From: Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] coreutils: Upgrade to upstream version 8.17
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:04:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5031D36D.7040107@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502E696C.8050304@linux.intel.com>
On 08/17/2012 06:55 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 06:05 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>
>> ---
>> .../coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch | 13
>> +++++++++++++
>> .../remove-gets.patch | 20
>> +++++++++++---------
>> .../remove-usr-local-lib-from-m4.patch | 0
>> .../{coreutils_8.14.bb => coreutils_8.17.bb} | 9 +++++----
>> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644
>> meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
>> rename meta/recipes-core/coreutils/{coreutils-8.14 =>
>> coreutils-8.17}/remove-gets.patch (47%)
>> rename meta/recipes-core/coreutils/{coreutils-8.14 =>
>> coreutils-8.17}/remove-usr-local-lib-from-m4.patch (100%)
>> rename meta/recipes-core/coreutils/{coreutils_8.14.bb =>
>> coreutils_8.17.bb} (91%)
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
>> b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..6bbe7ee
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++
>> b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
>
> Your new patch needs a header, explaining why, and adding
> Upstream-Status and Signed-off-by tags.
>
I meant this only as an RFC, to get feedback for my patch, from a
functional point of view, it is not intended to be the final patch.
I have a Signed-off-by tag, are you referring to something else?
Can you give me more details about Upstream-Status? I've google'd this
problem for a bit but could not find an existing patch for it, nor a bug
filled for this matter. Since I don't know yet if what I'm fixing it's
really a bug (or a misconfiguration on my side) I send this RFC to get a
hold of whether I'm on the good track here or not. If this patch turns
out to be valid, I'll get in touch with the guys from coreutils' mailing
lists, and try to push it upstream.
radu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-20 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-17 13:05 [PATCH][RFC] coreutils: Upgrade to upstream version 8.17 Radu Moisan
2012-08-17 13:06 ` Radu Moisan
2012-08-17 15:55 ` Saul Wold
2012-08-20 6:04 ` Radu Moisan [this message]
2012-08-20 16:45 ` Saul Wold
2012-08-21 8:46 ` Radu Moisan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5031D36D.7040107@intel.com \
--to=radu.moisan@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox