* remaining few uses of "pnum=" for patches
@ 2012-12-13 0:10 Robert P. J. Day
2012-12-13 0:41 ` Martin Jansa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2012-12-13 0:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OE Core mailing list
just noticed that in all of the layers i have checked out (about a
dozen), the usage of the deprecated "pnum=" is down to:
meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.001-100.gz;name=p001-100;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.101-200.gz;name=p101-200;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.201-300.gz;name=p201-300;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.301-400.gz;name=p301-400;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "file://401-446.diff;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
given that that's a single recipe, what about fixing that recipe,
then just dropping support for "pnum=" entirely? i would think people
have had plenty of warning by now.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: remaining few uses of "pnum=" for patches
2012-12-13 0:10 remaining few uses of "pnum=" for patches Robert P. J. Day
@ 2012-12-13 0:41 ` Martin Jansa
2012-12-13 0:52 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Jansa @ 2012-12-13 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: OE Core mailing list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1200 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 07:10:46PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> just noticed that in all of the layers i have checked out (about a
> dozen), the usage of the deprecated "pnum=" is down to:
>
> meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.001-100.gz;name=p001-100;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.101-200.gz;name=p101-200;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.201-300.gz;name=p201-300;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.301-400.gz;name=p301-400;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "file://401-446.diff;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
>
> given that that's a single recipe, what about fixing that recipe,
Good plan, please send patch.
Cheers,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: remaining few uses of "pnum=" for patches
2012-12-13 0:41 ` Martin Jansa
@ 2012-12-13 0:52 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-12-13 1:10 ` Chris Larson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2012-12-13 0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Jansa; +Cc: OE Core mailing list
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 07:10:46PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > just noticed that in all of the layers i have checked out (about a
> > dozen), the usage of the deprecated "pnum=" is down to:
> >
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.001-100.gz;name=p001-100;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.101-200.gz;name=p101-200;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.201-300.gz;name=p201-300;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.301-400.gz;name=p301-400;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "file://401-446.diff;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> >
> > given that that's a single recipe, what about fixing that recipe,
>
> Good plan, please send patch.
while i'm at it, can i just ditch the "apply=yes"? isn't that the
default?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: remaining few uses of "pnum=" for patches
2012-12-13 0:52 ` Robert P. J. Day
@ 2012-12-13 1:10 ` Chris Larson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Larson @ 2012-12-13 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: Martin Jansa, OE Core mailing list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1525 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Martin Jansa wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 07:10:46PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > > just noticed that in all of the layers i have checked out (about a
> > > dozen), the usage of the deprecated "pnum=" is down to:
> > >
> > > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI
> += "
> http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.001-100.gz;name=p001-100;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0
> "
> > > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI
> += "
> http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.101-200.gz;name=p101-200;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0
> "
> > > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI
> += "
> http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.201-300.gz;name=p201-300;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0
> "
> > > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI
> += "
> http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.301-400.gz;name=p301-400;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0
> "
> > > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI
> += "file://401-446.diff;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > >
> > > given that that's a single recipe, what about fixing that recipe,
> >
> > Good plan, please send patch.
>
> while i'm at it, can i just ditch the "apply=yes"? isn't that the
> default?
Nope, it's only the default for .{patch,diff}{,.gz}.
--
Christopher Larson
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2541 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-13 1:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-12-13 0:10 remaining few uses of "pnum=" for patches Robert P. J. Day
2012-12-13 0:41 ` Martin Jansa
2012-12-13 0:52 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-12-13 1:10 ` Chris Larson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox