From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gprs: add function to handle activated context
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:53:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294336386.2501.11.camel@aeonflux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimEnzUrSuJtSJuvUp+vNGANi6rsWgvAnHhb_j0J@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1020 bytes --]
Hi Sjur,
> > I thought that we came to the conclusion that CID=0 is pretty much a
> > really bad idea. So I would prefer that your modem is actually not using
> > CID=0 ever.
> Yea, I know you or Denis said so, but I'm not sure we understood your concern...
I really thought it became pretty much clear during the discussion that
introducing a CID=0 that is just special on LTE is a pretty much bad
idea.
As long as CID=0 concept does not exist in GSM/UMTS, you should not make
LTE a special case. It will not fit and just makes things utterly
complex for the telephony stack to figure out when contexts are moved
from LTE to GSM/UMTS.
If CID=0 is not valid for GSM/UTMS then you are in big trouble to make
this work properly. And if it is valid, then there is no difference
between it being CID=0 or any other CID.
So please step away from the CID=0 idea and just give the next free CID
to the network activated context. And per specification the CID start
with 1.
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-06 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-05 17:25 [RFC PATCH] gprs: add function to handle activated context Soum, RedouaneX
2011-01-06 0:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-01-06 0:17 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-01-07 8:52 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont
2011-01-07 15:45 ` Joly, Frederic
2011-01-07 21:07 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-01-06 13:28 ` Soum, RedouaneX
2011-01-07 8:50 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont
2011-01-07 10:38 ` Aki Niemi
2011-01-06 12:02 ` Sjur =?unknown-8bit?q?Br=C3=A6ndeland?=
2011-01-06 14:59 ` Soum, RedouaneX
2011-01-06 16:47 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-01-06 17:14 ` Sjur =?unknown-8bit?q?Br=C3=A6ndeland?=
2011-01-06 16:37 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-01-06 17:39 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-01-06 17:45 ` Sjur =?unknown-8bit?q?Br=C3=A6ndeland?=
2011-01-06 17:53 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2011-01-06 18:10 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-01-07 15:14 ` Joly, Frederic
2011-01-07 15:38 ` Sjur =?unknown-8bit?q?Br=C3=A6ndeland?=
2011-01-07 17:52 ` Joly, Frederic
2011-01-07 21:01 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-01-11 12:46 ` Soum, RedouaneX
2011-01-17 14:21 ` Pekka Pessi
2011-01-17 18:39 ` Sjur =?unknown-8bit?q?Br=C3=A6ndeland?=
2011-01-17 18:51 ` Sjur =?unknown-8bit?q?Br=C3=A6ndeland?=
2011-01-17 22:39 ` Pekka Pessi
2011-01-17 23:15 ` Sjur =?unknown-8bit?q?Br=C3=A6ndeland?=
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1294336386.2501.11.camel@aeonflux \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox