Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
Cc: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>,
	Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt-tests: fix dependency on eglibc, clean LDFLAGS passing
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:33:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F68A33A.7060604@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120320152846.GA22965@denix.org>



On 03/20/2012 08:28 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 08:01:44AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/19/2012 05:22 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>>> From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>
>>>
>>> Replace dependency on eglibc with virtual/libc
>>> Pass LDFLAGS to TARGET_CC_ARCH, instead of CFLAGS as Makefile overrides it
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>
>>
>> Thanks Denys,
>>
>> Looking through the rt-tests sources I don't see TARGET_CC_ARCH
>> anywhere. Have you confirmed that changes made there make their way into
>> the actual build?
> 
> Darren,
> 
> TARGET_CC_ARCH is not an rt-tests specific variable, it's used in OE. 
> Although, TARGET_LDFLAGS might be more appropriate for this purpose, 
> historically TARGET_CC_ARCH was heavily used to pass distro LDFLAGS to the 
> app's build process - grepping it would show many such cases in OE-Core and 
> especially in meta-oe...


OK, thanks for the context. Will you be resubmitting with TARGET_LDFLAGS?


>> What was the problem you ran into?
> 
> Not a problem per se, but it was not getting all the LDFLAGS being passed, 
> more specifically:
> 
> -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed
> 
> BTW, in Classic OE it was failing on GNU Hash QA check w/o this.
> 

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel



  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-20 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-20  0:22 [PATCH] rt-tests: fix dependency on eglibc, clean LDFLAGS passing Denys Dmytriyenko
2012-03-20 15:01 ` Darren Hart
2012-03-20 15:11   ` Koen Kooi
2012-04-07  3:34     ` Khem Raj
2012-03-20 15:28   ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2012-03-20 15:33     ` Darren Hart [this message]
2012-03-20 16:09       ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2012-03-20 16:22         ` Darren Hart
2012-03-20 18:39         ` Darren Hart
2012-03-20 18:59           ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2012-03-20 19:03             ` Darren Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F68A33A.7060604@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=denis@denix.org \
    --cc=denys@ti.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox