From: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] glib-2.0: Don't check function "qsort_r" in configure.ac
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:16:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2F9A58.3030300@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F2F8344.5000509@windriver.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2975 bytes --]
On 2012年02月06日 15:37, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
> On 2012年02月06日 15:05, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:41:09PM +0800, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
>>> From: Xiaofeng Yan<xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
>>>
>>> The function "g_qsort_with_data" has two kinds of realization. One
>>> calls qsort_r
>>> from libglib, the other realize itself. the realization method is
>>> controlled by macro "HAVE_QSORT_R".
>>> qsort_r from libglib cause sort error. Add no-check-qsort_r.patch
>>> for fixing this problem.
>>> This patch is to fix bug 1959. After this patch is merged into
>>> OE-core I will open a new bug to
>>> track the reason why qsort_r report normally. For finishing lsb test
>>> in YOCTO 1.2 M3 this patch
>>> is applied temporarily.
>>>
>>> Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
>>> Branch: xiaofeng/1959
>>> Browse:
>>> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=xiaofeng/1959
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Xiaofeng Yan<xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
>>> ---
>> no-check-qsort_r.patch is the same as remove.test.for.qsort_r.patch from
>> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=74f43e3b269c01dba7cd5215a8e825229bd5ecff
>>
>>
>> which was later removed from glib-2.0-native in
>> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=37579d7d74d127c90c1e078d05c5bf4ba0b3f755
>>
>>
>> and later removed completely in
>> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=812342e44e9e361a0fa93cfcfe65cf4dd6f2fb57
>>
>>
>> Are you sure this patch is right fix? And no need to split adding patch
>> itself and adding it to SRC_URI to 2 patches.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
> Hi Martin Jansa,
> I reviewed the above link, no-check-qsort_r.patch is the same as
> remove.test.for.qsort_r.patch really. Please check attachment for the
> test program from LSB 4.1. I think we need this patch because it is an
> error really. LSB report the next information:
>
> After sorting array, the 0-th element of array should be 1, but is 2
> After sorting array, the 1-th element of array should be 2, but is 1
> After sorting array, the 2-th element of array should be 3, but is 5
> After sorting array, the 4-th element of array should be 5, but is 3
>
>
> I can reuse this patch which was removed before if you think this is a
> bug. Do you any suggestion?
>
> Compile this test program.
> $ gcc -g `pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0` gobject_value_arrays.c -o
> gobject -lgobject-2.0
>
>
I reviewed the origin patch from Martin Jansa and found that my patch is
different from him. My patch is to remove the check of qsort_r and the
origin had still this check. I also update my patch because
it have two file:// in SRC_URI.
Thank Martin Jansa.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5422 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-06 6:41 [PATCH 0/2] glib-2.0: Don't check function "qsort_r" in configure.ac Xiaofeng Yan
2012-02-06 6:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] glib-2.0: Don't check function qsort_r Xiaofeng Yan
2012-02-06 9:13 ` Phil Blundell
2012-02-06 15:34 ` Khem Raj
2012-02-06 19:13 ` Peter Tworek
2012-02-06 22:54 ` Khem Raj
2012-02-06 6:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] glib-2.0: Add patch "no-check-qsort_r.patch" Xiaofeng Yan
2012-02-06 15:33 ` Khem Raj
2012-02-07 5:40 ` Xiaofeng Yan
2012-02-06 7:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] glib-2.0: Don't check function "qsort_r" in configure.ac Martin Jansa
2012-02-06 7:37 ` Xiaofeng Yan
2012-02-06 9:16 ` Xiaofeng Yan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F2F9A58.3030300@windriver.com \
--to=xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox