Re: Where is atom-pc.conf hiding?

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 13 jun 2011, om 22:28 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
> 
> > On 06/13/2011 11:31 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> Khem was asking if I could reproduce the recent x86 breakage he was seeing[1] and I ran into another bug:
> >> 
> >> koen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel$ git blame meta-n450/conf/machine/n450.conf  | grep atom
> >> 158f88d7 (Saul Wold   2011-01-03 15:33:52 -0800  6) require conf/machine/atom-pc.conf
> >> 
> > meta-yocto seems to be the place you need to look!
> > 
> > I hope that the layering tools can help to detect and inform folks of this like of dependency.
> 
> Isn't meta-yocto supposed to a the integration layer with no new
> parts? I can't use meta-yocto since it has conflicting beagleboard
> stuff in it, which means that meta-intel is now broken for me as well.
> That surely isn't the intended plan?!?!

The plan on public record is that atom-pc moves to meta-intel as soon as
the layer tooling comes online and meta-yocto becomes its own repo
(which at present its not but its certainly the intent).

Cheers,

Richard