Re: meta-cloud layer

["David Nyström" <david.nystrom@enea.com>]

Adding Ray Danks to CC.

Ray, how do you want to go forward with the meta-xen layer ?

 From my perspective, having the actual hypervisor technology abstracted
from the userspace virtualization stuff is preferable. So a user could 
pick-and-place hypervisor layer/s depending on needs. (And good for 
use-case benchmarks as well).

libvirt package and others are smart enough to autodetect underlying 
hypervisor tech capabilities, and should work out-of-the-box from that 
aspect.

As to where all this will finally end up, anything goes as far as I'm 
concerned. I'll continue working in meta-cloud for now, until consensus 
is reached on the final whereabouts for the virtualization specific recipes.

If anyone want to join me on github, send me an email.

Best Regards,
David


On 11/28/2012 06:25 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Richard Purdie <
> richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 17:10 +0100, David Nyström wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm working on getting a minimal Yocto/oe-core based OpenStack setup
>>> running with the meta-cloud layer, with bits and pieces "borrowed" from
>>> the meta-xen layer.
>>
>> Great news!
>>
>> It might be worth growing meta-xen into a meta-virtualisation layer
>> since kvm, openstack and xen all seem to be sharing a lot of pieces.
>> This depends on the maintainers but it would seem to be logical rather
>> than many small interdependent layers.
>>
>
> FWIW. I'd like to see this as well, and can contribute/help where possible.
> I
> was considering a meta-ovs (Open Virtualization Solutions), but if there are
> already plans afoot for a meta-virtualization, then anything I did could be
> pushed down keeping any other layers small.
>
> In particular I'm keen to drive some common kernel configuration, and work
> on consolidating kernel features in trees versus having a whole set of out
> of
> tree modules with better tie in's to userspace enabling features
> dynamically.
>
> So I'll keep an eye out for things as well and help where possible.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
>
>
>>
>>> Still in its infancy, and lots of stuff is still missing and/or not
>>> working properly.
>>>
>>> Have a look if your interested, not much to see yet though.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/nysan/meta-cloud.git
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on floating layer ML:s, i.e. an ML for so called
>>> "out-of-tree" layers ?  Or is the common thought that all new recipes
>>> should eventually go into oe-core ?
>>
>> The Yocto Project has been using the Yocto list for that and
>> OpenEmbedded has openembedded-devel. Its not expected for everything to
>> end up in OE-Core, quite the opposite.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>
>
>