* About update binutils (2.24 to 2.25)
@ 2015-01-08 1:44 Robert Yang
2015-01-08 1:55 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert Yang @ 2015-01-08 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer, Khem Raj
Hi Khem,
I'm trying to upgrade binutils from 2.24 to 2.25, there is
a patch binutils/libtool-2.4-update.patch which has 19317
lines, do you have any ideas on how did we make it in the past,
please ?
$ diffstat ./binutils/libtool-2.4-update.patch
bfd/configure | 1314 +++++++++++++++++-----
bfd/configure.in | 2
binutils/configure | 1312 +++++++++++++++++-----
configure | 2
gas/configure | 1312 +++++++++++++++++-----
gprof/configure | 1317 +++++++++++++++++-----
ld/configure | 1693 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
libtool.m4 | 1094 +++++++++++++------
ltmain.sh | 2925 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
ltoptions.m4 | 2
ltversion.m4 | 12
lt~obsolete.m4 | 2
opcodes/configure | 1314 +++++++++++++++++-----
opcodes/configure.in | 2
14 files changed, 8937 insertions(+), 3366 deletions(-)
--
Thanks
Robert
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: About update binutils (2.24 to 2.25)
2015-01-08 1:44 About update binutils (2.24 to 2.25) Robert Yang
@ 2015-01-08 1:55 ` Khem Raj
2015-01-08 2:05 ` Robert Yang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2015-01-08 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Yang; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> On Jan 7, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Khem,
>
> I'm trying to upgrade binutils from 2.24 to 2.25, there is
> a patch binutils/libtool-2.4-update.patch which has 19317
> lines, do you have any ideas on how did we make it in the past,
> please ?
what conflicts are you seeing ? if they are just in configure files then you
need to autoteconf them manually one by one using the appropriate version of auototools as recommended
for bintutils 2.25 usually gcc/binutils don’t use latest auto tools.
but if they are reporting changes in other files then its a different problem needs to be looked at.
>
> $ diffstat ./binutils/libtool-2.4-update.patch
> bfd/configure | 1314 +++++++++++++++++-----
> bfd/configure.in | 2
> binutils/configure | 1312 +++++++++++++++++-----
> configure | 2
> gas/configure | 1312 +++++++++++++++++-----
> gprof/configure | 1317 +++++++++++++++++-----
> ld/configure | 1693 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> libtool.m4 | 1094 +++++++++++++------
> ltmain.sh | 2925 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> ltoptions.m4 | 2
> ltversion.m4 | 12
> lt~obsolete.m4 | 2
> opcodes/configure | 1314 +++++++++++++++++-----
> opcodes/configure.in | 2
> 14 files changed, 8937 insertions(+), 3366 deletions(-)
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Robert
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: About update binutils (2.24 to 2.25)
2015-01-08 1:55 ` Khem Raj
@ 2015-01-08 2:05 ` Robert Yang
2015-01-08 2:10 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert Yang @ 2015-01-08 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On 01/08/2015 09:55 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> On Jan 7, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Khem,
>>
>> I'm trying to upgrade binutils from 2.24 to 2.25, there is
>> a patch binutils/libtool-2.4-update.patch which has 19317
>> lines, do you have any ideas on how did we make it in the past,
>> please ?
>
> what conflicts are you seeing ? if they are just in configure files then you
> need to autoteconf them manually one by one using the appropriate version of auototools as recommended
> for bintutils 2.25 usually gcc/binutils don’t use latest auto tools.
Conflicts in ld/configure, I fixed it manually, I was curious how we made this
patch, and now you have explained, thanks.
// Robert
>
> but if they are reporting changes in other files then its a different problem needs to be looked at.
>
>
>>
>> $ diffstat ./binutils/libtool-2.4-update.patch
>> bfd/configure | 1314 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> bfd/configure.in | 2
>> binutils/configure | 1312 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> configure | 2
>> gas/configure | 1312 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> gprof/configure | 1317 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> ld/configure | 1693 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> libtool.m4 | 1094 +++++++++++++------
>> ltmain.sh | 2925 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> ltoptions.m4 | 2
>> ltversion.m4 | 12
>> lt~obsolete.m4 | 2
>> opcodes/configure | 1314 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> opcodes/configure.in | 2
>> 14 files changed, 8937 insertions(+), 3366 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>>
>> Robert
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: About update binutils (2.24 to 2.25)
2015-01-08 2:05 ` Robert Yang
@ 2015-01-08 2:10 ` Khem Raj
2015-01-08 2:14 ` Robert Yang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2015-01-08 2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Yang; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> On Jan 7, 2015, at 6:05 PM, Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/08/2015 09:55 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 7, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Khem,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to upgrade binutils from 2.24 to 2.25, there is
>>> a patch binutils/libtool-2.4-update.patch which has 19317
>>> lines, do you have any ideas on how did we make it in the past,
>>> please ?
>>
>> what conflicts are you seeing ? if they are just in configure files then you
>> need to autoteconf them manually one by one using the appropriate version of auototools as recommended
>> for bintutils 2.25 usually gcc/binutils don’t use latest auto tools.
>
> Conflicts in ld/configure, I fixed it manually, I was curious how we made this
> patch, and now you have explained, thanks.
some portions are written and others are generated. since we do not autoreconf binutils, we do have to regenerate configure scripts
so its a special case. Usually that would not be needed for autotooled recipes
>
> // Robert
>
>>
>> but if they are reporting changes in other files then its a different problem needs to be looked at.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> $ diffstat ./binutils/libtool-2.4-update.patch
>>> bfd/configure | 1314 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>> bfd/configure.in | 2
>>> binutils/configure | 1312 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>> configure | 2
>>> gas/configure | 1312 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>> gprof/configure | 1317 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>> ld/configure | 1693 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> libtool.m4 | 1094 +++++++++++++------
>>> ltmain.sh | 2925 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>> ltoptions.m4 | 2
>>> ltversion.m4 | 12
>>> lt~obsolete.m4 | 2
>>> opcodes/configure | 1314 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>> opcodes/configure.in | 2
>>> 14 files changed, 8937 insertions(+), 3366 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Robert
>>
>>
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: About update binutils (2.24 to 2.25)
2015-01-08 2:10 ` Khem Raj
@ 2015-01-08 2:14 ` Robert Yang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert Yang @ 2015-01-08 2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On 01/08/2015 10:10 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> On Jan 7, 2015, at 6:05 PM, Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/08/2015 09:55 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jan 7, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Khem,
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to upgrade binutils from 2.24 to 2.25, there is
>>>> a patch binutils/libtool-2.4-update.patch which has 19317
>>>> lines, do you have any ideas on how did we make it in the past,
>>>> please ?
>>>
>>> what conflicts are you seeing ? if they are just in configure files then you
>>> need to autoteconf them manually one by one using the appropriate version of auototools as recommended
>>> for bintutils 2.25 usually gcc/binutils don’t use latest auto tools.
>>
>> Conflicts in ld/configure, I fixed it manually, I was curious how we made this
>> patch, and now you have explained, thanks.
>
> some portions are written and others are generated. since we do not autoreconf binutils, we do have to regenerate configure scripts
> so its a special case. Usually that would not be needed for autotooled recipes
Thanks, got it.
// Robert
>
>>
>> // Robert
>>
>>>
>>> but if they are reporting changes in other files then its a different problem needs to be looked at.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> $ diffstat ./binutils/libtool-2.4-update.patch
>>>> bfd/configure | 1314 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>>> bfd/configure.in | 2
>>>> binutils/configure | 1312 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>>> configure | 2
>>>> gas/configure | 1312 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>>> gprof/configure | 1317 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>>> ld/configure | 1693 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>> libtool.m4 | 1094 +++++++++++++------
>>>> ltmain.sh | 2925 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>> ltoptions.m4 | 2
>>>> ltversion.m4 | 12
>>>> lt~obsolete.m4 | 2
>>>> opcodes/configure | 1314 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>>> opcodes/configure.in | 2
>>>> 14 files changed, 8937 insertions(+), 3366 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Robert
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-08 2:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-08 1:44 About update binutils (2.24 to 2.25) Robert Yang
2015-01-08 1:55 ` Khem Raj
2015-01-08 2:05 ` Robert Yang
2015-01-08 2:10 ` Khem Raj
2015-01-08 2:14 ` Robert Yang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox