Re: Where is atom-pc.conf hiding?

[Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>]

On 06/13/2011 02:30 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 13 jun 2011, om 22:28 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On 06/13/2011 11:31 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Khem was asking if I could reproduce the recent x86 breakage he was seeing[1] and I ran into another bug:
>>>>
>>>> koen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel$ git blame meta-n450/conf/machine/n450.conf  | grep atom
>>>> 158f88d7 (Saul Wold   2011-01-03 15:33:52 -0800  6) require conf/machine/atom-pc.conf
>>>>
>>> meta-yocto seems to be the place you need to look!
>>>
>>> I hope that the layering tools can help to detect and inform folks of this like of dependency.
>>
>> Isn't meta-yocto supposed to a the integration layer with no new
>> parts? I can't use meta-yocto since it has conflicting beagleboard
>> stuff in it, which means that meta-intel is now broken for me as well.
>> That surely isn't the intended plan?!?!
> 
> The plan on public record is that atom-pc moves to meta-intel as soon as
> the layer tooling comes online and meta-yocto becomes its own repo
> (which at present its not but its certainly the intent).

Until then, and even afterwards can we please get some testing of
non-poky builds done?  I know the autobuilder is full but can't we toss
a few things onto a personal box and try that a few times a week?

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation