From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Integrate Smart for RPM image generation
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:04:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C0D026.8050600@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C0286B.60406@linux.intel.com>
On 12/5/12 11:08 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 12/04/2012 11:49 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> The following patch set relies on the previous "Misc fixes" sent out earlier
>> today.
>>
>> The set replaces the existing rootfs generation with one based on Smart.
>> The work was tested using buildhistory over a wide range of image types:
>> core-image-minimal
>> core-image-base
>> core-image-basic
>> core-image-lsb
>> core-image-sato
>> build-appliance
>>
> Did you try with the DISTRO = poky-lsb when doing the lsb build? There
> are failures across the board with the LSB builds, see this example:
There is no poky-lsb within oe-core, so no I did not.
Do you have a branch with this integrated into Poky, if so I can try to
reproduce it locally.
--Mark
> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8010/builders/nightly-x86-64-lsb/builds/146/steps/shell_29/logs/stdio
>
>
> The failure seems to be on psplash:
> | Error: psplash not found in the base feeds (qemux86_64 x86_64 noarch
> any all).
> | ERROR: Function failed: do_rootfs (see
> /srv/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-slave/nightly-x86-64-lsb/build/build/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/core-image-lsb-dev/1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.10377
> for further information)
> NOTE: recipe core-image-lsb-dev-1.0-r0: task do_rootfs: Failed
>
> Can you look into this before we integrate into master
>
> Thanks
> Sau!
>
>
>
>> Each of which contained minor changes from the former version, but the changes
>> can all be explained by a different package resolver.
>>
>> Multilib configurations of each of the above images were also verified on
>> qemux86_64 configuration with a few lib32 items added to the mix. This was
>> shown, by buildhistory, to result in a more compact install solution.
>>
>> "populate_sdk" was also verified after this patch. Buildhistory does not
>> verify SDKs, so these were verified by hand. The target items all appeared
>> to match the expected image components.
>>
>> The incremental RPM installation code was verified as well.. This code was
>> verified in both multilib and non-multilib configurations.
>>
>> Finally, each of these were verified on: qemux86_64, qemumips, qemuppc, qemuarm,
>> and qemuarm configured w/ hardware float API. This verifies that both the
>> ARM specific "gnueabi" issues and the _ to - in the arch names both work
>> properly.
>>
>> The following changes since commit 0c69e555dda2fa412ba12fa90886b0b92dc60e44:
>>
>> license.bbclass: Avoid grep error message (2012-12-04 11:10:18 -0600)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>> git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib mhatle/smart
>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi//log/?h=mhatle/smart
>>
>> Mark Hatle (4):
>> rootfs_rpm.bbclass: Revert to default shell logging behavior
>> package_rpm: Update the way the multilib package names are translated
>> package_rpm.bbclass: Add additional logging
>> package_rpm.bbclass: Add support for incremental installs
>>
>> Paul Eggleton (2):
>> classes/*_rpm: integrate Smart into RPM filesystem construction
>> classes/rootfs_rpm: install smart instead of zypper in rpm-based
>> images
>>
>> meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 691 +++++++++++++--------------------
>> meta/classes/populate_sdk_rpm.bbclass | 74 ++---
>> meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass | 86 ++---
>> 3 files changed, 338 insertions(+), 513 deletions(-)
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-06 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 19:49 [PATCH 0/6] Integrate Smart for RPM image generation Mark Hatle
2012-12-04 19:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] rootfs_rpm.bbclass: Revert to default shell logging behavior Mark Hatle
2012-12-04 19:49 ` [PATCH 2/6] classes/*_rpm: integrate Smart into RPM filesystem construction Mark Hatle
2012-12-06 15:31 ` Richard Purdie
2012-12-06 16:13 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-12-06 17:19 ` Mark Hatle
2012-12-04 19:49 ` [PATCH 3/6] classes/rootfs_rpm: install smart instead of zypper in rpm-based images Mark Hatle
2012-12-04 19:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] package_rpm: Update the way the multilib package names are translated Mark Hatle
2012-12-04 19:49 ` [PATCH 5/6] package_rpm.bbclass: Add additional logging Mark Hatle
2012-12-04 19:49 ` [PATCH 6/6] package_rpm.bbclass: Add support for incremental installs Mark Hatle
2012-12-06 5:08 ` [PATCH 0/6] Integrate Smart for RPM image generation Saul Wold
2012-12-06 13:58 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-12-06 17:04 ` Mark Hatle [this message]
2012-12-06 17:22 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-12-08 3:29 ` Saul Wold
2012-12-08 6:37 ` Saul Wold
2012-12-08 17:10 ` Mark Hatle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C0D026.8050600@windriver.com \
--to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=sgw@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox