres_remove_mask_waiter(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>>>>>> +static int __lockres_remove_mask_waiter(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>>>>>> struct ocfs2_mask_waiter *mw)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> - unsigned long flags;
>>>>>>> int ret = 0;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
>>>>>>> + assert_spin_locked(&lockres->l_lock);
>>>>>>> if (!list_empty(&mw->mw_item)) {
>>>>>>> if ((lockres->l_flags & mw->mw_mask) != mw->mw_goal)
>>>>>>> ret = -EBUSY;
>>>>>>> @@ -1338,6 +1342,18 @@ static int lockres_remove_mask_waiter(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>>>>>> list_del_init(&mw->mw_item);
>>>>>>> init_completion(&mw->mw_complete);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +static int lockres_remove_mask_waiter(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>>>>>> + struct ocfs2_mask_waiter *mw)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>>>>>> + int ret = 0;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
>>>>>>> + ret = __lockres_remove_mask_waiter(lockres, mw);
>>>>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>>> @@ -1373,6 +1389,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_cluster_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>>>>>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>>>>> unsigned int gen;
>>>>>>> int noqueue_attempted = 0;
>>>>>>> + int dlm_locked = 0;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ocfs2_init_mask_waiter(&mw);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @@ -1481,6 +1498,7 @@ again:
>>>>>>> ocfs2_recover_from_dlm_error(lockres, 1);
>>>>>>> goto out;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> + dlm_locked = 1;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mlog(0, "lock %s, successful return from ocfs2_dlm_lock\n",
>>>>>>> lockres->l_name);
>>>>>>> @@ -1514,10 +1532,17 @@ out:
>>>>>>> if (wait && arg_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK &&
>>>>>>> mw.mw_mask & (OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY|OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED)) {
>>>>>>> wait = 0;
>>>>>>> - if (lockres_remove_mask_waiter(lockres, &mw))
>>>>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
>>>>>>> + if (__lockres_remove_mask_waiter(lockres, &mw)) {
>>>>>>> + if (dlm_locked)
>>>>>>> + lockres_or_flags(lockres,
>>>>>>> + OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED);
>>>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
>>>>>>> ret = -EAGAIN;
>>>>>>> - else
>>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
>>>>>>> goto again;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> if (wait) {
>>>>>>> ret = ocfs2_wait_for_mask(&mw);
>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
>>>>>>> index bbec539..7d6b7d0 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
>>>>>>> @@ -144,6 +144,12 @@ enum ocfs2_unlock_action {
>>>>>>> * before the upconvert
>>>>>>> * has completed */
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +#define OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK_FINISHED (0x00001000) /* NONBLOCK cluster
>>>>>>> + * lock has already
>>>>>>> + * returned, do not block
>>>>>>> + * dc thread from
>>>>>>> + * downconverting */
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> struct ocfs2_lock_res_ops;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> typedef void (*ocfs2_lock_callback)(int status, unsigned long data);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-11 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-07 3:41 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: do not set OCFS2_LOCK_UPCONVERT_FINISHING if nonblocking lock can not be granted at once Xue jiufei
2014-11-07 5:54 ` Junxiao Bi
2014-11-07 6:36 ` Xue jiufei
2014-11-07 7:03 ` Junxiao Bi
2014-11-07 9:27 ` Xue jiufei
2014-11-10 1:52 ` Junxiao Bi
2014-11-11 1:41 ` Xue jiufei
2014-11-11 3:59 ` Junxiao Bi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54618994.8060800@oracle.com \
--to=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox