remaining few uses of "pnum=" for patches

remaining few uses of "pnum=" for patches

[Robert P. J. Day]

  just noticed that in all of the layers i have checked out (about a
dozen), the usage of the deprecated "pnum=" is down to:

meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.001-100.gz;name=p001-100;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.101-200.gz;name=p101-200;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.201-300.gz;name=p201-300;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.301-400.gz;name=p301-400;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "file://401-446.diff;patchdir=..;pnum=0"

  given that that's a single recipe, what about fixing that recipe,
then just dropping support for "pnum=" entirely?  i would think people
have had plenty of warning by now.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

Re: remaining few uses of "pnum=" for patches

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1200 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 07:10:46PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>   just noticed that in all of the layers i have checked out (about a
> dozen), the usage of the deprecated "pnum=" is down to:
> 
> meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.001-100.gz;name=p001-100;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.101-200.gz;name=p101-200;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.201-300.gz;name=p201-300;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.301-400.gz;name=p301-400;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "file://401-446.diff;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> 
>   given that that's a single recipe, what about fixing that recipe,

Good plan, please send patch.

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: remaining few uses of "pnum=" for patches

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Martin Jansa wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 07:10:46PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >   just noticed that in all of the layers i have checked out (about a
> > dozen), the usage of the deprecated "pnum=" is down to:
> >
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.001-100.gz;name=p001-100;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.101-200.gz;name=p101-200;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.201-300.gz;name=p201-300;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.301-400.gz;name=p301-400;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "file://401-446.diff;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> >
> >   given that that's a single recipe, what about fixing that recipe,
>
> Good plan, please send patch.

  while i'm at it, can i just ditch the "apply=yes"?  isn't that the
default?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

Re: remaining few uses of "pnum=" for patches

[Chris Larson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1525 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Martin Jansa wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 07:10:46PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > >   just noticed that in all of the layers i have checked out (about a
> > > dozen), the usage of the deprecated "pnum=" is down to:
> > >
> > > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI
> += "
> http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.001-100.gz;name=p001-100;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0
> "
> > > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI
> += "
> http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.101-200.gz;name=p101-200;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0
> "
> > > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI
> += "
> http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.201-300.gz;name=p201-300;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0
> "
> > > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI
> += "
> http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.301-400.gz;name=p301-400;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0
> "
> > > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI
> += "file://401-446.diff;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > >
> > >   given that that's a single recipe, what about fixing that recipe,
> >
> > Good plan, please send patch.
>
>   while i'm at it, can i just ditch the "apply=yes"?  isn't that the
> default?


Nope, it's only the default for .{patch,diff}{,.gz}.
-- 
Christopher Larson

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2541 bytes --]