UDEV-145??

UDEV-145??

[Saul Wold]

Does anyone know why we might be keeping this older version around?  I 
know that in the past there were kernel <-> udev issues. Are most usages 
now using current kernels and udev?

Please let me know, I will remove it unless I hear otherwise.

Thanks
-- 
     Sau!

Saul Wold
Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel
Yocto Project / Poky Build System

Re: UDEV-145??

[Joshua Lock]

On 16/12/11 14:21, Saul Wold wrote:
> 
> Does anyone know why we might be keeping this older version around?  I
> know that in the past there were kernel <-> udev issues. Are most usages
> now using current kernels and udev?

I was wondering the same thing. I have a WIP patch series to drop the
old version and the old inc file.

Further I'd like to try and get meta-oe using at least most of the
oe-core udev, I've not looked at the differences there yet.

Joshua
-- 
Joshua Lock
        Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
        Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: UDEV-145??

[Otavio Salvador]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1052 bytes --]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 16:20, Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On 16/12/11 14:21, Saul Wold wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know why we might be keeping this older version around?  I
> > know that in the past there were kernel <-> udev issues. Are most usages
> > now using current kernels and udev?
>
> I was wondering the same thing. I have a WIP patch series to drop the
> old version and the old inc file.
>
> Further I'd like to try and get meta-oe using at least most of the
> oe-core udev, I've not looked at the differences there yet.
>

I read this e-mail after I started working on this. My current WIP patchset
is at:

https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/compare/ae4118a1f78f113c3d687c3aa6a86007cf977cae...master

I am going to finish this getting 175 on oe-core but those patches seems
good for merging to me.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1724 bytes --]

Re: UDEV-145??

[Koen Kooi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1163 bytes --]


Op 20 dec. 2011, om 14:35 heeft Otavio Salvador het volgende geschreven:

> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 16:20, Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 16/12/11 14:21, Saul Wold wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know why we might be keeping this older version around?  I
> > know that in the past there were kernel <-> udev issues. Are most usages
> > now using current kernels and udev?
> 
> I was wondering the same thing. I have a WIP patch series to drop the
> old version and the old inc file.
> 
> Further I'd like to try and get meta-oe using at least most of the
> oe-core udev, I've not looked at the differences there yet.
> 
> I read this e-mail after I started working on this. My current WIP patchset is at:
> 
> https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/compare/ae4118a1f78f113c3d687c3aa6a86007cf977cae...master
> 
> I am going to finish this getting 175 on oe-core but those patches seems good for merging to me.

Keep in mind that udev 175 looks a lot different than earlier versions, e.g. no udev-acl anymore, locations have moved, etc. So the custom OE initscripts will need a fair amount of changes for people still using sysvinit.

[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 169 bytes --]

Re: UDEV-145??

[Otavio Salvador]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 951 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:48, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>
> Op 20 dec. 2011, om 14:35 heeft Otavio Salvador het volgende geschreven:
> ...
>
> I read this e-mail after I started working on this. My current WIP
> patchset is at:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/compare/ae4118a1f78f113c3d687c3aa6a86007cf977cae...master
> >
> > I am going to finish this getting 175 on oe-core but those patches seems
> good for merging to me.
>
> Keep in mind that udev 175 looks a lot different than earlier versions,
> e.g. no udev-acl anymore, locations have moved, etc. So the custom OE
> initscripts will need a fair amount of changes for people still using
> sysvinit.
>

I will on 173 first, in this case.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1696 bytes --]