From: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
To: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan.agner@toradex.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] opkg: avoid running postinst scripts twice when using systemd
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 13:02:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6343b842ae337aae5b3dc32e566414dc@agner.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <129da6c9-63f8-c660-ec6c-d6b9ba28e480@linux.intel.com>
On 2017-12-14 19:04, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On 12/14/2017 07:49 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
>> On 12/14/2017 07:40 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, I see, well that simplifies it, doesn't it? E.g.
>>>
>>> # If package managers support postinsts and the package manager is
>>> present on the
>>> # rootfs, then it will handle postinsts just fine, no need to deploy
>>> scripts again.
>>> if delayed_postinsts and not runtime_pkgmanage:
>>> self._save_postinsts()
>>>
>>> And with that it will be as it used to be before the above commit, and
>>> the way it should be.
>>
>> Sorry, but no. You are making an implicit assumption about how rpmrootfs child class behaves here, which is not a good thing to do in a parent class.
>
> What you *can* do however is move the "and not runtime_pkgmanage"
> check into the child classes for opkg and dpkg. I'm fine with that.
>
That sounds sensible. Will send a patchset.
--
Stefan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-16 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-13 18:06 [RFC] opkg: avoid running postinst scripts twice when using systemd Stefan Agner
2017-12-13 18:29 ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 13:10 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 13:11 ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 13:52 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 13:59 ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 14:24 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 14:41 ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 14:55 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 14:57 ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 15:14 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 16:46 ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 16:59 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 17:16 ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 17:28 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 17:40 ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 17:49 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 18:04 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-16 12:02 ` Stefan Agner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6343b842ae337aae5b3dc32e566414dc@agner.ch \
--to=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=stefan.agner@toradex.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox