Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] EFI: Make installer EFI aware
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:15:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342714551.7940.15.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5005C134.4080805@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 12:47 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> 
> On 07/17/2012 12:40 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> > On 07/17/2012 12:29 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> 
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb
> >> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Small image capable of booting a device. The kernel includes \
> >>   the Minimal RAM-based Initial Root Filesystem (initramfs), which finds the \
> >>   first “init” program more efficiently."
> >>
> >> -IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install busybox udev base-passwd"
> >> +IMAGE_INSTALL = "initramfs-live-boot initramfs-live-install initramfs-live-install-efi busybox udev base-passwd"
> >>
> >>   # Do not pollute the initrd image with rootfs features
> >>   IMAGE_FEATURES = ""
> > 
> > Does this now need a PR bump also?
> 
> I didn't think so as this recipe is rebuilt for every image anyway.
> There is no PR in this recipe.
> 
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb b/meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..6696d94
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> >> +DESCRIPTION = "A live image init script for grub-efi"
> >> +LICENSE = "MIT"
> >> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${COREBASE}/meta/COPYING.MIT;md5=3da9cfbcb788c80a0384361b4de20420"
> >> +SRC_URI = "file://init-install-efi.sh"
> >> +
> >> +PR = "r7"
> >> +
> > Why PR = r7 for a new recipe, there should be no PR as it defaults to r0?
> 
> Good catch, just my forcing rebuilds during development, or perhaps a
> left-over copy from the initramfs-live-install_1.0.bb I based it on.
> Updated as r0 in the branch.

Could I ask you to update this on top of Radu's fix please?

Cheers,

Richard




  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-19 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-17 19:29 [PATCH 0/1 V2] EFI: Make installer EFI aware Darren Hart
2012-07-17 19:29 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Darren Hart
2012-07-17 19:40   ` Saul Wold
2012-07-17 19:47     ` Darren Hart
2012-07-19 16:15       ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-07-19 16:27         ` Darren Hart
2012-07-19 16:54           ` Richard Purdie
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-19 16:45 [PATCH V3 0/1] " Darren Hart
2012-07-19 16:45 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Darren Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1342714551.7940.15.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox