Re: [PATCH 0/5] Enable VPN support in ConnMan

[Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>]

On 05/13/2013 11:33 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Monday 13 May 2013 11:00:56 Saul Wold wrote:
>> On 05/12/2013 10:55 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>> On Sunday 12 May 2013 19:54:50 Phil Blundell wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 08:40 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
>>>>> On 05/12/2013 06:27 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>>>> I think so, it'd be good to have it in oe-core and allow use of vpn :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to see what the full dependency set looks like for these,
>>>>> clearly there is the vpnc, openvpn, l2tp and pptp recipes, but what else
>>>>> and what licenses are they under.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think we necessarily want openvpn, l2tpd and suchlike in
>>>> oe-core.  None of those things seem very "core" to me (in an embedded
>>>> context) and testing them seems like it would be a bit of a challenge.
>>>
>>> I agree, these don't belong in OE-Core. We already have them in meta-
>>> networking.
>>
>> This is what I get for replying to an email while traveling overseas and
>> not being 100% clear about my points.
>>
>> I was more interested in the dependencies then actually thinking about
>> including them in OE-Core,that was not my intent.
>>
>> This would would allow us to better understand if those recipes not in
>> meta-networking could be moved from meta-oe to meta-networking.
>> Currently, I think vpnc and pptp are in meta-networking, not the other 2.
>
> They are all in meta-networking (xl2tpd, pptp-linux and vpnc have always been
> there, openvpn got moved in mid-April).
>
I guess I did not have the latest meta-oe, I was looking in the wrong 
place again!  Looks like this can work out.

Sau!

> Cheers,
> Paul
>