Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: It's broken, please revert. Re: [PATCH 0/4 V4] Share gcc work directories
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:28:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309519701.20015.519.camel@rex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D2DB54E8-BE7A-4036-9F5A-587D90844875@dominion.thruhere.net>

On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:08 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:10 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> 
> > On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 09:15 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> Op 1 jul 2011, om 01:26 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
> > Testing patches is not the sole responsibility of myself and Saul. This
> > gcc patchset was on the mailing list for a considerable time and has
> > been tested in a variety of ways. Various breakage was identified found
> > and those breakages were fixed. The fact there looks to be some
> > incremental build issue with rm_work is unfortunate and likely easy to
> > fix so I think this request is a little out of proportion.
> > 
> > If someone had reported the problem before it merged it would have
> > waited until it was fixed before merging.
> 
> "They will therefore merge and I'm happy with them but it will be a few
> more days before that happens. "
> 
> I was under the impression that I still had a few more days to test
> them now that the eglibc problems have been solved. I don't think you
> can blame people for not testing gcc when eglibc was still blowing up
> in their faces.

I balanced a few different factors in the timing. Merging code like this
on a Friday with 4th July and the US going on holiday next week didn't
seem like a better time to do this so I went for something slightly
earlier. I was working on the assumption we had the eglibc issues
resolved.

> > I find it ironic you're one of the people asking to turn the autobuilder
> > red, make warnings fatal and break things for everyone as 'its the only
> > way to get people to look at and fix them; but on the other hand you're
> > unhappy if testing of patches doesn't happen on every single combination
> > of usages and something does break :/.
> 
> I was actually planning to test them today, now that eglibc works again.

Ok, sorry I wasn't aware of that.

Cheers,

Richard




  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-01 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-28  9:05 [PATCH 0/4 V4] Share gcc work directories Robert Yang
2011-06-28  9:05 ` [PATCH 1/4 V4] bitbake: share source directory Robert Yang
2011-06-28 11:19   ` Richard Purdie
2011-06-28  9:05 ` [PATCH 2/4 V4] Share gcc work directories Robert Yang
2011-06-28  9:05 ` [PATCH 3/4 V4] gcc-4.5.1: share " Robert Yang
2011-06-28  9:05 ` [PATCH 4/4 V4] gcc-4.6: " Robert Yang
2011-06-28 14:53 ` [PATCH 0/4 V4] Share gcc " Richard Purdie
2011-06-30 23:26 ` Saul Wold
2011-07-01  7:15   ` It's broken, please revert. " Koen Kooi
2011-07-01  8:10     ` Richard Purdie
2011-07-01  9:08       ` Koen Kooi
2011-07-01 11:28         ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2011-07-01  8:32     ` Richard Purdie
2011-07-01 11:00       ` Koen Kooi
2011-07-01 13:57         ` Khem Raj
2011-07-01 14:01           ` Koen Kooi
2011-07-01 16:55             ` Khem Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1309519701.20015.519.camel@rex \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox