Re: Where is atom-pc.conf hiding?

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 15:10 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 06/13/2011 02:30 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> Op 13 jun 2011, om 22:28 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
> >>
> >>> On 06/13/2011 11:31 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Khem was asking if I could reproduce the recent x86 breakage he was seeing[1] and I ran into another bug:
> >>>>
> >>>> koen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel$ git blame meta-n450/conf/machine/n450.conf  | grep atom
> >>>> 158f88d7 (Saul Wold   2011-01-03 15:33:52 -0800  6) require conf/machine/atom-pc.conf
> >>>>
> >>> meta-yocto seems to be the place you need to look!
> >>>
> >>> I hope that the layering tools can help to detect and inform folks of this like of dependency.
> >>
> >> Isn't meta-yocto supposed to a the integration layer with no new
> >> parts? I can't use meta-yocto since it has conflicting beagleboard
> >> stuff in it, which means that meta-intel is now broken for me as well.
> >> That surely isn't the intended plan?!?!
> > 
> > The plan on public record is that atom-pc moves to meta-intel as soon as
> > the layer tooling comes online and meta-yocto becomes its own repo
> > (which at present its not but its certainly the intent).
> 
> Until then, and even afterwards can we please get some testing of
> non-poky builds done?  I know the autobuilder is full but can't we toss
> a few things onto a personal box and try that a few times a week?

Sure, the more people testing the various combinations the better!

Cheers,

Richard