Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: rename perf_3.4 to perf

[Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>]

On 03/11/2013 04:54 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 03/07/2013 04:39 PM, tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> There's nothing kernel-version-specific about the perf_3.4 recipe, so
>> it's actually misnamed and misleading now that it also gets used with
>> the 3.8 kernel.
>>
>> Since the recipe isn't tied to a specific PV, and simply uses
>> whatever's in STAGING_KERNEL_DIR, there's no reason to add anything
>> else either to the bare PN, so just use that as the recipe name.
>>
> This did not quite work out correctly, since the package name has now 
> gone backwards since the default PV for a recipe is 1.0 when nothing is 
> set on the recipe file name.
> 
> Is there a way to sort this out such that it picks up an incrementing PV 
> from the kernel recipe?
> 
> As it stands now, the PV has gone from 3.4 -> 1.0.
> 
> Thanks for looking after this.

This is what PE is for right? Sounds like we need an epoch bump.

--
Darren hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel