Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt-tests: fix dependency on eglibc, clean LDFLAGS passing
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:39:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F68CEDA.2060101@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120320160928.GB22965@denix.org>

On 03/20/2012 09:09 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 08:33:14AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/20/2012 08:28 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 08:01:44AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 03/19/2012 05:22 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>>>>> From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Replace dependency on eglibc with virtual/libc
>>>>> Pass LDFLAGS to TARGET_CC_ARCH, instead of CFLAGS as Makefile overrides it
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Denys,
>>>>
>>>> Looking through the rt-tests sources I don't see TARGET_CC_ARCH
>>>> anywhere. Have you confirmed that changes made there make their way into
>>>> the actual build?
>>>
>>> Darren,
>>>
>>> TARGET_CC_ARCH is not an rt-tests specific variable, it's used in OE. 
>>> Although, TARGET_LDFLAGS might be more appropriate for this purpose, 
>>> historically TARGET_CC_ARCH was heavily used to pass distro LDFLAGS to the 
>>> app's build process - grepping it would show many such cases in OE-Core and 
>>> especially in meta-oe...
>>
>> OK, thanks for the context. Will you be resubmitting with TARGET_LDFLAGS?
> 
> Nope, my bad, it's actually the other way around. From bitbake.conf:
> 
> export LDFLAGS = "${TARGET_LDFLAGS}"
> 
> So, appending to TARGET_CC_ARCH is the simplest way to pass flags, as that's 
> embedded into $CC
> 
> Another option would have been to call make with -e flag to let environment 
> variables override the ones in the Makefile, but that's less controlled...
> 

How about the follow patch against rt-tests? Clark W. said he's fine taking a
patch that allows such an override. Does this meet your needs?


From 9f1944b0751ccb398a47fc4c3652c459aab44f38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <9f1944b0751ccb398a47fc4c3652c459aab44f38.1332268655.git.darren@dvhart.com>
From: Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:34:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] rt-tests: Support user supplied CFLAGS and LDFLAGS

Accept user supplied CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, overwriting the
Makefile supplied versions. This can cause the build to
fail if the user does not provide at least what the Makefile
defines, but so be it.

Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com>
CC: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
---
 Makefile |   25 +++++++++++++------------
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 4038dcc..e1edf6c 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ ifneq ($(filter x86_64 i386 ia64 mips powerpc,$(machinetype)),)
 NUMA 	:= 1
 endif
 
-CFLAGS = -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -Wno-nonnull -Isrc/include
+CFLAGS ?= -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -Wno-nonnull -Isrc/include
+LDFLAGS ?=
 
 PYLIB  := $(shell python -c 'import distutils.sysconfig;  print distutils.sysconfig.get_python_lib()')
 
@@ -61,41 +62,41 @@ all: $(TARGETS) hwlatdetect
 -include $(sources:.c=.d)
 
 cyclictest: cyclictest.o rt-utils.o
-	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS) $(NUMA_LIBS)
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS) $(NUMA_LIBS)
 
 signaltest: signaltest.o rt-utils.o
-	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS)
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS)
 
 pi_stress: pi_stress.o
-	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS)
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS)
 
 hwlatdetect:  src/hwlatdetect/hwlatdetect.py
 	chmod +x src/hwlatdetect/hwlatdetect.py
 	ln -s src/hwlatdetect/hwlatdetect.py hwlatdetect
 
 rt-migrate-test: rt-migrate-test.o
-	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS)
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS)
 
 ptsematest: ptsematest.o rt-utils.o rt-get_cpu.o
-	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS) $(EXTRA_LIBS)
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS) $(EXTRA_LIBS)
 
 sigwaittest: sigwaittest.o rt-utils.o rt-get_cpu.o
-	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS) $(EXTRA_LIBS)
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS) $(EXTRA_LIBS)
 
 svsematest: svsematest.o rt-utils.o rt-get_cpu.o
-	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS) $(EXTRA_LIBS)
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS) $(EXTRA_LIBS)
 
 pmqtest: pmqtest.o rt-utils.o rt-get_cpu.o
-	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS) $(EXTRA_LIBS)
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS) $(EXTRA_LIBS)
 
 sendme: sendme.o rt-utils.o rt-get_cpu.o
-	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS) $(EXTRA_LIBS)
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS) $(EXTRA_LIBS)
 
 pip_stress: pip_stress.o error.o rt-utils.o
-	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS)
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS)
 
 hackbench: hackbench.o
-	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS)
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS)
 
 CLEANUP  = $(TARGETS) *.o .depend *.*~ *.orig *.rej rt-tests.spec *.d
 CLEANUP += $(if $(wildcard .git), ChangeLog)
-- 
1.7.6.5


-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel



  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-20 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-20  0:22 [PATCH] rt-tests: fix dependency on eglibc, clean LDFLAGS passing Denys Dmytriyenko
2012-03-20 15:01 ` Darren Hart
2012-03-20 15:11   ` Koen Kooi
2012-04-07  3:34     ` Khem Raj
2012-03-20 15:28   ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2012-03-20 15:33     ` Darren Hart
2012-03-20 16:09       ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2012-03-20 16:22         ` Darren Hart
2012-03-20 18:39         ` Darren Hart [this message]
2012-03-20 18:59           ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2012-03-20 19:03             ` Darren Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F68CEDA.2060101@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=denys@ti.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox