From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>, Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Integrate Smart for RPM image generation
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 13:58:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3221241.HMtLP26WOa@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C0286B.60406@linux.intel.com>
On Wednesday 05 December 2012 21:08:59 Saul Wold wrote:
> On 12/04/2012 11:49 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> > The following patch set relies on the previous "Misc fixes" sent out
> > earlier today.
> >
> > The set replaces the existing rootfs generation with one based on Smart.
> > The work was tested using buildhistory over a wide range of image types:
> > core-image-minimal
> > core-image-base
> > core-image-basic
> > core-image-lsb
> > core-image-sato
> > build-appliance
>
> Did you try with the DISTRO = poky-lsb when doing the lsb build? There
> are failures across the board with the LSB builds
I just did with core-image-lsb, and apart from the pkgconfig issue which I have
worked around, it built fine - I did not see this error. The only thing I can
think of is that it has something to do with these running concurrently,
although I'm not sure how that could be a problem especially as we have
locking for the rpm backend.
I'm now running a concurrent build of all of the four images that failed,
we'll see if I get the same failure or not fairly soon.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-06 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 19:49 [PATCH 0/6] Integrate Smart for RPM image generation Mark Hatle
2012-12-04 19:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] rootfs_rpm.bbclass: Revert to default shell logging behavior Mark Hatle
2012-12-04 19:49 ` [PATCH 2/6] classes/*_rpm: integrate Smart into RPM filesystem construction Mark Hatle
2012-12-06 15:31 ` Richard Purdie
2012-12-06 16:13 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-12-06 17:19 ` Mark Hatle
2012-12-04 19:49 ` [PATCH 3/6] classes/rootfs_rpm: install smart instead of zypper in rpm-based images Mark Hatle
2012-12-04 19:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] package_rpm: Update the way the multilib package names are translated Mark Hatle
2012-12-04 19:49 ` [PATCH 5/6] package_rpm.bbclass: Add additional logging Mark Hatle
2012-12-04 19:49 ` [PATCH 6/6] package_rpm.bbclass: Add support for incremental installs Mark Hatle
2012-12-06 5:08 ` [PATCH 0/6] Integrate Smart for RPM image generation Saul Wold
2012-12-06 13:58 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2012-12-06 17:04 ` Mark Hatle
2012-12-06 17:22 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-12-08 3:29 ` Saul Wold
2012-12-08 6:37 ` Saul Wold
2012-12-08 17:10 ` Mark Hatle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3221241.HMtLP26WOa@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=sgw@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox