Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: rename perf_3.4 to perf

[Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>]

On 03/07/2013 04:39 PM, tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
>
> There's nothing kernel-version-specific about the perf_3.4 recipe, so
> it's actually misnamed and misleading now that it also gets used with
> the 3.8 kernel.
>
> Since the recipe isn't tied to a specific PV, and simply uses
> whatever's in STAGING_KERNEL_DIR, there's no reason to add anything
> else either to the bare PN, so just use that as the recipe name.
>
This did not quite work out correctly, since the package name has now 
gone backwards since the default PV for a recipe is 1.0 when nothing is 
set on the recipe file name.

Is there a way to sort this out such that it picks up an incrementing PV 
from the kernel recipe?

As it stands now, the PV has gone from 3.4 -> 1.0.

Thanks for looking after this.

Sau!

> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   meta/recipes-kernel/perf/{perf_3.4.bb => perf.bb} | 0
>   1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>   rename meta/recipes-kernel/perf/{perf_3.4.bb => perf.bb} (100%)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf_3.4.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
> similarity index 100%
> rename from meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf_3.4.bb
> rename to meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
>