[PATCH] bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[PATCH] bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Justin Bronder]

With bitbake commit 'bb: compress: use lz4 instead of lz4c' we require
lz4, not lz4c [1].  Going as far back as Ubuntu 16.04/Fedora 25, they
are packaged together so it should be safe to simply adjust the
requirement from lz4c to lz4.

Note that the two are largely the same, but upstream has considered lz4c
deprecated since at least 2018 [2].

1. https://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=907472034b344e4eb73cfd43059a413469f52e1c
2. https://github.com/lz4/lz4/pull/553

Signed-off-by: Justin Bronder <jsbronder@cold-front.org>
---
 meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
index eda505c861..14e761e2e7 100644
--- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
+++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ HOSTTOOLS += " \
     [ ar as awk basename bash bunzip2 bzip2 cat chgrp chmod chown chrpath cmp comm cp cpio \
     cpp cut date dd diff diffstat dirname du echo egrep env expand expr false \
     fgrep file find flock g++ gawk gcc getconf getopt git grep gunzip gzip \
-    head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4c make md5sum mkdir mkfifo mknod \
+    head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4 make md5sum mkdir mkfifo mknod \
     mktemp mv nm objcopy objdump od patch perl pr printf pwd \
     python3 pzstd ranlib readelf readlink realpath rm rmdir rpcgen sed seq sh \
     sha1sum sha224sum sha256sum sha384sum sha512sum \
-- 
2.46.1

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Richard Purdie]

On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 10:37 -0500, Justin Bronder via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> With bitbake commit 'bb: compress: use lz4 instead of lz4c' we require
> lz4, not lz4c [1].  Going as far back as Ubuntu 16.04/Fedora 25, they
> are packaged together so it should be safe to simply adjust the
> requirement from lz4c to lz4.
> 
> Note that the two are largely the same, but upstream has considered lz4c
> deprecated since at least 2018 [2].
> 
> 1. https://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=907472034b344e4eb73cfd43059a413469f52e1c
> 2. https://github.com/lz4/lz4/pull/553
> 
> Signed-off-by: Justin Bronder <jsbronder@cold-front.org>
> ---
>  meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> index eda505c861..14e761e2e7 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ HOSTTOOLS += " \
>      [ ar as awk basename bash bunzip2 bzip2 cat chgrp chmod chown chrpath cmp comm cp cpio \
>      cpp cut date dd diff diffstat dirname du echo egrep env expand expr false \
>      fgrep file find flock g++ gawk gcc getconf getopt git grep gunzip gzip \
> -    head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4c make md5sum mkdir mkfifo mknod \
> +    head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4 make md5sum mkdir mkfifo mknod \
>      mktemp mv nm objcopy objdump od patch perl pr printf pwd \
>      python3 pzstd ranlib readelf readlink realpath rm rmdir rpcgen sed seq sh \
>      sha1sum sha224sum sha256sum sha384sum sha512sum \
> 

This caused a failure in barebox:

https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/23/builds/409/steps/14/logs/stdio

Cheers,

Richard

Re: bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Justin Bronder]

On 06/11/24 07:50 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 10:37 -0500, Justin Bronder via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > With bitbake commit 'bb: compress: use lz4 instead of lz4c' we require
> > lz4, not lz4c [1].� Going as far back as Ubuntu 16.04/Fedora 25, they
> > are packaged together so it should be safe to simply adjust the
> > requirement from lz4c to lz4.
> > 
> > Note that the two are largely the same, but upstream has considered lz4c
> > deprecated since at least 2018 [2].
> > 
> > 1. https://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=907472034b344e4eb73cfd43059a413469f52e1c
> > 2. https://github.com/lz4/lz4/pull/553
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Justin Bronder <jsbronder@cold-front.org>
> > ---
> > �meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
> > �1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > index eda505c861..14e761e2e7 100644
> > --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ HOSTTOOLS += " \
> > ���� [ ar as awk basename bash bunzip2 bzip2 cat chgrp chmod chown chrpath cmp comm cp cpio \
> > ���� cpp cut date dd diff diffstat dirname du echo egrep env expand expr false \
> > ���� fgrep file find flock g++ gawk gcc getconf getopt git grep gunzip gzip \
> > -��� head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4c make md5sum mkdir mkfifo mknod \
> > +��� head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4 make md5sum mkdir mkfifo mknod \
> > ���� mktemp mv nm objcopy objdump od patch perl pr printf pwd \
> > ���� python3 pzstd ranlib readelf readlink realpath rm rmdir rpcgen sed seq sh \
> > ���� sha1sum sha224sum sha256sum sha384sum sha512sum \
> > 
> 
> This caused a failure in barebox:
> 
> https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/23/builds/409/steps/14/logs/stdio
> 

I see, sorry about that.

What would be the recommended path forward?

- Add lz4c to HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL so it's still symlinked.  This would fix barebox and any other recipes that still depend on lz4c on distributions where lz4c is still packaged but leave others without an early warning system.
- Submit patches to barebox and others to use lz4 instead of lz4c.  This is probably more correct but will leave Tumbleweed unsupported by default with other distros to presumably follow.
- Convince Tumbleweed (and others) to continue packaging lz4c.


-- 
Justin Bronder

Re: bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Richard Purdie]

On Wed, 2024-11-06 at 10:52 -0500, Justin Bronder wrote:
> On 06/11/24 07:50 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 10:37 -0500, Justin Bronder via
> > lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > > With bitbake commit 'bb: compress: use lz4 instead of lz4c' we
> > > require
> > > lz4, not lz4c [1].  Going as far back as Ubuntu 16.04/Fedora 25,
> > > they
> > > are packaged together so it should be safe to simply adjust the
> > > requirement from lz4c to lz4.
> > > 
> > > Note that the two are largely the same, but upstream has
> > > considered lz4c
> > > deprecated since at least 2018 [2].
> > > 
> > > 1.
> > > https://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=907472034b344e4eb73cfd43059a413469f52e1c
> > > 2. https://github.com/lz4/lz4/pull/553
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Justin Bronder <jsbronder@cold-front.org>
> > > ---
> > >  meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > > index eda505c861..14e761e2e7 100644
> > > --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > > +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > > @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ HOSTTOOLS += " \
> > >      [ ar as awk basename bash bunzip2 bzip2 cat chgrp chmod
> > > chown chrpath cmp comm cp cpio \
> > >      cpp cut date dd diff diffstat dirname du echo egrep env
> > > expand expr false \
> > >      fgrep file find flock g++ gawk gcc getconf getopt git grep
> > > gunzip gzip \
> > > -    head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4c make md5sum
> > > mkdir mkfifo mknod \
> > > +    head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4 make md5sum
> > > mkdir mkfifo mknod \
> > >      mktemp mv nm objcopy objdump od patch perl pr printf pwd \
> > >      python3 pzstd ranlib readelf readlink realpath rm rmdir
> > > rpcgen sed seq sh \
> > >      sha1sum sha224sum sha256sum sha384sum sha512sum \
> > > 
> > 
> > This caused a failure in barebox:
> > 
> > https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/23/builds/409/steps/14/logs/stdio
> > 
> 
> I see, sorry about that.
> 
> What would be the recommended path forward?
> 
> - Add lz4c to HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL so it's still symlinked.  This would
> fix barebox and any other recipes that still depend on lz4c on
> distributions where lz4c is still packaged but leave others without
> an early warning system.
> - Submit patches to barebox and others to use lz4 instead of lz4c. 
> This is probably more correct but will leave Tumbleweed unsupported
> by default with other distros to presumably follow.

barebox only recently merged so I think it should be fine to see if we
can switch barebox to use lz4. How would that leave Tumbleweed
supported?

Cheers,

Richard

Re: bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Justin Bronder]

On 06/11/24 16:01 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-11-06 at 10:52 -0500, Justin Bronder wrote:
> > On 06/11/24 07:50 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 10:37 -0500, Justin Bronder via
> > > lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > > > With bitbake commit 'bb: compress: use lz4 instead of lz4c' we
> > > > require
> > > > lz4, not lz4c [1].� Going as far back as Ubuntu 16.04/Fedora 25,
> > > > they
> > > > are packaged together so it should be safe to simply adjust the
> > > > requirement from lz4c to lz4.
> > > > 
> > > > Note that the two are largely the same, but upstream has
> > > > considered lz4c
> > > > deprecated since at least 2018 [2].
> > > > 
> > > > 1.
> > > > https://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=907472034b344e4eb73cfd43059a413469f52e1c
> > > > 2. https://github.com/lz4/lz4/pull/553
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Justin Bronder <jsbronder@cold-front.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > �meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
> > > > �1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > > > index eda505c861..14e761e2e7 100644
> > > > --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > > > +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > > > @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ HOSTTOOLS += " \
> > > > ���� [ ar as awk basename bash bunzip2 bzip2 cat chgrp chmod
> > > > chown chrpath cmp comm cp cpio \
> > > > ���� cpp cut date dd diff diffstat dirname du echo egrep env
> > > > expand expr false \
> > > > ���� fgrep file find flock g++ gawk gcc getconf getopt git grep
> > > > gunzip gzip \
> > > > -��� head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4c make md5sum
> > > > mkdir mkfifo mknod \
> > > > +��� head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4 make md5sum
> > > > mkdir mkfifo mknod \
> > > > ���� mktemp mv nm objcopy objdump od patch perl pr printf pwd \
> > > > ���� python3 pzstd ranlib readelf readlink realpath rm rmdir
> > > > rpcgen sed seq sh \
> > > > ���� sha1sum sha224sum sha256sum sha384sum sha512sum \
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > This caused a failure in barebox:
> > > 
> > > https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/23/builds/409/steps/14/logs/stdio
> > > 
> > 
> > I see, sorry about that.
> > 
> > What would be the recommended path forward?
> > 
> > - Add lz4c to HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL so it's still symlinked.� This would
> > fix barebox and any other recipes that still depend on lz4c on
> > distributions where lz4c is still packaged but leave others without
> > an early warning system.
> > - Submit patches to barebox and others to use lz4 instead of lz4c.�
> > This is probably more correct but will leave Tumbleweed unsupported
> > by default with other distros to presumably follow.
> 
> barebox only recently merged so I think it should be fine to see if we
> can switch barebox to use lz4. How would that leave Tumbleweed
> supported?

Ok, I've submitted a quite simple patch to barebox upstream and I'll resubmit
this along with that patch.  Pending other recipes requiring lz4c, that will
fix things for Tumbleweed.


-- 
Justin Bronder

Re: [OE-core] bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Alexander Kanavin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3263 bytes --]

Can we rather make the affected recipe depend on the native tool rather
than the host one? And pls file a ticket with barebox upstream or maybe the
maintainer can respond right here.

Alex

On Wed 6. Nov 2024 at 16.52, Justin Bronder via lists.openembedded.org
<jsbronder=cold-front.org@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:

> On 06/11/24 07:50 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 10:37 -0500, Justin Bronder via
> lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > > With bitbake commit 'bb: compress: use lz4 instead of lz4c' we require
> > > lz4, not lz4c [1].  Going as far back as Ubuntu 16.04/Fedora 25, they
> > > are packaged together so it should be safe to simply adjust the
> > > requirement from lz4c to lz4.
> > >
> > > Note that the two are largely the same, but upstream has considered
> lz4c
> > > deprecated since at least 2018 [2].
> > >
> > > 1.
> https://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=907472034b344e4eb73cfd43059a413469f52e1c
> > > 2. https://github.com/lz4/lz4/pull/553
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Justin Bronder <jsbronder@cold-front.org>
> > > ---
> > >  meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > > index eda505c861..14e761e2e7 100644
> > > --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > > +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > > @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ HOSTTOOLS += " \
> > >      [ ar as awk basename bash bunzip2 bzip2 cat chgrp chmod chown
> chrpath cmp comm cp cpio \
> > >      cpp cut date dd diff diffstat dirname du echo egrep env expand
> expr false \
> > >      fgrep file find flock g++ gawk gcc getconf getopt git grep gunzip
> gzip \
> > > -    head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4c make md5sum
> mkdir mkfifo mknod \
> > > +    head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4 make md5sum mkdir
> mkfifo mknod \
> > >      mktemp mv nm objcopy objdump od patch perl pr printf pwd \
> > >      python3 pzstd ranlib readelf readlink realpath rm rmdir rpcgen
> sed seq sh \
> > >      sha1sum sha224sum sha256sum sha384sum sha512sum \
> > >
> >
> > This caused a failure in barebox:
> >
> >
> https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/23/builds/409/steps/14/logs/stdio
> >
>
> I see, sorry about that.
>
> What would be the recommended path forward?
>
> - Add lz4c to HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL so it's still symlinked.  This would fix
> barebox and any other recipes that still depend on lz4c on distributions
> where lz4c is still packaged but leave others without an early warning
> system.
> - Submit patches to barebox and others to use lz4 instead of lz4c.  This
> is probably more correct but will leave Tumbleweed unsupported by default
> with other distros to presumably follow.
> - Convince Tumbleweed (and others) to continue packaging lz4c.
>
>
> --
> Justin Bronder
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#206790):
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/206790
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/109427109/1686489
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [
> alex.kanavin@gmail.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5059 bytes --]

Re: [OE-core] bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Enrico Jörns]

Hi Alex,

Am Mittwoch, dem 06.11.2024 um 17:03 +0100 schrieb Alexander Kanavin:
> Can we rather make the affected recipe depend on the native tool rather than the host one?

we could and I agree this would be the more correct way.
The only concern I have is that this would require adding dependencies for all potential compression
methods currently supported by barebox (lz4, lzo, gzip, xz).

Or I have to add some more pseudo-PACKAGECONFIG options and enable only lz4 by default.
However, I fear that this would quickly result in accidentally using the host tools again.
Not sure if there is local way of filtering out allowed host tools?..

> And pls file a ticket with barebox upstream or maybe the maintainer can respond right here.

Thankfully, Justin already contributed the fix to barebox upstream in the meantime and as far as I
can see, it was quickly merged and should thus be part of the November release.

Regards, Enrico

> Alex
> 
> On Wed 6. Nov 2024 at 16.52, Justin Bronder via lists.openembedded.org
> <jsbronder=cold-front.org@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> > On 06/11/24 07:50 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 10:37 -0500, Justin Bronder via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > > > With bitbake commit 'bb: compress: use lz4 instead of lz4c' we require
> > > > lz4, not lz4c [1].  Going as far back as Ubuntu 16.04/Fedora 25, they
> > > > are packaged together so it should be safe to simply adjust the
> > > > requirement from lz4c to lz4.
> > > > 
> > > > Note that the two are largely the same, but upstream has considered lz4c
> > > > deprecated since at least 2018 [2].
> > > > 
> > > > 1. https://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=907472034b344e4eb73cfd43059a413469f52e1c
> > > > 2. https://github.com/lz4/lz4/pull/553
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Justin Bronder <jsbronder@cold-front.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > > > index eda505c861..14e761e2e7 100644
> > > > --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > > > +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> > > > @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ HOSTTOOLS += " \
> > > >      [ ar as awk basename bash bunzip2 bzip2 cat chgrp chmod chown chrpath cmp comm cp cpio
> > > > \
> > > >      cpp cut date dd diff diffstat dirname du echo egrep env expand expr false \
> > > >      fgrep file find flock g++ gawk gcc getconf getopt git grep gunzip gzip \
> > > > -    head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4c make md5sum mkdir mkfifo mknod \
> > > > +    head hostname iconv id install ld ldd ln ls lz4 make md5sum mkdir mkfifo mknod \
> > > >      mktemp mv nm objcopy objdump od patch perl pr printf pwd \
> > > >      python3 pzstd ranlib readelf readlink realpath rm rmdir rpcgen sed seq sh \
> > > >      sha1sum sha224sum sha256sum sha384sum sha512sum \
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > This caused a failure in barebox:
> > > 
> > > https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/23/builds/409/steps/14/logs/stdio
> > > 
> > 
> > I see, sorry about that.
> > 
> > What would be the recommended path forward?
> > 
> > - Add lz4c to HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL so it's still symlinked.  This would fix barebox and any other
> > recipes that still depend on lz4c on distributions where lz4c is still packaged but leave others
> > without an early warning system.
> > - Submit patches to barebox and others to use lz4 instead of lz4c.  This is probably more
> > correct but will leave Tumbleweed unsupported by default with other distros to presumably
> > follow.
> > - Convince Tumbleweed (and others) to continue packaging lz4c.
> > 
> > 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Enrico Jörns                |
Embedded Linux Consulting & Support        | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | Phone: +49-5121-206917-180  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9    |

Re: [OE-core] bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Alexander Kanavin]

On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 14:20, Enrico Jörns <ejo@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Thankfully, Justin already contributed the fix to barebox upstream in the meantime and as far as I
> can see, it was quickly merged and should thus be part of the November release.

I'd say you could resend the above patch with a barebox backport.

Alex

Re: [OE-core] bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Enrico Jörns]

Am Dienstag, dem 12.11.2024 um 14:34 +0100 schrieb Alexander Kanavin:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 14:20, Enrico Jörns <ejo@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > Thankfully, Justin already contributed the fix to barebox upstream in the meantime and as far as
> > I
> > can see, it was quickly merged and should thus be part of the November release.
> 
> I'd say you could resend the above patch with a barebox backport.

To clarify: Justin already did this in a v2 and the patch is in oe-core upstream.

I read this as meaning that you no longer consider a native lz4 dependency necessary.

Thanks and regards, Enrico

> Alex
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Enrico Jörns                |
Embedded Linux Consulting & Support        | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | Phone: +49-5121-206917-180  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9    |

Re: bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Guðni Már Gilbert]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 379 bytes --]

Hi I'm seeing a build error on latest master when building Linux 6.10 due to missing lz4c tool.

I see it's still used even in Linux 6.12: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/Makefile?h=v6.12.1#n511

On my build host, lz4c is symlinked to lz4. But I suspect the issue is lz4c was removed from HOSTTOOLS.

Anyone else seeing this problem?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 584801 bytes --]

Re: bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Justin Bronder]

On 23/11/24 07:28 -0800, Gu�ni M�r Gilbert via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> Hi I'm seeing a build error on latest master when building Linux 6.10 due to missing lz4c tool.
> 
> I see it's still used even in Linux 6.12: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/Makefile?h=v6.12.1#n511
> 
> On my build host, lz4c is symlinked to lz4. But I suspect the issue is lz4c was removed from HOSTTOOLS.
> 
> Anyone else seeing this problem?

Yes, I can reproduce it when setting CONFIG_KERNEL_LZ4.  I've sent a patch upstream.  If they are receptive I'll submit it for linux-yocto.  But perhaps in the meantime we should add lz4c to HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL?

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kbuild/20241125171800.1131761-1-jsbronder@cold-front.org/T/#u

-- 
Justin Bronder

Re: bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Guðni Már Gilbert]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

Hi Justin, thanks for submitting a patch upstream. I can confirm I have this in my defconfig: “CONFIG_KERNEL_LZ4=y”

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 140 bytes --]

Re: [OE-core] bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 01:21:18PM -0500, Justin Bronder wrote:
> On 23/11/24 07:28 -0800, Guðni Már Gilbert via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > Hi I'm seeing a build error on latest master when building Linux 6.10 due to missing lz4c tool.
> > 
> > I see it's still used even in Linux 6.12: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/Makefile?h=v6.12.1#n511
> > 
> > On my build host, lz4c is symlinked to lz4. But I suspect the issue is lz4c was removed from HOSTTOOLS.
> > 
> > Anyone else seeing this problem?
> 
> Yes, I can reproduce it when setting CONFIG_KERNEL_LZ4.  I've sent a patch 
> upstream.  If they are receptive I'll submit it for linux-yocto.

Ok, this got merged to 6.13-rc kernel series, but it's now broken for all the 
downstream BSPs and older kernel versions that use LZ4, besides linux-yocto. 
Sigh...


> But perhaps in the meantime we should add lz4c to HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL?

Was there a patch submitted to have both lz4 and lz4c listed in HOSTTOOLS* 
(at least temporatily until this gets propagated everywhere)?

-- 
Denys

Re: bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of lz4c

[Justin Bronder]

On 09/12/24 22:51 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 01:21:18PM -0500, Justin Bronder wrote:
> > On 23/11/24 07:28 -0800, Gu�ni M�r Gilbert via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > > Hi I'm seeing a build error on latest master when building Linux 6.10 due to missing lz4c tool.
> > > 
> > > I see it's still used even in Linux 6.12: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/Makefile?h=v6.12.1#n511
> > > 
> > > On my build host, lz4c is symlinked to lz4. But I suspect the issue is lz4c was removed from HOSTTOOLS.
> > > 
> > > Anyone else seeing this problem?
> > 
> > Yes, I can reproduce it when setting CONFIG_KERNEL_LZ4.  I've sent a patch 
> > upstream.  If they are receptive I'll submit it for linux-yocto.
> 
> Ok, this got merged to 6.13-rc kernel series, but it's now broken for all the 
> downstream BSPs and older kernel versions that use LZ4, besides linux-yocto. 
> Sigh...
> 
> 
> > But perhaps in the meantime we should add lz4c to HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL?
> 
> Was there a patch submitted to have both lz4 and lz4c listed in HOSTTOOLS* 
> (at least temporatily until this gets propagated everywhere)?

I sent one just now.  Apologies for the annoyances this has caused.  No good
deed goes unpunished ;)

https://lore.kernel.org/openembedded-core/20241210151015.2450083-2-jsbronder@cold-front.org/T/#u

-- 
Justin Bronder