* [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 @ 2012-07-11 13:02 Bogdan Marinescu 2012-07-17 15:58 ` Saul Wold 2012-07-17 16:54 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Bogdan Marinescu @ 2012-07-11 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-core Tested by building core-image-sato-sdk. Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> --- meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc | 2 +- .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb | 6 ++++++ .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb | 6 ------ 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc index f11e687..0a068be 100644 --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ SDKGCCVERSION ?= "${GCCVERSION}" BINUVERSION ?= "2.22" EGLIBCVERSION ?= "2.15" UCLIBCVERSION ?= "0.9.33" -LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4" +LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4.3" PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc ?= "${GCCVERSION}" PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc-cross ?= "${GCCVERSION}" diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6f8d9e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +require linux-libc-headers.inc + +PR = "r0" + +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "3aefa02db55715d627ed23a01667057d" +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "17f1256daa289dde1a0a587c9753556d37a52770f7c4efcf2666fd4796a6eacc" diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb deleted file mode 100644 index 9e8c88f..0000000 --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb +++ /dev/null @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ -require linux-libc-headers.inc - -PR = "r0" - -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "146af0160fc7a60cf9acf44aec13482b" -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "a797a15d0b6228381507c14ecf4eec4a6cc5c77cfd521ba3b3e1325e85b5b16d" -- 1.7.9.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 2012-07-11 13:02 [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 Bogdan Marinescu @ 2012-07-17 15:58 ` Saul Wold 2012-07-17 16:54 ` Khem Raj 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Saul Wold @ 2012-07-17 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On 07/11/2012 06:02 AM, Bogdan Marinescu wrote: > Tested by building core-image-sato-sdk. > > Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> > --- > meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc | 2 +- > .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb | 6 ++++++ > .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb | 6 ------ > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb > delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb > > diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc > index f11e687..0a068be 100644 > --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc > +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ SDKGCCVERSION ?= "${GCCVERSION}" > BINUVERSION ?= "2.22" > EGLIBCVERSION ?= "2.15" > UCLIBCVERSION ?= "0.9.33" > -LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4" > +LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4.3" > > PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc ?= "${GCCVERSION}" > PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc-cross ?= "${GCCVERSION}" > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..6f8d9e8 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > +require linux-libc-headers.inc > + > +PR = "r0" > + > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "3aefa02db55715d627ed23a01667057d" > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "17f1256daa289dde1a0a587c9753556d37a52770f7c4efcf2666fd4796a6eacc" > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb > deleted file mode 100644 > index 9e8c88f..0000000 > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ > -require linux-libc-headers.inc > - > -PR = "r0" > - > -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "146af0160fc7a60cf9acf44aec13482b" > -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "a797a15d0b6228381507c14ecf4eec4a6cc5c77cfd521ba3b3e1325e85b5b16d" > Merged into OE-Core Thanks Sau! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 2012-07-11 13:02 [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 Bogdan Marinescu 2012-07-17 15:58 ` Saul Wold @ 2012-07-17 16:54 ` Khem Raj 2012-07-18 11:30 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2012-07-17 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2496 bytes --] Why is recipe renamed On Wednesday, July 11, 2012, Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: > Tested by building core-image-sato-sdk. > > Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> > --- > meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc | 2 +- > .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb | 6 ++++++ > .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb | 6 ------ > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/ linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb > delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/ linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb > > diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc > index f11e687..0a068be 100644 > --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc > +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ SDKGCCVERSION ?= "${GCCVERSION}" > BINUVERSION ?= "2.22" > EGLIBCVERSION ?= "2.15" > UCLIBCVERSION ?= "0.9.33" > -LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4" > +LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4.3" > > PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc ?= "${GCCVERSION}" > PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc-cross ?= "${GCCVERSION}" > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/ linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/ linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..6f8d9e8 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > +require linux-libc-headers.inc > + > +PR = "r0" > + > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "3aefa02db55715d627ed23a01667057d" > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "17f1256daa289dde1a0a587c9753556d37a52770f7c4efcf2666fd4796a6eacc" > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/ linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/ linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb > deleted file mode 100644 > index 9e8c88f..0000000 > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ > -require linux-libc-headers.inc > - > -PR = "r0" > - > -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "146af0160fc7a60cf9acf44aec13482b" > -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "a797a15d0b6228381507c14ecf4eec4a6cc5c77cfd521ba3b3e1325e85b5b16d" > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3695 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 2012-07-17 16:54 ` Khem Raj @ 2012-07-18 11:30 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 2012-07-18 13:03 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Marinescu, Bogdan A @ 2012-07-18 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > Why is recipe renamed Wasn't I supposed to do that when I upgraded the package from 3.4 to 3.4.3 ? > > > On Wednesday, July 11, 2012, Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> > wrote: >> Tested by building core-image-sato-sdk. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> >> --- >> meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc | 2 +- >> .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb | 6 ++++++ >> .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb | 6 ------ >> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 >> meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >> delete mode 100644 >> meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >> >> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >> b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >> index f11e687..0a068be 100644 >> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ SDKGCCVERSION ?= "${GCCVERSION}" >> BINUVERSION ?= "2.22" >> EGLIBCVERSION ?= "2.15" >> UCLIBCVERSION ?= "0.9.33" >> -LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4" >> +LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4.3" >> >> PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc ?= "${GCCVERSION}" >> PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc-cross ?= "${GCCVERSION}" >> diff --git >> a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >> b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..6f8d9e8 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ >> +require linux-libc-headers.inc >> + >> +PR = "r0" >> + >> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "3aefa02db55715d627ed23a01667057d" >> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >> "17f1256daa289dde1a0a587c9753556d37a52770f7c4efcf2666fd4796a6eacc" >> diff --git >> a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >> b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >> deleted file mode 100644 >> index 9e8c88f..0000000 >> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >> +++ /dev/null >> @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ >> -require linux-libc-headers.inc >> - >> -PR = "r0" >> - >> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "146af0160fc7a60cf9acf44aec13482b" >> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >> "a797a15d0b6228381507c14ecf4eec4a6cc5c77cfd521ba3b3e1325e85b5b16d" >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 2012-07-18 11:30 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A @ 2012-07-18 13:03 ` Bruce Ashfield 2012-07-18 13:17 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 2012-07-18 13:23 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-07-18 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >> Why is recipe renamed > > Wasn't I supposed to do that when I upgraded the package from 3.4 to 3.4.3 ? No one replied to my other question (or at least no one replied that I noticed), about why we even bothered to bump it to 3.4.3 ... I have the same elements in that question .. but from a different angle. Cheers, Bruce > >> >> >> On Wednesday, July 11, 2012, Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> >> wrote: >>> Tested by building core-image-sato-sdk. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> >>> --- >>> meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc | 2 +- >>> .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb | 6 ++++++ >>> .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb | 6 ------ >>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 >>> meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >>> delete mode 100644 >>> meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >>> >>> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >>> b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >>> index f11e687..0a068be 100644 >>> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >>> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ SDKGCCVERSION ?= "${GCCVERSION}" >>> BINUVERSION ?= "2.22" >>> EGLIBCVERSION ?= "2.15" >>> UCLIBCVERSION ?= "0.9.33" >>> -LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4" >>> +LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4.3" >>> >>> PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc ?= "${GCCVERSION}" >>> PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc-cross ?= "${GCCVERSION}" >>> diff --git >>> a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >>> b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000..6f8d9e8 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ >>> +require linux-libc-headers.inc >>> + >>> +PR = "r0" >>> + >>> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "3aefa02db55715d627ed23a01667057d" >>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>> "17f1256daa289dde1a0a587c9753556d37a52770f7c4efcf2666fd4796a6eacc" >>> diff --git >>> a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >>> b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >>> deleted file mode 100644 >>> index 9e8c88f..0000000 >>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >>> +++ /dev/null >>> @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ >>> -require linux-libc-headers.inc >>> - >>> -PR = "r0" >>> - >>> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "146af0160fc7a60cf9acf44aec13482b" >>> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>> "a797a15d0b6228381507c14ecf4eec4a6cc5c77cfd521ba3b3e1325e85b5b16d" >>> -- >>> 1.7.9.5 >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 2012-07-18 13:03 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-07-18 13:17 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 2012-07-18 13:23 ` Bruce Ashfield 2012-07-18 13:23 ` Richard Purdie 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Marinescu, Bogdan A @ 2012-07-18 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A > <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Why is recipe renamed >> >> Wasn't I supposed to do that when I upgraded the package from 3.4 to 3.4.3 ? > > No one replied to my other question (or at least no one replied that I > noticed), about > why we even bothered to bump it to 3.4.3 ... Quite simply, I'm the owner of the recipe and I'm supposed to upgrade it when a new version appears :) Best, Bogdan > > I have the same elements in that question .. but from a different angle. > > Cheers, > > Bruce > >> >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, July 11, 2012, Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Tested by building core-image-sato-sdk. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> >>>> --- >>>> meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc | 2 +- >>>> .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb | 6 ++++++ >>>> .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb | 6 ------ >>>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 >>>> meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >>>> delete mode 100644 >>>> meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >>>> >>>> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >>>> b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >>>> index f11e687..0a068be 100644 >>>> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >>>> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >>>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ SDKGCCVERSION ?= "${GCCVERSION}" >>>> BINUVERSION ?= "2.22" >>>> EGLIBCVERSION ?= "2.15" >>>> UCLIBCVERSION ?= "0.9.33" >>>> -LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4" >>>> +LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4.3" >>>> >>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc ?= "${GCCVERSION}" >>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc-cross ?= "${GCCVERSION}" >>>> diff --git >>>> a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >>>> b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 0000000..6f8d9e8 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ >>>> +require linux-libc-headers.inc >>>> + >>>> +PR = "r0" >>>> + >>>> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "3aefa02db55715d627ed23a01667057d" >>>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>>> "17f1256daa289dde1a0a587c9753556d37a52770f7c4efcf2666fd4796a6eacc" >>>> diff --git >>>> a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >>>> b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >>>> deleted file mode 100644 >>>> index 9e8c88f..0000000 >>>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >>>> +++ /dev/null >>>> @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ >>>> -require linux-libc-headers.inc >>>> - >>>> -PR = "r0" >>>> - >>>> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "146af0160fc7a60cf9acf44aec13482b" >>>> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>>> "a797a15d0b6228381507c14ecf4eec4a6cc5c77cfd521ba3b3e1325e85b5b16d" >>>> -- >>>> 1.7.9.5 >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > > -- > "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await > thee at its end" > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 2012-07-18 13:17 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A @ 2012-07-18 13:23 ` Bruce Ashfield 2012-07-18 13:50 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-07-18 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Ashfield > <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A >> <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Why is recipe renamed >>> >>> Wasn't I supposed to do that when I upgraded the package from 3.4 to 3.4.3 ? >> >> No one replied to my other question (or at least no one replied that I >> noticed), about >> why we even bothered to bump it to 3.4.3 ... > > Quite simply, I'm the owner of the recipe and I'm supposed to upgrade > it when a new version appears :) I must have missed that .. because I'd disagree with both counts. - libc-headers does not need to be upgraded with every korg stable update - it is coupled to the kernel, and I've done it in the past, and had planned to leave it a 3.4. Cheers, Bruce > > Best, > Bogdan > >> >> I have the same elements in that question .. but from a different angle. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Bruce >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, July 11, 2012, Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Tested by building core-image-sato-sdk. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc | 2 +- >>>>> .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb | 6 ++++++ >>>>> .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb | 6 ------ >>>>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>>>> create mode 100644 >>>>> meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >>>>> delete mode 100644 >>>>> meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >>>>> b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >>>>> index f11e687..0a068be 100644 >>>>> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >>>>> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc >>>>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ SDKGCCVERSION ?= "${GCCVERSION}" >>>>> BINUVERSION ?= "2.22" >>>>> EGLIBCVERSION ?= "2.15" >>>>> UCLIBCVERSION ?= "0.9.33" >>>>> -LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4" >>>>> +LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.4.3" >>>>> >>>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc ?= "${GCCVERSION}" >>>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc-cross ?= "${GCCVERSION}" >>>>> diff --git >>>>> a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >>>>> b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>> index 0000000..6f8d9e8 >>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.3.bb >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ >>>>> +require linux-libc-headers.inc >>>>> + >>>>> +PR = "r0" >>>>> + >>>>> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "3aefa02db55715d627ed23a01667057d" >>>>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>>>> "17f1256daa289dde1a0a587c9753556d37a52770f7c4efcf2666fd4796a6eacc" >>>>> diff --git >>>>> a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >>>>> b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >>>>> deleted file mode 100644 >>>>> index 9e8c88f..0000000 >>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.4.bb >>>>> +++ /dev/null >>>>> @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ >>>>> -require linux-libc-headers.inc >>>>> - >>>>> -PR = "r0" >>>>> - >>>>> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "146af0160fc7a60cf9acf44aec13482b" >>>>> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>>>> "a797a15d0b6228381507c14ecf4eec4a6cc5c77cfd521ba3b3e1325e85b5b16d" >>>>> -- >>>>> 1.7.9.5 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >>>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> >> >> >> -- >> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await >> thee at its end" >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 2012-07-18 13:23 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-07-18 13:50 ` Richard Purdie 2012-07-18 13:52 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2012-07-18 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 09:23 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A > <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Ashfield > > <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A > >> <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Why is recipe renamed > >>> > >>> Wasn't I supposed to do that when I upgraded the package from 3.4 to 3.4.3 ? > >> > >> No one replied to my other question (or at least no one replied that I > >> noticed), about > >> why we even bothered to bump it to 3.4.3 ... > > > > Quite simply, I'm the owner of the recipe and I'm supposed to upgrade > > it when a new version appears :) > > I must have missed that .. because I'd disagree with both counts. > > - libc-headers does not need to be upgraded with every korg stable update > - it is coupled to the kernel, and I've done it in the past, and had planned to > leave it a 3.4. Bogdan: This is probably one of the cases we shouldn't automatically update just based on the output of the version checking scripts. We should only change the point release version here if there is a change to the kernel headers that we need. As for the recipe owner, this one may be best owned by Bruce but I'm open minded on that. Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 2012-07-18 13:50 ` Richard Purdie @ 2012-07-18 13:52 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Marinescu, Bogdan A @ 2012-07-18 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 09:23 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A >> <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Ashfield >> > <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A >> >> <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Why is recipe renamed >> >>> >> >>> Wasn't I supposed to do that when I upgraded the package from 3.4 to 3.4.3 ? >> >> >> >> No one replied to my other question (or at least no one replied that I >> >> noticed), about >> >> why we even bothered to bump it to 3.4.3 ... >> > >> > Quite simply, I'm the owner of the recipe and I'm supposed to upgrade >> > it when a new version appears :) >> >> I must have missed that .. because I'd disagree with both counts. >> >> - libc-headers does not need to be upgraded with every korg stable update >> - it is coupled to the kernel, and I've done it in the past, and had planned to >> leave it a 3.4. > > Bogdan: This is probably one of the cases we shouldn't automatically > update just based on the output of the version checking scripts. We > should only change the point release version here if there is a change > to the kernel headers that we need. Understood, thanks. > > As for the recipe owner, this one may be best owned by Bruce but I'm > open minded on that. I have absolutely nothing against that. Thanks, Bogdan > > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 2012-07-18 13:03 ` Bruce Ashfield 2012-07-18 13:17 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A @ 2012-07-18 13:23 ` Richard Purdie 2012-07-18 13:27 ` Bruce Ashfield 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2012-07-18 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 09:03 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A > <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Why is recipe renamed > > > > Wasn't I supposed to do that when I upgraded the package from 3.4 to 3.4.3 ? > > No one replied to my other question (or at least no one replied that I > noticed), about > why we even bothered to bump it to 3.4.3 ... > > I have the same elements in that question .. but from a different angle. I think Khem's question is a little vague and I'm not sure how I'd answer that. As for policy of updating the kernel headers against stable releases, it can't hurt and we needed to bump PV or PR anyway as Martin mentioned so that was the main reason I took the patch. I think there could be a perception issue if we don't update, on the other hand it could be considered unnecessary churn. So I think in future this will be on a case by case basis. If there was a header fix in the stable series (which is conceivable), we would want to take that for example. Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 2012-07-18 13:23 ` Richard Purdie @ 2012-07-18 13:27 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-07-18 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 09:03 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A >> <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Why is recipe renamed >> > >> > Wasn't I supposed to do that when I upgraded the package from 3.4 to 3.4.3 ? >> >> No one replied to my other question (or at least no one replied that I >> noticed), about >> why we even bothered to bump it to 3.4.3 ... >> >> I have the same elements in that question .. but from a different angle. > > I think Khem's question is a little vague and I'm not sure how I'd > answer that. > > As for policy of updating the kernel headers against stable releases, it > can't hurt and we needed to bump PV or PR anyway as Martin mentioned so > that was the main reason I took the patch. > > I think there could be a perception issue if we don't update, on the > other hand it could be considered unnecessary churn. So I think in > future this will be on a case by case basis. If there was a header fix > in the stable series (which is conceivable), we would want to take that > for example. This works for me, and was my main point. Updating it is one thing, but we should consider before updating, since the "normal" rules don't always apply to this particular package. Thanks for the clarification, Bruce > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-18 14:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-07-11 13:02 [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 Bogdan Marinescu 2012-07-17 15:58 ` Saul Wold 2012-07-17 16:54 ` Khem Raj 2012-07-18 11:30 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 2012-07-18 13:03 ` Bruce Ashfield 2012-07-18 13:17 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 2012-07-18 13:23 ` Bruce Ashfield 2012-07-18 13:50 ` Richard Purdie 2012-07-18 13:52 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 2012-07-18 13:23 ` Richard Purdie 2012-07-18 13:27 ` Bruce Ashfield
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox