[PATCH] bjam-native: inhibit sysroot strip

[PATCH] bjam-native: inhibit sysroot strip

[wenzong.fan]

From: Wenzong Fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com>

The bjam is already stripped by default. Fix warning:

  WARNING: File '.../tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/bjam' from \
  bjam-native was already stripped, this will prevent future debugging!

Signed-off-by: Wenzong Fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
---
 meta/recipes-support/boost/bjam-native_1.58.0.bb | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/boost/bjam-native_1.58.0.bb b/meta/recipes-support/boost/bjam-native_1.58.0.bb
index d85d1a9..e2e0611 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-support/boost/bjam-native_1.58.0.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/boost/bjam-native_1.58.0.bb
@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ SECTION = "devel"
 
 inherit native
 
+# bjam is already stripped, don't strip it again
+INHIBIT_SYSROOT_STRIP = "1"
+
 do_compile() {
     ./bootstrap.sh --with-toolset=gcc
 }
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH] bjam-native: inhibit sysroot strip

[Burton, Ross]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 285 bytes --]

On 29 July 2015 at 08:34, <wenzong.fan@windriver.com> wrote:

> +# bjam is already stripped, don't strip it again
> +INHIBIT_SYSROOT_STRIP = "1"
>

In case it's even needed to debug bjam-native, how hard would it be to stop
bjam from being stripped in the first place?

Ross

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 748 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] bjam-native: inhibit sysroot strip

[wenzong fan]

On 07/29/2015 06:19 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 29 July 2015 at 08:34, <wenzong.fan@windriver.com
> <mailto:wenzong.fan@windriver.com>> wrote:
>
>     +# bjam is already stripped, don't strip it again
>     +INHIBIT_SYSROOT_STRIP = "1"
>
>
> In case it's even needed to debug bjam-native, how hard would it be to
> stop bjam from being stripped in the first place?

By default, a release version is stripped, we could build & install the 
debug version for bjam.

For specific changes, we only need to append "--debug" to build.sh, then 
update do_install() to select the unstripped version.

Do you think this is the right ways?

Thanks
Wenzong

>
> Ross

Re: [PATCH] bjam-native: inhibit sysroot strip

[Khem Raj]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1161 bytes --]


> On Jul 30, 2015, at 12:40 AM, wenzong fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com> wrote:
> 
> On 07/29/2015 06:19 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> 
>> On 29 July 2015 at 08:34, <wenzong.fan@windriver.com
>> <mailto:wenzong.fan@windriver.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>    +# bjam is already stripped, don't strip it again
>>    +INHIBIT_SYSROOT_STRIP = "1"
>> 
>> 
>> In case it's even needed to debug bjam-native, how hard would it be to
>> stop bjam from being stripped in the first place?
> 
> By default, a release version is stripped, we could build & install the debug version for bjam.
> 
> For specific changes, we only need to append "--debug" to build.sh, then update do_install() to select the unstripped version.
> 
> Do you think this is the right ways?


export INSTALL=“install” or something like that might do it. usually folks use install -s by default during install step which cause such issues.

> Thanks
> Wenzong
> 
>> 
>> Ross
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] bjam-native: inhibit sysroot strip

[wenzong fan]

On 08/09/2015 07:52 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 12:40 AM, wenzong fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 07/29/2015 06:19 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29 July 2015 at 08:34, <wenzong.fan@windriver.com
>>> <mailto:wenzong.fan@windriver.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     +# bjam is already stripped, don't strip it again
>>>     +INHIBIT_SYSROOT_STRIP = "1"
>>>
>>>
>>> In case it's even needed to debug bjam-native, how hard would it be to
>>> stop bjam from being stripped in the first place?
>>
>> By default, a release version is stripped, we could build & install the debug version for bjam.
>>
>> For specific changes, we only need to append "--debug" to build.sh, then update do_install() to select the unstripped version.
>>
>> Do you think this is the right ways?
>
>
> export INSTALL=“install” or something like that might do it. usually folks use install -s by default during install step which cause such issues.

The bjam is stripped while compiling via gcc options '-s'. There are 
three build types defined in build.jam:

...
     [ opt --release : [ opt --symbols : -g : -s ] -O3 ]
     [ opt --debug : -g -O0 -fno-inline ]
     [ opt --profile : -O3 -g -pg ]
...

Build & install "debug" version would provide unstripped bjam for 
further stripping. I have sent V2 patch:

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] bjam-native: build and install bjam.debug

Thanks
Wenzong

>
>> Thanks
>> Wenzong
>>
>>>
>>> Ross
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>