* What is the strategy to update eglibc?
@ 2011-10-31 2:12 Kang Kai
2011-10-31 2:16 ` Kang Kai
2011-11-16 21:38 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kang Kai @ 2011-10-31 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Saul Wold, oe-core
Hi Saul,
I just want to update eglibc but eglibc is using its 2.14 branch and use
svn commit revision "15225" as current version. Of course it is behind
the latest svn revision, but I don't quit sure about which is the right
revision to update eglibc.
Could you give me some guide? Thank you!
Regards,
Kai
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: What is the strategy to update eglibc?
2011-10-31 2:12 What is the strategy to update eglibc? Kang Kai
@ 2011-10-31 2:16 ` Kang Kai
2011-10-31 16:43 ` Saul Wold
2011-11-16 21:38 ` Khem Raj
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kang Kai @ 2011-10-31 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; +Cc: Saul Wold
On 2011年10月31日 10:12, Kang Kai wrote:
> Hi Saul,
>
> I just want to update eglibc but eglibc is using its 2.14 branch and
> use svn commit revision "15225" as current version. Of course it is
> behind the latest svn revision, but I don't quit sure about which is
> the right revision to update eglibc.
Hi Saul,
And right now is 2 commits behind the latest revision, do it worth to
update right now?
Thanks!
>
> Could you give me some guide? Thank you!
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: What is the strategy to update eglibc?
2011-10-31 2:16 ` Kang Kai
@ 2011-10-31 16:43 ` Saul Wold
2011-11-01 2:07 ` Kang Kai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Saul Wold @ 2011-10-31 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; +Cc: Kang Kai
On 10/30/2011 07:16 PM, Kang Kai wrote:
> On 2011年10月31日 10:12, Kang Kai wrote:
>> Hi Saul,
>>
>> I just want to update eglibc but eglibc is using its 2.14 branch and
>> use svn commit revision "15225" as current version. Of course it is
>> behind the latest svn revision, but I don't quit sure about which is
>> the right revision to update eglibc.
> Hi Saul,
>
> And right now is 2 commits behind the latest revision, do it worth to
> update right now?
Kai,
I know that Khem recently added the eglibc 2.14 recipe, but I think that
we are still actually using the 2.13 recipe as defined by EGLIBCVERSION.
At this point, it might be good to know what's changed by those 2
commits and maybe do a full build and system test with EGLIBCVERSION set
to 2.14 to find out if the problems are resolved. You might look back
in the email list to mid-June to see what the original set of issues was.
Sau!
> Thanks!
>
>>
>> Could you give me some guide? Thank you!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kai
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: What is the strategy to update eglibc?
2011-10-31 16:43 ` Saul Wold
@ 2011-11-01 2:07 ` Kang Kai
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kang Kai @ 2011-11-01 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Saul Wold; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On 2011年11月01日 00:43, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 10/30/2011 07:16 PM, Kang Kai wrote:
>> On 2011年10月31日 10:12, Kang Kai wrote:
>>> Hi Saul,
>>>
>>> I just want to update eglibc but eglibc is using its 2.14 branch and
>>> use svn commit revision "15225" as current version. Of course it is
>>> behind the latest svn revision, but I don't quit sure about which is
>>> the right revision to update eglibc.
>> Hi Saul,
>>
>> And right now is 2 commits behind the latest revision, do it worth to
>> update right now?
>
> Kai,
>
> I know that Khem recently added the eglibc 2.14 recipe, but I think
> that we are still actually using the 2.13 recipe as defined by
> EGLIBCVERSION.
>
> At this point, it might be good to know what's changed by those 2
> commits and maybe do a full build and system test with EGLIBCVERSION
> set to 2.14 to find out if the problems are resolved. You might look
> back in the email list to mid-June to see what the original set of
> issues was.
Thanks, Saul! I'll try that.
>
> Sau!
>
>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>>
>>> Could you give me some guide? Thank you!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Kai
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: What is the strategy to update eglibc?
2011-10-31 2:12 What is the strategy to update eglibc? Kang Kai
2011-10-31 2:16 ` Kang Kai
@ 2011-11-16 21:38 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-17 2:32 ` Kang Kai
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2011-11-16 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; +Cc: Saul Wold
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Kang Kai <Kai.Kang@windriver.com> wrote:
> Hi Saul,
>
> I just want to update eglibc but eglibc is using its 2.14 branch and use svn
> commit revision "15225" as current version. Of course it is behind the
> latest svn revision, but I don't quit sure about which is the right revision
> to update eglibc.
since release branches of eglibc only get bug fixes in ideal case it
should be good at any revision. However if we have bug
fixes that dont affect us immediately we do not tend to update
the revision. If you find that some bug fix thats applied upstream is
needed it certainly can be a reason to bump up srcrev given we do some
level of build and runtime testing
with new revision.
>
> Could you give me some guide? Thank you!
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: What is the strategy to update eglibc?
2011-11-16 21:38 ` Khem Raj
@ 2011-11-17 2:32 ` Kang Kai
2011-11-17 2:35 ` Ni Qingliang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kang Kai @ 2011-11-17 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; +Cc: Saul Wold
On 2011年11月17日 05:38, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Kang Kai<Kai.Kang@windriver.com> wrote:
>> Hi Saul,
>>
>> I just want to update eglibc but eglibc is using its 2.14 branch and use svn
>> commit revision "15225" as current version. Of course it is behind the
>> latest svn revision, but I don't quit sure about which is the right revision
>> to update eglibc.
Hi Khem,
> since release branches of eglibc only get bug fixes in ideal case it
> should be good at any revision. However if we have bug
> fixes that dont affect us immediately we do not tend to update
> the revision. If you find that some bug fix thats applied upstream is
> needed it certainly can be a reason to bump up srcrev given we do some
> level of build and runtime testing
> with new revision.
Thanks very much for your detailed explanation.
I check the changelog of eglibc 2.13 branch(latest is 15508), and they
are some tiny updates except the revision 15226 that is same with
current patch
glibc_bug_fix_12454.patch
And I made the rough tests of image-sato of qemu-x86 and qemu-arm and
results are fine.
Regards,
Kai
>
>> Could you give me some guide? Thank you!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kai
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: What is the strategy to update eglibc?
2011-11-17 2:32 ` Kang Kai
@ 2011-11-17 2:35 ` Ni Qingliang
2011-11-17 6:41 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-17 8:09 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ni Qingliang @ 2011-11-17 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; +Cc: Saul Wold
it looks like there is 2.14 bb file already, why the default eglibc stay
on 2.13?
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 10:32 +0800, Kang Kai wrote:
> On 2011年11月17日 05:38, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Kang Kai<Kai.Kang@windriver.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Saul,
> >>
> >> I just want to update eglibc but eglibc is using its 2.14 branch and use svn
> >> commit revision "15225" as current version. Of course it is behind the
> >> latest svn revision, but I don't quit sure about which is the right revision
> >> to update eglibc.
>
> Hi Khem,
> > since release branches of eglibc only get bug fixes in ideal case it
> > should be good at any revision. However if we have bug
> > fixes that dont affect us immediately we do not tend to update
> > the revision. If you find that some bug fix thats applied upstream is
> > needed it certainly can be a reason to bump up srcrev given we do some
> > level of build and runtime testing
> > with new revision.
>
> Thanks very much for your detailed explanation.
> I check the changelog of eglibc 2.13 branch(latest is 15508), and they
> are some tiny updates except the revision 15226 that is same with
> current patch
>
> glibc_bug_fix_12454.patch
>
> And I made the rough tests of image-sato of qemu-x86 and qemu-arm and
> results are fine.
>
> Regards,
> Kai
> >
> >> Could you give me some guide? Thank you!
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Kai
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
Yi Qingliang
niqingliang@insigma.com.cn
https://niqingliang2003.wordpress.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: What is the strategy to update eglibc?
2011-11-17 2:35 ` Ni Qingliang
@ 2011-11-17 6:41 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-17 6:56 ` Ni Qingliang
2011-11-17 8:09 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2011-11-17 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: niqingliang, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; +Cc: Saul Wold
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Ni Qingliang
<niqingliang@insigma.com.cn> wrote:
> it looks like there is 2.14 bb file already, why the default eglibc stay
> on 2.13?
2.14 removed some functionality rpc which is used extensively
alternative to use libtirpc is not sufficient atm. Therefore we
readded the functionality into 2.14 recipes and they need testing.
Some distros e.g. angstrom-bleeding use 2.14 but its not default in
oe-core yet for same reasons that it needs to be
tested
>
> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 10:32 +0800, Kang Kai wrote:
>> On 2011年11月17日 05:38, Khem Raj wrote:
>> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Kang Kai<Kai.Kang@windriver.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi Saul,
>> >>
>> >> I just want to update eglibc but eglibc is using its 2.14 branch and use svn
>> >> commit revision "15225" as current version. Of course it is behind the
>> >> latest svn revision, but I don't quit sure about which is the right revision
>> >> to update eglibc.
>>
>> Hi Khem,
>> > since release branches of eglibc only get bug fixes in ideal case it
>> > should be good at any revision. However if we have bug
>> > fixes that dont affect us immediately we do not tend to update
>> > the revision. If you find that some bug fix thats applied upstream is
>> > needed it certainly can be a reason to bump up srcrev given we do some
>> > level of build and runtime testing
>> > with new revision.
>>
>> Thanks very much for your detailed explanation.
>> I check the changelog of eglibc 2.13 branch(latest is 15508), and they
>> are some tiny updates except the revision 15226 that is same with
>> current patch
>>
>> glibc_bug_fix_12454.patch
>>
>> And I made the rough tests of image-sato of qemu-x86 and qemu-arm and
>> results are fine.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kai
>> >
>> >> Could you give me some guide? Thank you!
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Kai
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Openembedded-core mailing list
>> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
> --
> Yi Qingliang
> niqingliang@insigma.com.cn
> https://niqingliang2003.wordpress.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: What is the strategy to update eglibc?
2011-11-17 6:41 ` Khem Raj
@ 2011-11-17 6:56 ` Ni Qingliang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ni Qingliang @ 2011-11-17 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: Saul Wold, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Thanks for the explanation:)
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:41 +0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Ni Qingliang
> <niqingliang@insigma.com.cn> wrote:
> > it looks like there is 2.14 bb file already, why the default eglibc stay
> > on 2.13?
>
> 2.14 removed some functionality rpc which is used extensively
> alternative to use libtirpc is not sufficient atm. Therefore we
> readded the functionality into 2.14 recipes and they need testing.
> Some distros e.g. angstrom-bleeding use 2.14 but its not default in
> oe-core yet for same reasons that it needs to be
> tested
>
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 10:32 +0800, Kang Kai wrote:
> >> On 2011年11月17日 05:38, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Kang Kai<Kai.Kang@windriver.com> wrote:
> >> >> Hi Saul,
> >> >>
> >> >> I just want to update eglibc but eglibc is using its 2.14 branch and use svn
> >> >> commit revision "15225" as current version. Of course it is behind the
> >> >> latest svn revision, but I don't quit sure about which is the right revision
> >> >> to update eglibc.
> >>
> >> Hi Khem,
> >> > since release branches of eglibc only get bug fixes in ideal case it
> >> > should be good at any revision. However if we have bug
> >> > fixes that dont affect us immediately we do not tend to update
> >> > the revision. If you find that some bug fix thats applied upstream is
> >> > needed it certainly can be a reason to bump up srcrev given we do some
> >> > level of build and runtime testing
> >> > with new revision.
> >>
> >> Thanks very much for your detailed explanation.
> >> I check the changelog of eglibc 2.13 branch(latest is 15508), and they
> >> are some tiny updates except the revision 15226 that is same with
> >> current patch
> >>
> >> glibc_bug_fix_12454.patch
> >>
> >> And I made the rough tests of image-sato of qemu-x86 and qemu-arm and
> >> results are fine.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Kai
> >> >
> >> >> Could you give me some guide? Thank you!
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards,
> >> >> Kai
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
> >> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> >> >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> >> >>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> >> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> >> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> >
> > --
> > Yi Qingliang
> > niqingliang@insigma.com.cn
> > https://niqingliang2003.wordpress.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> >
--
Yi Qingliang
niqingliang@insigma.com.cn
https://niqingliang2003.wordpress.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: What is the strategy to update eglibc?
2011-11-17 2:35 ` Ni Qingliang
2011-11-17 6:41 ` Khem Raj
@ 2011-11-17 8:09 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: McClintock Matthew-B29882 @ 2011-11-17 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: niqingliang@insigma.com.cn,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Saul Wold
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Ni Qingliang
<niqingliang@insigma.com.cn> wrote:
> it looks like there is 2.14 bb file already, why the default eglibc stay
> on 2.13?
../meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc:PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc
?= "${EGLIBCVERSION}"
../meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc:EGLIBCVERSION ?= "2.13"
Someone needs to bump the default version.
-M
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-17 8:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-31 2:12 What is the strategy to update eglibc? Kang Kai
2011-10-31 2:16 ` Kang Kai
2011-10-31 16:43 ` Saul Wold
2011-11-01 2:07 ` Kang Kai
2011-11-16 21:38 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-17 2:32 ` Kang Kai
2011-11-17 2:35 ` Ni Qingliang
2011-11-17 6:41 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-17 6:56 ` Ni Qingliang
2011-11-17 8:09 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox