From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Subject: Updating u-boot for oe-core or meta-yocto
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:36:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDBDE9D.5000709@linux.intel.com> (raw)
I've started pulling in the 15 or so patches to u-boot from meta-ti. In
doing so I've come across some questions I'd like you thoughts on.
Specifically, where to put these changes. Some points of context:
1) oe-core is intended to support emulated machines only
2) oe-core has a "virgin" u-boot recipe (no patches)
3) meta-yocto does not have a u-boot recipe (no bbappend either)
4) meta-ti has it's own u-boot recipe with per-machine patches
A stated goal was to bring the Yocto Project's u-boot support for the
Beagleboard in line with that in meta-ti. There are several ways I can
go about this.
a) create a bbappend in meta-yocto and duplicate the meta-ti
modifications in bbappend form.
b) Modify the oe-core recipe directly
While a) is the most direct approach to accomplish our goal, it requires
continual maintenance and duplicates effort. I don't care for this
approach. b) has the potential to consolidate all beagleboard u-boot
recipe work into a single place. It could simplify the meta-ti and
eliminate the need for a bbappend in the meta-yocto layer.
The question of whether bootloaders have a place in oe-core should
probably be addressed. While they aren't needed for the emulated
machines, they are a highly reusable component for real systems, and
that seems justify keeping them in oe-core. Does anyone disagree with
this assessment?
I propose pulling the necessary changes to u-boot from meta-ti into
oe-core. My initial scan suggested the beagleboard patches are mostly
contained to beagle specific source files. I would prefer to pull in all
the patches for all machines into the SRC_URI, rather than divide them
up by machine. This reduces complexity considerably. For the couple of
patches that collide, we would keep those as machine specific.
As a final part of the work, I would include my beagleboard patch status
audit in the included patches and continue to work on reducing the
patches in the recipe for the beagleboard.
Thoughts?
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
next reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 16:36 Darren Hart [this message]
2011-05-24 17:13 ` Updating u-boot for oe-core or meta-yocto Koen Kooi
2011-05-24 18:04 ` Darren Hart
2011-05-24 17:23 ` Khem Raj
2011-05-24 17:51 ` adding meta-intel layers breaks parsing, was " Koen Kooi
2011-05-24 18:07 ` Tom Zanussi
2011-05-25 14:28 ` Tom Zanussi
2011-05-25 14:31 ` Koen Kooi
2011-05-25 14:38 ` Phil Blundell
2011-05-25 14:52 ` Tom Zanussi
2011-05-25 18:56 ` Darren Hart
2011-05-25 19:11 ` Phil Blundell
2011-05-25 20:04 ` Darren Hart
2011-05-25 21:31 ` Richard Purdie
2011-05-25 23:18 ` Darren Hart
2011-05-24 18:23 ` Darren Hart
2011-05-24 18:35 ` Khem Raj
2011-05-24 18:48 ` Phil Blundell
2011-05-24 19:33 ` Darren Hart
2011-05-24 17:33 ` Martin Jansa
2011-05-25 15:51 ` Richard Purdie
2011-05-25 16:36 ` Khem Raj
2011-05-25 16:49 ` Henning Heinold
2011-05-25 18:40 ` Darren Hart
2011-05-26 6:12 ` Anders Darander
2011-05-26 13:54 ` Darren Hart
2011-05-25 21:51 ` Richard Purdie
2011-05-25 23:31 ` Jason Kridner
2011-05-26 18:07 ` Darren Hart
2011-05-27 5:36 ` Anders Darander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDBDE9D.5000709@linux.intel.com \
--to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox